WikiPlay wrote:Why do we have a Security Council anyway?
For resolutions that have a point
Advertisement
by Almonaster Nuevo » Mon Feb 05, 2018 4:30 am
by Lenlyvit » Mon Feb 05, 2018 7:21 am
WikiPlay wrote:Princess Luna Gangleader of Boil Heights wrote:Half the time I have no clue what they are saying beyond page 3.
I agree with you for 100%
There is no serious discussion anymore.
I would like to read concrete solutions.
What else can the natives of Westphalia do?
OUTRAGEOUS!!!
They ejected and banned almost every native in Westphalia.
Why do we have a Security Council anyway?
by Lord Dominator » Mon Feb 05, 2018 8:12 am
Lenlyvit wrote:WikiPlay wrote:
I agree with you for 100%
There is no serious discussion anymore.
I would like to read concrete solutions.
What else can the natives of Westphalia do?
OUTRAGEOUS!!!
They ejected and banned almost every native in Westphalia.
Why do we have a Security Council anyway?
At my last count there's still almost 70-80 native nations still in the region Wikiplay.
by The Atlae Isles » Mon Feb 05, 2018 10:54 am
WikiPlay wrote:What else can the natives of Westphalia do?
OUTRAGEOUS!!!
They ejected and banned almost every native in Westphalia.
by Klaus Devestatorie » Mon Feb 05, 2018 2:45 pm
Unibot III wrote:This is clearly someone's idea of a joke at Mike's expense. Nine years makes for a helluva slow burner. 'Environmental Rebels' pulled this maneuver when New Earth (Rolamec) was invading Land of the Liberals.
by Drop Your Pants » Mon Feb 05, 2018 6:21 pm
Klaus Devestatorie wrote:Unibot III wrote:This is clearly someone's idea of a joke at Mike's expense. Nine years makes for a helluva slow burner. 'Environmental Rebels' pulled this maneuver when New Earth (Rolamec) was invading Land of the Liberals.
Try a few less years, because Westphalia has some deep debts that are still well overdue.
by Klaus Devestatorie » Mon Feb 05, 2018 8:33 pm
by He Qixin 2 » Mon Feb 05, 2018 10:02 pm
WikiPlay wrote:
They ejected and banned almost every native in Westphalia.
Why do we have a Security Council anyway?
by Shaktirajya » Mon Feb 05, 2018 10:07 pm
by Drop Your Pants » Mon Feb 05, 2018 10:08 pm
Klaus Devestatorie wrote:About 6, and while you may operate differently, I don't let grudges expire. Especially not on forum destruction; especially not on anything that happened in the second half of 2011 as fuck that entire period of time especially. Westphalia was directly involved; they will never be safe, because I will not consider justice to be done until I'm personally the founder of the place.
He Qixin 2 wrote:
1) That's why we have a liberation so that we can bring them back following the region's capture by invaders, but apparently, due to negative reasons, this proposal is largely unsupported.
by Unibot III » Tue Feb 06, 2018 12:07 am
Klaus Devestatorie wrote:Drop Your Pants wrote:How many years ago was that? I know R/D enjoys a good grudge but really?
About 6, and while you may operate differently, I don't let grudges expire. Especially not on forum destruction; especially not on anything that happened in the second half of 2011 as fuck that entire period of time especially. Westphalia was directly involved; they will never be safe, because I will not consider justice to be done until I'm personally the founder of the place.
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by Ever-Wandering Souls » Tue Feb 06, 2018 2:12 am
The Alicorns (Equestria) wrote:Let them stay, no need to badmouth them...From our view a bunch of nations just came in, seized the delegate position, and changed a few superficial things...we play NationStates differently...there's really no reason for us to be butthurt.
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8944227
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8951258
Reploid Productions wrote:Raiders are endlessly creative
by WikiPlay » Tue Feb 06, 2018 2:39 am
by The Noble Thatcherites » Tue Feb 06, 2018 4:39 am
Maybe YOU should start reading. If you read the rules of the Security Council then you'd know that a SC resolution removes a password. Is there a password over Westphalia? No.WikiPlay wrote:@Ridersyl: READ, there is already one in-depth discussion about this on page 3
Why is this SC resolution pointless?
Kanglia wrote:Thatcher. Wants. As. Little. To. Do. With. You. All. As. Possible.
Résumé
The Union of Democratic States
Citizen and Founder
Prime Minister (x1)
Motion(s) Passed (x15)
Ambassador (x21)
Publisher for The Union Post (x5)
Constitutional Framer (x4)
The Free Nations Region
Citizen and Legislator
Justice (x1)
Motion(s) Passed (1x)
The Allied States
Citizen
Senator (x1)
FORGE
Representative (x4)
Chancellor (x1)
ITDA
Founder
Representative (x1)
Secretary General (x1)
Charter Author (x2)
Court of International Law and Justice
Foreign Affairs Justice (x1)
Europeia
Citizen and Assemblyman (x1)
The South Pacific
Citizen
SPSF Recruit (x1)
by Drop Your Pants » Tue Feb 06, 2018 6:03 am
The Noble Thatcherites wrote:Maybe YOU should start reading. If you read the rules of the Security Council then you'd know that a SC resolution removes a password. Is there a password over Westphalia? No.
</discussion>
by The Noble Thatcherites » Tue Feb 06, 2018 6:17 am
That is true. However it isn't 100% evident that a password will end up being placed over Westphalia. It is likely, but not 100% evident. If they do, then proposing a liberation would gain much more traction then trying to preemtively liberate Westphalia.Drop Your Pants wrote:The Noble Thatcherites wrote:Maybe YOU should start reading. If you read the rules of the Security Council then you'd know that a SC resolution removes a password. Is there a password over Westphalia? No.
</discussion>
It also removes the delegates ability to password. You nearly looked like you knew what you were talking about, keep it up
Kanglia wrote:Thatcher. Wants. As. Little. To. Do. With. You. All. As. Possible.
Résumé
The Union of Democratic States
Citizen and Founder
Prime Minister (x1)
Motion(s) Passed (x15)
Ambassador (x21)
Publisher for The Union Post (x5)
Constitutional Framer (x4)
The Free Nations Region
Citizen and Legislator
Justice (x1)
Motion(s) Passed (1x)
The Allied States
Citizen
Senator (x1)
FORGE
Representative (x4)
Chancellor (x1)
ITDA
Founder
Representative (x1)
Secretary General (x1)
Charter Author (x2)
Court of International Law and Justice
Foreign Affairs Justice (x1)
Europeia
Citizen and Assemblyman (x1)
The South Pacific
Citizen
SPSF Recruit (x1)
by Fratt » Tue Feb 06, 2018 4:26 pm
The Noble Thatcherites wrote:However it isn't 100% evident that a password will end up being placed over Westphalia. It is likely, but not 100% evident.
A spambot wrote:You said that the NPO should not change it's core culture.
Literally everyone else, including the NPO, realizes and understands that NPO culture is the problem.
I'm sure these are the best towel warmers and it will come in handy here.
So you either don't realize that the NPO's core culture caused a war and the subversion of countless regions, or you just don't care.
by Klaus Devestatorie » Tue Feb 06, 2018 7:17 pm
Unibot III wrote:Klaus Devestatorie wrote:About 6, and while you may operate differently, I don't let grudges expire. Especially not on forum destruction; especially not on anything that happened in the second half of 2011 as fuck that entire period of time especially. Westphalia was directly involved; they will never be safe, because I will not consider justice to be done until I'm personally the founder of the place.
Let it go, Klaus. Most of the people in Westphalia seem altogether completely clueless about Gameplay. You aren't getting any kind of vengeance from pissing on them.
We all have things we'd like to get revenge for, but we don't all get the opportunity to. Sometimes we just have to move on.
by RiderSyl » Tue Feb 06, 2018 7:50 pm
Klaus Devestatorie wrote:No matter the result of this raid, I have a new policy from now on- if someone that isn't an in context ally comes to me and asks for me to even lift a finger on offsite property destruction, even just to drop a banhammer, they're going to have to prove to me that they care objectively about the issue, and not just about their own problem. To do that, they'll have to help me solve one of mine, and because I'm a deeply distrustful person, I'll want my problem solved first, no matter how long it takes or how long ago it was.
by Klaus Devestatorie » Tue Feb 06, 2018 9:13 pm
RiderSyl wrote:Klaus Devestatorie wrote:No matter the result of this raid, I have a new policy from now on- if someone that isn't an in context ally comes to me and asks for me to even lift a finger on offsite property destruction, even just to drop a banhammer, they're going to have to prove to me that they care objectively about the issue, and not just about their own problem. To do that, they'll have to help me solve one of mine, and because I'm a deeply distrustful person, I'll want my problem solved first, no matter how long it takes or how long ago it was.
Okay then, Avakael. Here's hoping you are never in a position where someone needs you to deal with offsite property destruction, so that you cannot manipulate the situation to your own benefit.
by Radicaster » Tue Feb 06, 2018 10:00 pm
by The Atlae Isles » Tue Feb 06, 2018 10:20 pm
281 days ago: Embassy opened with The Iron Order.
by Banyuwangi » Wed Feb 07, 2018 12:07 am
Radicaster wrote:"I know this is the first time I'm swearing in public but: Fuck Westphalia. They violated our region's recruitment policy in the past by targeting the North Pacific for recruitment. Furthermore, it would take a while for a password to be set up, and it appears to be unlikely in the near future given the considerable influence of the natives. We are AGAINST."
by Reploid Productions » Wed Feb 07, 2018 12:15 am
Banyuwangi wrote:Radicaster wrote:"I know this is the first time I'm swearing in public but: Fuck Westphalia. They violated our region's recruitment policy in the past by targeting the North Pacific for recruitment. Furthermore, it would take a while for a password to be set up, and it appears to be unlikely in the near future given the considerable influence of the natives. We are AGAINST."
Maybe they violated your own regional rules. You violated the Terms of Service of Nationstates.
btw: how can a region survive without any recruitment telegrams ???
[violet] wrote:Maybe we could power our new search engine from the sexual tension between you two.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Themistria
Advertisement