Advertisement
by Jabberwocky » Wed Jan 31, 2018 11:08 pm
by Herby » Thu Feb 01, 2018 3:11 am
Jabberwocky wrote:Despite the fact that Wrapper locked one of my threads for what I considered purely arbitrary reasons, the wording of the proposal reads like an ad hominem attack based upon a personal dislike of Wrapper. The draft assumes definitions upon which there is clearly no consensual agreement. For those reasons, Sherlock Quixote is opposed.
by Harbertia » Thu Feb 01, 2018 3:38 am
RiderSyl wrote:In this Condemnation, there's 3 weak points that never should have made the final draft. They're just stupid. Nothing is condemn-worthy about karaoke night, Groot jokes, or a shitpost in The Strangers' Bar.
Your awkward WA forum in-jokes don't belong in a Condemn proposal, guys. It just makes it cringe-worthy, and easier to repeal.
by Harbertia » Thu Feb 01, 2018 3:44 am
Oresland wrote:The WA's resolutions don't even affect the individual member states
by Ransium » Thu Feb 01, 2018 3:59 am
Harbertia wrote:Oresland wrote:The WA's resolutions don't even affect the individual member states
Incorrect. As moderator Mallorea and Riva state there is confusion on this point and they provide a good example in this section. I first discovered the impact when I was a WA member under the name 'Megacorp' or 'Megacorp International' and saw my government category altered upon the passing of a WA resolution as prior I had stopped responding to naton issues having achieved the desired corporate government form.
by Harbertia » Thu Feb 01, 2018 4:32 am
Ransium wrote:Harbertia wrote:Incorrect. As moderator Mallorea and Riva state there is confusion on this point and they provide a good example in this section. I first discovered the impact when I was a WA member under the name 'Megacorp' or 'Megacorp International' and saw my government category altered upon the passing of a WA resolution as prior I had stopped responding to naton issues having achieved the desired corporate government form.
Okay, I’ve got to step in and correct factual inaccuracy. You’re confused. General Assembly legislation impacts stats. Condemnations/commendations do nothing stats wise.
Overall, my intent was not to cause such offense to Wrapper, you, or this August Assembly and I’m truly sorry I did offend you.
by Jabberwocky » Thu Feb 01, 2018 10:22 am
Herby wrote:Jabberwocky wrote:Despite the fact that Wrapper locked one of my threads for what I considered purely arbitrary reasons, the wording of the proposal reads like an ad hominem attack based upon a personal dislike of Wrapper. The draft assumes definitions upon which there is clearly no consensual agreement. For those reasons, Sherlock Quixote is opposed.
A personal dislike? In real life? Heh heh heh heh. Nothing could be farther from the truth!
by Lord Dominator » Thu Feb 01, 2018 2:05 pm
by Liagolas » Thu Feb 01, 2018 5:47 pm
RiderSyl wrote:In this Condemnation, there's 3 weak points that never should have made the final draft. They're just stupid. Nothing is condemn-worthy about karaoke night, Groot jokes, or a shitpost in The Strangers' Bar.
Your awkward WA forum in-jokes don't belong in a Condemn proposal, guys. It just makes it cringe-worthy, and easier to repeal.
by RiderSyl » Thu Feb 01, 2018 5:52 pm
Liagolas wrote:RiderSyl wrote:In this Condemnation, there's 3 weak points that never should have made the final draft. They're just stupid. Nothing is condemn-worthy about karaoke night, Groot jokes, or a shitpost in The Strangers' Bar.
Your awkward WA forum in-jokes don't belong in a Condemn proposal, guys. It just makes it cringe-worthy, and easier to repeal.
"Then this august body shall await the repeal and thereupon the revocation of the Puddle-Jumping Wads' fancy sticker," the Mouth of the Dominion says while finagling with the snarled microphone cords of a karaoke machine. "Since it is so easy, it is the expectation of the Dominion that it should not take long."
by Herby » Fri Feb 02, 2018 9:54 am
RiderSyl wrote:In this Condemnation, there's 3 weak points that never should have made the final draft. They're just stupid. Nothing is condemn-worthy about karaoke night, Groot jokes, or a shitpost in The Strangers' Bar.
Your awkward WA forum in-jokes don't belong in a Condemn proposal, guys. It just makes it cringe-worthy, and easier to repeal.
New Keam wrote:The WA Ambassador from New Keam rises from his seat. "This is the best condemnation ever written. I call on everyone to vote for it".
by The Atlae Isles » Fri Feb 02, 2018 10:28 am
Harbertia wrote:Why immortalize the positive with a negative label? Should a man who has lived a life of celibacy be branded a rapist?
by Queen Yuno » Sat Feb 03, 2018 3:06 pm
by Fishy Apples » Sat Feb 03, 2018 6:02 pm
New Keam wrote:The WA Ambassador from New Keam rises from his seat. "This is the best condemnation ever written. I call on everyone to vote for it".
by Herby » Sat Feb 03, 2018 8:25 pm
Queen Yuno wrote:I voted for this because Wrapper is nice.
by Ransium » Sat Feb 03, 2018 10:35 pm
Condemn Wrapper was passed 13,834 votes to 4,038.
by Wrapper » Mon Feb 05, 2018 3:47 am
by Herby » Wed Feb 07, 2018 9:58 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement