NATION

PASSWORD

[PASSED] Restrictions on Hydraulic Fracturing

A carefully preserved record of the most notable World Assembly debates.

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Principality of the Raix
Diplomat
 
Posts: 836
Founded: Sep 05, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Principality of the Raix » Sun Nov 26, 2017 12:07 am

Lost Brotherhood wrote:Regardless, the way this bill is worded, it doesn't distinguish between proper and improper methods. It literally straight up says:
"Prohibits the practice of hydraulic fracturing in all areas of World Assembly member-states which are in or within close range of land inhabited by populations of sapient beings..."

First off, that distance is arbitrary and undefined. There is no way in the world that that can be enforced.
Second, prohibiting and restricting are 2 VERY different things. Anyone who tries to argue otherwise is highly advised to consult a dictionary



Okay, let's consult the dictionary on prohibition. But in this case it is meant to ban, prevent or forbid certain actions. Which are in close vicinity to urban area's such as city's. That is what is occurring here and the only thing I can see solidifying your complaint is something I agree on and it is the distance is not stated. Plus there is 3 definitions to Prohibit, besides the adjectives.

Edited in: Which by preventing something close to an urban area, we are successfully restricting it. However, as I stated above. The distance is an issue to me too, however the bill as a whole is good until a new one is worked out that can address that.... one thing.
Last edited by Principality of the Raix on Sun Nov 26, 2017 12:14 am, edited 2 times in total.
Prince Hildehrand, Principality of the Raix;Technocratic Allied States President.
Technocratic Forum
I do not use NS stats, but I do use Policies due to the Nation's Goals.
Conservative Libertarian Total-Isolationist Nationalist Reactionary
Collectivism score: -67%
Authoritarianism score: -50%
Internationalism score: -83%
Tribalism score: 33%
Liberalism score: -67%

Pro: Pro-Life, Limited Government, 2nd Amendment, 1st Amendment.
Con: Pro-Choice, Communism, Anarchism, Totalitarianism.

User avatar
Lost Brotherhood
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 16
Founded: Oct 15, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Lost Brotherhood » Sun Nov 26, 2017 12:16 am

Principality of the Raix wrote:
Lost Brotherhood wrote:Regardless, the way this bill is worded, it doesn't distinguish between proper and improper methods. It literally straight up says:

First off, that distance is arbitrary and undefined. There is no way in the world that that can be enforced.
Second, prohibiting and restricting are 2 VERY different things. Anyone who tries to argue otherwise is highly advised to consult a dictionary



Okay, let's consult the dictionary on prohibition. But in this case it is meant to ban, prevent or forbid certain actions. Which are in close vicinity to urban area's such as city's. That is what is occurring here and the only thing I can see solidifying your complaint is something I agree on and it is the distance is not stated. Plus there is 3 definitions to Prohibit, besides the adjectives.

Edited in: Which by preventing something close to an urban area, we are successfully restricting it. However, as I stated above. The distance is an issue to me too, however the bill as a whole is good until a new one is worked out that can address that.... one thing.


Personally, I don't believe in patch jobs. Either get it right, or don't do it at all; especially when there are WA guidelines which state that bills cannot be amended. I would support a proper rendition of this bill, which makes the appropriate distinctions and exceptions. However, in its current form, this bill is not fit to be enacted into law
The day is as a phoenix; it dies a fiery death, only to be reborn from the ashes of night

User avatar
Principality of the Raix
Diplomat
 
Posts: 836
Founded: Sep 05, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Principality of the Raix » Sun Nov 26, 2017 12:21 am

Lost Brotherhood wrote:
Personally, I don't believe in patch jobs. Either get it right, or don't do it at all; especially when there are WA guidelines which state that bills cannot be amended. I would support a proper rendition of this bill, which makes the appropriate distinctions and exceptions. However, in its current form, this bill is not fit to be enacted into law


I don't believe in patch jobs either, but then again this is not My proposal. Reason I stated the above, if he wants to revoke his own work; It is more likely to be repealed. While I could support this or a rewritten draft, course the only thing that irks me on this one is the distance. Seeing as that is a replaceable concept. However, right now I see no reason to repeal it. Specially seeing as it is or would be benefiting most individuals, while distance in fracking is hard to argue. Why? As stated previously, when you have fracking. It can pollute rivers miles away from the site due to run-off near populated regions. Or it can happen very close, however as stated by one that you quoted. That is only if done cheaply, which in the end this bill restricts it entirely from being done cheaply. So distance.... yeah...
Prince Hildehrand, Principality of the Raix;Technocratic Allied States President.
Technocratic Forum
I do not use NS stats, but I do use Policies due to the Nation's Goals.
Conservative Libertarian Total-Isolationist Nationalist Reactionary
Collectivism score: -67%
Authoritarianism score: -50%
Internationalism score: -83%
Tribalism score: 33%
Liberalism score: -67%

Pro: Pro-Life, Limited Government, 2nd Amendment, 1st Amendment.
Con: Pro-Choice, Communism, Anarchism, Totalitarianism.

User avatar
Lost Brotherhood
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 16
Founded: Oct 15, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Lost Brotherhood » Sun Nov 26, 2017 12:46 am

That is only if done cheaply, which in the end this bill restricts it entirely from being done cheaply.


Delete that last "cheaply" and you have what this bill actually does, though. There is no provision for proper execution of the fracking technique
The day is as a phoenix; it dies a fiery death, only to be reborn from the ashes of night

User avatar
United Massachusetts
Minister
 
Posts: 2574
Founded: Jan 17, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby United Massachusetts » Sun Nov 26, 2017 6:16 am

I'm on mobile now, so I'm sorry for being rather unresponsive. In short, I find the repeal arguments laid out by Imperium Anglorum monumentally facetious

User avatar
Bears Armed
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21479
Founded: Jun 01, 2006
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Bears Armed » Sun Nov 26, 2017 6:40 am

Lost Brotherhood wrote:First off, that distance is arbitrary and undefined. There is no way in the world that that can be enforced.

If & when this passes, it becomes law in all member nations. It is then up to those nations' own legal systems, acting "in good faith", to define that distance. That's standard practice for any undefined terms in resolutions.
Last edited by Bears Armed on Sun Nov 26, 2017 6:41 am, edited 2 times in total.
The Confrederated Clans (and other Confrederated Bodys) of the Free Bears of Bears Armed
(includes The Ursine NorthLands) Demonym = Bear[s]; adjective = ‘Urrsish’.
Population = just under 20 million. Economy = only Thriving. Average Life expectancy = c.60 years. If the nation is classified as 'Anarchy' there still is a [strictly limited] national government... and those aren't "biker gangs", they're traditional cross-Clan 'Warrior Societies', generally respected rather than feared.
Author of some GA Resolutions, via Bears Armed Mission; subject of an SC resolution.
Factbook. We have more than 70 MAPS. Visitors' Guide.
The IDU's WA Drafting Room is open to help you.
Author of issues #429, 712, 729, 934, 1120, 1152, 1474, 1521.

User avatar
Darksonium
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 13
Founded: Jan 09, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Darksonium » Sun Nov 26, 2017 1:06 pm

Bears Armed wrote:If & when this passes, it becomes law in all member nations. It is then up to those nations' own legal systems, acting "in good faith", to define that distance. That's standard practice for any undefined terms in resolutions.

Our legal system puts the distance at 1 parsec. Seems about right.

User avatar
Scherzinger
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 361
Founded: Aug 17, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Scherzinger » Sun Nov 26, 2017 1:59 pm

Darksonium wrote:
Bears Armed wrote:If & when this passes, it becomes law in all member nations. It is then up to those nations' own legal systems, acting "in good faith", to define that distance. That's standard practice for any undefined terms in resolutions.

Our legal system puts the distance at 1 parsec. Seems about right.


we continue to ignore these resolutions and this one as well. Against we stand by those who are against it as well

User avatar
Willania Imperium
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1238
Founded: Feb 06, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Willania Imperium » Sun Nov 26, 2017 2:14 pm

Scherzinger wrote:
Darksonium wrote:Our legal system puts the distance at 1 parsec. Seems about right.


we continue to ignore these resolutions and this one as well. Against we stand by those who are against it as well


OOC: Alright, now this is getting annoying. If you keep up with this attitude, you are showing that you are unwilling to listen and follow the rules. Not only that, but you are trying to godmod. Stop this attitude and comply.

IC: "Well, it seems to me a sensible, logical piece of work that I find worthy of support. For."

Pro: Capitalism, Socialism, Technological Advances, Science, Knowledge, Environmentalism, Cooperation, Pacifism, (Soft) Communism
Con: Fascism, Radicals, (Hard) Communism, Primitive Ideas
Social Liberal
Left: 6.22
Libertarian: 0.19
Foreign Policy: Moderate Non-Interventionalist
Culture: Moderate Cultural Liberal
WILLANIA IMPERIUM
[☮] -- Copy and paste this into your signature if you are a pacifist.
If you support liberal democratic capitalism, paste this into your sig: $LFD
[_★_]_[' ]_
( -_-) (-_Q) If you understand that both Capitalism and Socialism have ideas that deserve merit, put this in your signature.

A 13.7 civilization, according to this index.

User avatar
Reggina
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 3
Founded: Dec 07, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Reggina » Sun Nov 26, 2017 2:36 pm

How would we even enforce such a measure?

User avatar
States of Glory WA Office
Minister
 
Posts: 2105
Founded: Jul 26, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby States of Glory WA Office » Sun Nov 26, 2017 3:04 pm

Darksonium wrote:
Bears Armed wrote:If & when this passes, it becomes law in all member nations. It is then up to those nations' own legal systems, acting "in good faith", to define that distance. That's standard practice for any undefined terms in resolutions.

Our legal system puts the distance at 1 parsec. Seems about right.

Neville: Ah, an interplanetary empire. Tell me: Are your citizens robotic or organic?
Ambassador: Neville Lynn Robert
Assistant: Harold "The Clown" Johnson
#MakeLegislationFunnyAgain

User avatar
Scherzinger
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 361
Founded: Aug 17, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Scherzinger » Sun Nov 26, 2017 4:08 pm

Willania Imperium wrote:
Scherzinger wrote:
we continue to ignore these resolutions and this one as well. Against we stand by those who are against it as well


OOC: Alright, now this is getting annoying. If you keep up with this attitude, you are showing that you are unwilling to listen and follow the rules. Not only that, but you are trying to godmod. Stop this attitude and comply.

IC: "Well, it seems to me a sensible, logical piece of work that I find worthy of support. For."


IC: look at me, do i look afraid?

User avatar
Willania Imperium
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1238
Founded: Feb 06, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Willania Imperium » Sun Nov 26, 2017 4:09 pm

Scherzinger wrote:
Willania Imperium wrote:
OOC: Alright, now this is getting annoying. If you keep up with this attitude, you are showing that you are unwilling to listen and follow the rules. Not only that, but you are trying to godmod. Stop this attitude and comply.

IC: "Well, it seems to me a sensible, logical piece of work that I find worthy of support. For."


IC: look at me, do i look afraid?


OOC: You don't know what OOC and IC means, don't you?

Pro: Capitalism, Socialism, Technological Advances, Science, Knowledge, Environmentalism, Cooperation, Pacifism, (Soft) Communism
Con: Fascism, Radicals, (Hard) Communism, Primitive Ideas
Social Liberal
Left: 6.22
Libertarian: 0.19
Foreign Policy: Moderate Non-Interventionalist
Culture: Moderate Cultural Liberal
WILLANIA IMPERIUM
[☮] -- Copy and paste this into your signature if you are a pacifist.
If you support liberal democratic capitalism, paste this into your sig: $LFD
[_★_]_[' ]_
( -_-) (-_Q) If you understand that both Capitalism and Socialism have ideas that deserve merit, put this in your signature.

A 13.7 civilization, according to this index.


User avatar
Lost Brotherhood
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 16
Founded: Oct 15, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Lost Brotherhood » Sun Nov 26, 2017 4:25 pm

Scherzinger wrote:
Willania Imperium wrote:
OOC: You don't know what OOC and IC means, don't you?


OOC: as a matter of fact i do, it means Out Of Character and In Character, referring to role-playing. Do all you filthy Democracies think we Communists are that stupid?


OOC: It would help if you didn't give the impression of not knowing that Communism and Consumerism aren't the same thing XP
The day is as a phoenix; it dies a fiery death, only to be reborn from the ashes of night

User avatar
Willania Imperium
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1238
Founded: Feb 06, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Willania Imperium » Sun Nov 26, 2017 4:25 pm

Scherzinger wrote:
Willania Imperium wrote:
OOC: You don't know what OOC and IC means, don't you?


OOC: as a matter of fact i do, it means Out Of Character and In Character, referring to role-playing. Do all you filthy Democracies think we Communists are that stupid?


OOC: Then why did you reply to an IC post approving the proposal with a reply that seems for OOC?

Pro: Capitalism, Socialism, Technological Advances, Science, Knowledge, Environmentalism, Cooperation, Pacifism, (Soft) Communism
Con: Fascism, Radicals, (Hard) Communism, Primitive Ideas
Social Liberal
Left: 6.22
Libertarian: 0.19
Foreign Policy: Moderate Non-Interventionalist
Culture: Moderate Cultural Liberal
WILLANIA IMPERIUM
[☮] -- Copy and paste this into your signature if you are a pacifist.
If you support liberal democratic capitalism, paste this into your sig: $LFD
[_★_]_[' ]_
( -_-) (-_Q) If you understand that both Capitalism and Socialism have ideas that deserve merit, put this in your signature.

A 13.7 civilization, according to this index.


User avatar
Willania Imperium
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1238
Founded: Feb 06, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Willania Imperium » Sun Nov 26, 2017 4:40 pm

Scherzinger wrote:
Willania Imperium wrote:
OOC: Then why did you reply to an IC post approving the proposal with a reply that seems for OOC?


i was replying to the OOC one


You signified that it was a IC one.
Scherzinger wrote:
Willania Imperium wrote:
OOC: Alright, now this is getting annoying. If you keep up with this attitude, you are showing that you are unwilling to listen and follow the rules. Not only that, but you are trying to godmod. Stop this attitude and comply.

IC: "Well, it seems to me a sensible, logical piece of work that I find worthy of support. For."


IC: look at me, do i look afraid?
Last edited by Willania Imperium on Sun Nov 26, 2017 4:43 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Pro: Capitalism, Socialism, Technological Advances, Science, Knowledge, Environmentalism, Cooperation, Pacifism, (Soft) Communism
Con: Fascism, Radicals, (Hard) Communism, Primitive Ideas
Social Liberal
Left: 6.22
Libertarian: 0.19
Foreign Policy: Moderate Non-Interventionalist
Culture: Moderate Cultural Liberal
WILLANIA IMPERIUM
[☮] -- Copy and paste this into your signature if you are a pacifist.
If you support liberal democratic capitalism, paste this into your sig: $LFD
[_★_]_[' ]_
( -_-) (-_Q) If you understand that both Capitalism and Socialism have ideas that deserve merit, put this in your signature.

A 13.7 civilization, according to this index.


User avatar
Willania Imperium
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1238
Founded: Feb 06, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Willania Imperium » Sun Nov 26, 2017 5:10 pm

Scherzinger wrote:
Willania Imperium wrote:
You signified that it was a IC one.


either way, eriously. do i look afraid of anything you could possibly do?


OOC: I find this conversation no longer relevant. Time to end this before we cause a threadjack. This conversation serves no purpose.

Pro: Capitalism, Socialism, Technological Advances, Science, Knowledge, Environmentalism, Cooperation, Pacifism, (Soft) Communism
Con: Fascism, Radicals, (Hard) Communism, Primitive Ideas
Social Liberal
Left: 6.22
Libertarian: 0.19
Foreign Policy: Moderate Non-Interventionalist
Culture: Moderate Cultural Liberal
WILLANIA IMPERIUM
[☮] -- Copy and paste this into your signature if you are a pacifist.
If you support liberal democratic capitalism, paste this into your sig: $LFD
[_★_]_[' ]_
( -_-) (-_Q) If you understand that both Capitalism and Socialism have ideas that deserve merit, put this in your signature.

A 13.7 civilization, according to this index.

User avatar
Principality of the Raix
Diplomat
 
Posts: 836
Founded: Sep 05, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Principality of the Raix » Sun Nov 26, 2017 6:33 pm

Okay... So any ways, I think everything that could be said; Has been said. I guess all I got to say, is enjoy voting. :)
Prince Hildehrand, Principality of the Raix;Technocratic Allied States President.
Technocratic Forum
I do not use NS stats, but I do use Policies due to the Nation's Goals.
Conservative Libertarian Total-Isolationist Nationalist Reactionary
Collectivism score: -67%
Authoritarianism score: -50%
Internationalism score: -83%
Tribalism score: 33%
Liberalism score: -67%

Pro: Pro-Life, Limited Government, 2nd Amendment, 1st Amendment.
Con: Pro-Choice, Communism, Anarchism, Totalitarianism.

User avatar
Separatist Peoples
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 16989
Founded: Feb 17, 2011
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Separatist Peoples » Mon Nov 27, 2017 5:08 am

Scherzinger wrote:
Willania Imperium wrote:
OOC: You don't know what OOC and IC means, don't you?


OOC: as a matter of fact i do, it means Out Of Character and In Character, referring to role-playing. Do all you filthy Democracies think we Communists are that stupid?

Ooc: not Communists, per se, but let's face it, sticking to good IC/PIC etiquette is important in a role-playing forum.

His Worshipfulness, the Most Unscrupulous, Plainly Deceitful, Dissembling, Strategicly Calculating Lord GA Secretariat, Authority on All Existence, Arbiter of Right, Toxic Globalist Dog, Dark Psychic Vampire, and Chief Populist Elitist!
Separatist Peoples should RESIGN!

User avatar
Dragonslinding WA Mission
Envoy
 
Posts: 330
Founded: May 28, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Dragonslinding WA Mission » Mon Nov 27, 2017 7:12 am

Ser Aegon Snow: "The Dragonslinding delegation votes against this proposal."
Ser Aegon Snow: Chief Ambassador of HM Government to the WA.
Ser Dawrin Stone: Assistant Ambassador of HM Government to the WA

Please note that Ser is a title not a name. It denotes that both of these gentlemen have been knighted


We creatively comply with a number of WA resolutions, check out our factbook on the matter if you'd like to know more.

Cisgendered, homosexual white male. Classically liberal/libertarian, this nation does not reflect my actual political positions.

User avatar
United Massachusetts
Minister
 
Posts: 2574
Founded: Jan 17, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby United Massachusetts » Mon Nov 27, 2017 3:34 pm

I've responded to several major arguments against in the repeal thread:

viewtopic.php?f=9&t=429339&p=32980845#p32980845

User avatar
Yaroslov
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 2
Founded: Nov 13, 2017
Ex-Nation

Economy?

Postby Yaroslov » Mon Nov 27, 2017 4:22 pm

Will this law affect my countries economy? I voted against this law because of that reason

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to WA Archives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads