Advertisement
by Lederland » Sun Oct 08, 2017 11:20 pm
by Yohannes » Sun Oct 08, 2017 11:24 pm
by Attempted Socialism » Sun Oct 08, 2017 11:35 pm
Represented in the World Assembly by Ambassador Robert Mortimer Pride, called The Regicide Assume OOC unless otherwise indicated. My WA Authorship. | Cui Bono, quod seipsos custodes custodiunt? Bobberino: "The academic tone shines through." | Who am I in real life, my opinions and notes My NS career |
by Araraukar » Mon Oct 09, 2017 1:10 am
Wallenburg wrote:Why did GenSec allow this to come to vote?
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by Green Borneo » Mon Oct 09, 2017 1:43 am
by A m e n r i a » Mon Oct 09, 2017 1:46 am
by Imperial Polk County » Mon Oct 09, 2017 3:07 am
by Willania Imperium » Mon Oct 09, 2017 3:11 am
Imperial Polk County wrote:Drane gets to the third "REGOGNIZING" and stops. "What the hell? Don't you snowbirds know how to spell-check a document before submitting it? I don't care what the rest of it says or how wonderful it might be for the world community, I'm voting against this."
by The Bible Baptist Republic » Mon Oct 09, 2017 4:11 am
by Separatist Peoples » Mon Oct 09, 2017 4:34 am
Wallenburg wrote:Why did GenSec allow this to come to vote?
by Wrapper » Mon Oct 09, 2017 4:38 am
Wallenburg wrote:Why did GenSec allow this to come to vote?
by Candlewhisper Archive » Mon Oct 09, 2017 5:04 am
Format: Other universal standards for all General Assembly proposals.
Operative Clause: Every proposal has to have some recognizable effect on member nations, such as requiring them to take action or encouraging them to support a policy change.
Language: Proposals must use understandable English. Conventional legalese and Latin terms are acceptable within reason. Proposals written in incomprehensible English or a foreign language will be deleted.
by Felniir » Mon Oct 09, 2017 5:13 am
by Bananaistan » Mon Oct 09, 2017 5:14 am
by Lederland » Mon Oct 09, 2017 5:34 am
by Sciongrad » Mon Oct 09, 2017 5:49 am
Wallenburg wrote:Why did GenSec allow this to come to vote?
by Wrapper » Mon Oct 09, 2017 6:08 am
Candlewhisper Archive wrote:"Understandable English".
Regognize is not English, thereforeit is illegal.
by Cyll » Mon Oct 09, 2017 6:22 am
by Ransium » Mon Oct 09, 2017 6:47 am
Wrapper wrote:Candlewhisper Archive wrote:"Understandable English".
Regognize is not English, thereforeit is illegal.
We've never ruled misspellings as "not English and therefore illegal". I'd be shocked if GenSec were to suddenly do so. I mean, "thereforeit" is not English and yet I understood what you were saying.
by Nerodanus » Mon Oct 09, 2017 6:56 am
by Oresland » Mon Oct 09, 2017 7:05 am
by Deropia » Mon Oct 09, 2017 7:18 am
Lederland wrote:"Lederland's stance on spelling has not changed. As such we vote against this attack on the English language. Lederland would also like to remind you that you will never live up to what your mother wanted and you've wasted your lives."
Lieutenant-Commander Jason MacAlister Deropian Ambassador to the World Assembly macalister.j@diplomats.com Office 1302, 13th Floor, World Assembly Headquarters | Minister of WA Affairs [TNP] Captain, North Pacific Army Special Forces Former Speaker of the Regional Assembly [TNP] |
by Candlewhisper Archive » Mon Oct 09, 2017 7:29 am
Ransium wrote:Wrapper wrote:We've never ruled misspellings as "not English and therefore illegal". I'd be shocked if GenSec were to suddenly do so. I mean, "thereforeit" is not English and yet I understood what you were saying.
OCC:
It was part of the joke. CWA doesn't make grammatical errors that elementary, unless its a certain contraction.
by Wallenburg » Mon Oct 09, 2017 7:40 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement