Sierra Lyricalia wrote:Libervalley wrote:The only reason for any government to legally sanction the union of two people is to promote procreation. Government sanction of same-sex marriage does not accomplish that goal. The government has power to make laws but equality can only be derived from natural law.
"If that were true, marriage of elderly people would be likewise prohibited, and younger couples would have to undergo fertility tests before they could march down the aisle. Since neither of these things is true, this argument is full of shit."
"Also, what the hell is 'natural law?' You know law is something we made up, right? Without a sapient mind to invent it and write it down, there's no such thing as law. The phrase 'natural law' is an oxymoron, ambassador. Just because you happen to see a couple of patterns across certain aspects of biological life doesn't mean you can make up norms to impose on sapient beings. In short, ambassador, take that argument and stick it in the shredder. It's a primitive waste of time, energy, paper, and ink."
"Now, that doesn't make this proposal good and worth passing, of course; it's just that most of the arguments against it came from a garbage fire."
Not really, it's logically contradictory. Sure, you get the fluffers who just read what it's about without any understanding of the history of the WA, but It's got blatant misspellings, clauses that contradict one another, etc.
Also, you presume their country DOESN'T Prohibit the marriage of Elderly People or the Infertile. My country does. Of course we also prohibit the Marriage of everyone else, because love is stupid.