NationStates

He Qixin 2 wrote:

Araraukar wrote:

Also, there's nothing Uan can do anymore to "be careful". A proposal cannot be withdrawn by author once it enters the voting stage. They also can't be edited after submitting, which is why your habit of spamming the submissions list with your own is so annoying. Also, I hope you've paid attention and realized that this drafting thread has existed for four months and is still in trouble, content-wise (regardless of what happens in the vote, because "sustainable" is a good feel-good word for people who vote based on proposal names).

"Oops, I meant 'to be wary of', thanks for the correcting," says jacknjellify.

---

Araraukar wrote:

"In my opinion this was submitted too soon after the change of direction; a couple of days are not long enough to gather replies from those who weren't paying it attention before, because they thought it fell outside of their area of expertize. Since the Grand Nation of Araraukar is against the ham-fisted attempts at industrial encouragement by the WA, our vote will be against"

OOC: agreed

MegaLand Union wrote:What are the prohibitions nations have to abide by, it never states them, instead using vague wording like "sustainable"

Araraukar wrote:

He Qixin 2 wrote:"Oops, I meant 'to be wary of', thanks for the correcting," says jacknjellify.

---

OOC: agreed

OOC: Do you understand that "OOC" means "out of character"? You managed to reply in IC (in-character) to an OOC comment (which makes no sense as your IC character can't see/hear OOC stuff) and then replied in OOC to an IC comment. If you're doing that on purpose, it's getting very annoying. If you can't keep track of what comments are IC and what OOC, it's perhaps best for you to stick to OOC.

He Qixin 2 wrote:OOC: Sorry, I'm relatively new to RP and don't know you can't reply OOC with IC.

Araraukar wrote:OOC: Do you understand that "OOC" means "out of character"? You managed to reply in IC (in-character) to an OOC comment (which makes no sense as your IC character can't see/hear OOC stuff)

Araraukar wrote:and then replied in OOC to an IC comment.

Imperium Anglorum wrote:Oh wait, you said it wasn't impossible over here. Which is it?

My Fellow Delegates and Ambassadors,
The Commonwealth of Austenesia has never wavered in its support for taking meaningful and comprehensive actions that protect the environments of our respective countries. We are proud of the fact that we have some the best programs and regulations designed to protect our own natural resources and treasures, ensuring the health of our communities and the preservation of these natural gems for future generations. And we are proud to say that, unlike in many political systems, environmental protection is not seen as a partisan issue and more often than not, one of the issues many of our political groups can support wholeheartedly.

I would like to commend Uan aa Boa’s World Assembly delegation for their noble intentions in proposing this resolution. As a nation blessed with forests of our own, we are fully aware of how important forest preservation is to the environmental health of eco-systems all across the world. However, that said, we have some concerns about this resolution as proposed to the World Assembly in its present form.

First, we have concerns that this resolution will, in effect, hurt poorer nations that do not have the technology or political willpower to enact substantial environmental reforms. When poor states, who rely primarily on exported cheap timber, are faced with this boycott, this will only serve to further destabilize their economies which could very well lead to new immigration crises and worse, political instability and war as governments collapse.

Secondly, we feel that banning non-WAFC approved timber from being sold or distributed in World Assembly member states will only serve to provide black markets with another commodity to illegally trade and sell, further bolstering their organizations which also serve to spread crime and degradation throughout our societies.

Thirdly, we feel that these new regulations will make it only harder for furniture manufacturers as they will now have to get WAFC approval for all goods they sell to ensure they qualify with the provisions of this resolution. This will provide an undue burden on these manufacturers, many of whom (at least in our country) are middle class craftsmen or women who rely on their livelihood to pay their bills and would be put out of business by being forced to acquire approval for all products they craft and sell. In Austenesia, we work to discourage purchasing cheap timber from countries who ignore the World Assembly’s logging standards by giving them a special certification and promoting their services to give them a distinct edge over their competitors.

We feel that the best way forward for the World Assembly is to reject this resolution as written. The process of getting WAFC approval for every single lumber operation and manufactured product is one that will be burdensome, slow, and harmful to the economies of many member states. Instead, we believe World Assembly member nations should follow our example and address this issue on a national level alone by either incentivizing environmentally friendly logging practices or penalizing them in their own way through the responsible use of tariffs. Ideally, we would propose a tariff system instead of an all-out boycott and any tariff revenues generated can be used to support poorer nations who need financial assistance in helping institute better environmentally friendly forestry practices.

Therefore, the Commonwealth of Austenesia respectfully votes against this resolution.

Uan aa Boa wrote:Category: Advancement of Industry
Area of Effect: Protective Tariffs

Hereby

Prohibits member nations from importing from any source timber, or products made from timber, produced in a way not compliant with World Assembly legislation;

• "Promoting - to help or encourage to exist or flourish;"
• "Encourage - to inspire with courage, spirit, or confidence"
• "Prohibits - to forbid (an action, activity, etc.) by authority or law."

House Mar wrote:The traditional quill and parchment of the Queen's WA response was eschewed for a life size replica of the Queen of House Mar producing up crude and insulting gestures. She had been assured that the slab was illegally harvested from an ancient tree in a protected Bigtopian national park, and found the cost of its origin worth the price it cost, as it served to make her point all the better.

Being unskilled in the in woodworking herself, Yonda Mir issues her missive by dictation to a union carpenter who elegantly carves her words into a sassy slab of lumber.

• "Promoting - to help or encourage to exist or flourish;"
• "Encourage - to inspire with courage, spirit, or confidence"
• "Prohibits - to forbid (an action, activity, etc.) by authority or law."

Yonda Mir read aloud to from the Grendle on her desk, she sweeps the digital encyclopedia and stood up to inspect her two-and-a-half-dimensional replica. "By seeking to compel, rather than to promote as suggested in the flowery language; the Dominion of House Mar rejects the proposal, and casts a vote against the bill currently on the floor."

He Qixin 2 wrote:"Surely you can't vote 'Against' just because of a mismatched word? Why did you do that?" asks jacknjellify. He sounds really frustrated right now.

He Qixin 2 wrote:

House Mar wrote:The traditional quill and parchment of the Queen's WA response was eschewed for a life size replica of the Queen of House Mar producing up crude and insulting gestures. She had been assured that the slab was illegally harvested from an ancient tree in a protected Bigtopian national park, and found the cost of its origin worth the price it cost, as it served to make her point all the better.

Being unskilled in the in woodworking herself, Yonda Mir issues her missive by dictation to a union carpenter who elegantly carves her words into a sassy slab of lumber.

• "Promoting - to help or encourage to exist or flourish;"
• "Encourage - to inspire with courage, spirit, or confidence"
• "Prohibits - to forbid (an action, activity, etc.) by authority or law."

Yonda Mir read aloud to from the Grendle on her desk, she sweeps the digital encyclopedia and stood up to inspect her two-and-a-half-dimensional replica. "By seeking to compel, rather than to promote as suggested in the flowery language; the Dominion of House Mar rejects the proposal, and casts a vote against the bill currently on the floor."

"Surely you can't vote 'Against' just because of a mismatched word? Why did you do that?" asks jacknjellify. He sounds really frustrated right now.

Kimderlopia wrote:I'd rather decide all of this myself. Putting excess red tape, not only costs money, but reduces productivity. I know I'm thinking socially conservatively, but I trust member nations to put appropriate legislation in place so I can manage my forests in the best way possible. I'm all for being green, but I don't think this is the way to do it.

Promoting Sustainable Timber was passed 11,707 votes to 6,787.

Wrapper wrote:

Promoting Sustainable Timber was passed 11,707 votes to 6,787.