NationStates

Wrapper wrote:Ugh, way too many errors here. Guy deserves a better effort.

These errors were removed, but the drafts got mixed up. I currently see one error in there, is it possible that mods can edit proposals? I really don't want to withdraw it because of a missing space.

Marilyn Manson Freaks wrote:

Wrapper wrote:Ugh, way too many errors here. Guy deserves a better effort.

These errors were removed, but the drafts got mixed up. I currently see one error in there, is it possible that mods can edit proposals? I really don't want to withdraw it because of a missing space.

Not posting a ruling since I posted earlier in the thread, but from my recollection mods have never edited submitted proposals. I don't think that it's a tool available to game mods from what I can see.

Mallorea and Riva wrote:

Marilyn Manson Freaks wrote:
These errors were removed, but the drafts got mixed up. I currently see one error in there, is it possible that mods can edit proposals? I really don't want to withdraw it because of a missing space.

Not posting a ruling since I posted earlier in the thread, but from my recollection mods have never edited submitted proposals. I don't think that it's a tool available to game mods from what I can see.

That sucks. I had the full, edited version on a Google Doc, and probably was too liberal with the copy and paste functions on mobile, pasting the old one on place of the new draft. I recognize these few mistakes and still hope that the meat of the proposal will garner support.

Marilyn Manson Freaks wrote:

Mallorea and Riva wrote:Not posting a ruling since I posted earlier in the thread, but from my recollection mods have never edited submitted proposals. I don't think that it's a tool available to game mods from what I can see.

That sucks. I had the full, edited version on a Google Doc, and probably was too liberal with the copy and paste functions on mobile, pasting the old one on place of the new draft. I recognize these few mistakes and still hope that the meat of the proposal will garner support.

Why not just withdraw it and resubmit?

Mallorea and Riva wrote:

Marilyn Manson Freaks wrote:
That sucks. I had the full, edited version on a Google Doc, and probably was too liberal with the copy and paste functions on mobile, pasting the old one on place of the new draft. I recognize these few mistakes and still hope that the meat of the proposal will garner support.

Why not just withdraw it and resubmit?

I mean, Mall is right MM. Just withdraw and submit the edited, better version. It took me four times with Commend Texas, so once for Commend Guy should be okay

Mallorea and Riva wrote:

Marilyn Manson Freaks wrote:
That sucks. I had the full, edited version on a Google Doc, and probably was too liberal with the copy and paste functions on mobile, pasting the old one on place of the new draft. I recognize these few mistakes and still hope that the meat of the proposal will garner support.

Why not just withdraw it and resubmit?

I have 70+ approvals, if I withdraw it, I will lose them all.

I have already sent out manually telegrams and automated telegrams. I feel if I withdraw it again people will feel discouraged to approve it because I'll have to send out even more telegrams to them again.

Marilyn Manson Freaks wrote:

Mallorea and Riva wrote:Why not just withdraw it and resubmit?

I have 70+ approvals, if I withdraw it, I will lose them all.

I have already sent out manually telegrams and automated telegrams. I feel if I withdraw it again people will feel discouraged to approve it because I'll have to send out even more telegrams to them again.

Sure beats having TNP stomp against with nearly 1.2k votes.

Mallorea and Riva wrote:

Marilyn Manson Freaks wrote:
I have 70+ approvals, if I withdraw it, I will lose them all.

I have already sent out manually telegrams and automated telegrams. I feel if I withdraw it again people will feel discouraged to approve it because I'll have to send out even more telegrams to them again.

Sure beats having TNP stomp against with nearly 1.2k votes.

True, what do you suggest I do upon withdrawing it and editing it? What should I include in the telegrams?

Marilyn Manson Freaks wrote:I have 70+ approvals, if I withdraw it, I will lose them all.

You currently have 27 approvals. It's too bad you rushed submission and your campaign, but it clearly needs some work before resubmission. Several of us were reluctant to mark it legal. It could stand additional input.

Frisbeeteria wrote:

Marilyn Manson Freaks wrote:I have 70+ approvals, if I withdraw it, I will lose them all.

You currently have 27 approvals. It's too bad you rushed submission and your campaign, but it clearly needs some work before resubmission. Several of us were reluctant to mark it legal. It could stand additional input.

I asked some others for editing help and they saw nothing wrong after I revised it a bit. What do you think is wrong with it now?

After reading this, with its well-composed format and immense evidential backings (unlike some other resolutions the WASC had to deal with recently) I've personally voted for. The Fourth Republic of The League of Conservative Nations is currently voting about 88.9% in favour, but if I am able to, I will attempt to convene our Citizens' Assembly to discuss the topic. While our votes and endorsement, either way, will likely have a little impact on the vote, if the CA favourably looks upon it, our WAD will vote in favour and the government will endorse that direction of voting.

Quebecshire wrote:After reading this, with its well-composed format and immense evidential backings (unlike some other resolutions the WASC had to deal with recently) I've personally voted for. The Fourth Republic of The League of Conservative Nations is currently voting about 88.9% in favour, but if I am able to, I will attempt to convene our Citizens' Assembly to discuss the topic. While our votes and endorsement, either way, will likely have a little impact on the vote, if the CA favourably looks upon it, our WAD will vote in favour and the government will endorse that direction of voting.

Thank you. Guy definitely deserves this commendation!

Fauxia wrote:People will vote against for mentions of the FRA...

What is this about? Please clarify. Thank you.

State of SouthCarolina wrote:

Fauxia wrote:People will vote against for mentions of the FRA...

What is this about? Please clarify. Thank you.

The FRA is a dead defending organization that at one point was the face of defending.

Wow... What a guy!

We are happy to support a person who defends with honor and has so many honors! I am happy to say yes to this proposal!