Advertisement
by Ever-Wandering Souls » Mon Aug 21, 2017 9:51 am
The Alicorns (Equestria) wrote:Let them stay, no need to badmouth them...From our view a bunch of nations just came in, seized the delegate position, and changed a few superficial things...we play NationStates differently...there's really no reason for us to be butthurt.
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8944227
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8951258
Reploid Productions wrote:Raiders are endlessly creative
by Benevolent Thomas » Mon Aug 21, 2017 10:08 am
Ever-Wandering Souls wrote:I would be happy to also argue that those are the actions of a single member of the region, and that they'd be more fitting for a personal commendation rather than a regional one, if that's be appropriate?
Ballotonia wrote:Personally, I think there's something seriously wrong with a game if it willfully allows the destruction of longtime player communities in favor of kids whose sole purpose is to enjoy ruining the game for others.
by Gig em Aggies » Mon Aug 21, 2017 10:37 am
Ever-Wandering Souls wrote:I would be happy to also argue that those are the actions of a single member of the region, and that they'd be more fitting for a personal commendation rather than a regional one, if that's be appropriate?
by Ever-Wandering Souls » Mon Aug 21, 2017 11:59 am
Benevolent Thomas wrote:Ever-Wandering Souls wrote:I would be happy to also argue that those are the actions of a single member of the region, and that they'd be more fitting for a personal commendation rather than a regional one, if that's be appropriate?
That would be your best argument for repealing the Texas commendation, in my mind. Proving that BT is shouldering most of the accomplishments of the region and pointing out that BT's individual commendation also includes most of the same feats while also being a considerably superior piece of legislation would improve your odds of success.
Gig em Aggies wrote:Ever-Wandering Souls wrote:I would be happy to also argue that those are the actions of a single member of the region, and that they'd be more fitting for a personal commendation rather than a regional one, if that's be appropriate?
but considering your part of a raider region you would rejoice in getting a major defender regions commendation taken away. plus if this passed it could also mean any commendations you receive could be taken away just as easily just because someone doesn't like you or your region. If it weren't for are many nations who helped other regions defend against raiders then we wouldn't be well respected or commended BigTex cant run a region and defend others all by himself so in effect the commendation is for all nations residing in Texas. like other repeal legislations that I have seen yours has no valid points to warrant removal of the commendation or even a downgrade for that matter. I feel this is a personal vendetta against a defender region that's well known and respected.
The Alicorns (Equestria) wrote:Let them stay, no need to badmouth them...From our view a bunch of nations just came in, seized the delegate position, and changed a few superficial things...we play NationStates differently...there's really no reason for us to be butthurt.
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8944227
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8951258
Reploid Productions wrote:Raiders are endlessly creative
by Gig em Aggies » Mon Aug 21, 2017 12:03 pm
Ever-Wandering Souls wrote:Benevolent Thomas wrote:That would be your best argument for repealing the Texas commendation, in my mind. Proving that BT is shouldering most of the accomplishments of the region and pointing out that BT's individual commendation also includes most of the same feats while also being a considerably superior piece of legislation would improve your odds of success.
Alright, edits incoming later to add a look at that as well.Gig em Aggies wrote:but considering your part of a raider region you would rejoice in getting a major defender regions commendation taken away. plus if this passed it could also mean any commendations you receive could be taken away just as easily just because someone doesn't like you or your region. If it weren't for are many nations who helped other regions defend against raiders then we wouldn't be well respected or commended BigTex cant run a region and defend others all by himself so in effect the commendation is for all nations residing in Texas. like other repeal legislations that I have seen yours has no valid points to warrant removal of the commendation or even a downgrade for that matter. I feel this is a personal vendetta against a defender region that's well known and respected.
I'm also a former Roleplayer, and maintain a pin in the A&F section of the forums. Also, I'm not sure I'd even call this a "major defender commendation," considering only one line even mentions defending. Additionally, many defender aligned regions, including the leader in today's world of defending, have not been commended for the act of defending. If someone else would like to repeal either Condemn The Black Hawks, they are welcome to try, as others have before. I'm more likely to receive a condemn in the future than a commend, as well Perhaps you could write one for pushing this supposed evil agenda?
If no repeals have ever been valid, then your battle seems to have a larger scope than my resolutions.
I'm sorry you feel that way.
EDIT: If anything, I'm more likely to be motivated by y'all hating on the Tide than by my R/D alignmnet ;P
by Ever-Wandering Souls » Mon Aug 21, 2017 12:05 pm
Gig em Aggies wrote:come say that to my face ....oh wait don't bother yall be coming in September and that's when yall will be leaving with one less win. Whoop
The Alicorns (Equestria) wrote:Let them stay, no need to badmouth them...From our view a bunch of nations just came in, seized the delegate position, and changed a few superficial things...we play NationStates differently...there's really no reason for us to be butthurt.
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8944227
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8951258
Reploid Productions wrote:Raiders are endlessly creative
by 21st Century Egyptians » Mon Aug 21, 2017 12:10 pm
by Ever-Wandering Souls » Mon Aug 21, 2017 12:11 pm
21st Century Egyptians wrote:Gig em Aggies wrote:come say that to my face ....oh wait don't bother yall be coming in September and that's when yall will be leaving with one less win. Whoop
Wow this conduct of diplomacy in a mature manner by their Secretary of World Assembly Affairs definitely shows this region as a role-model worth emulating.
The Alicorns (Equestria) wrote:Let them stay, no need to badmouth them...From our view a bunch of nations just came in, seized the delegate position, and changed a few superficial things...we play NationStates differently...there's really no reason for us to be butthurt.
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8944227
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8951258
Reploid Productions wrote:Raiders are endlessly creative
by RiderSyl » Mon Aug 21, 2017 12:13 pm
Gig em Aggies wrote:come say that to my face ....oh wait don't bother yall be coming in September and that's when yall will be leaving with one less win. Whoop
by Gig em Aggies » Mon Aug 21, 2017 12:20 pm
Ever-Wandering Souls wrote:21st Century Egyptians wrote:
Wow this conduct of diplomacy in a mature manner by their Secretary of World Assembly Affairs definitely shows this region as a role-model worth emulating.
It is certainly assisting with proving my point that the line "APPRECIATING the region's conduct of diplomacy in a mature manner" has it's flaws, yes.
by Ever-Wandering Souls » Mon Aug 21, 2017 12:23 pm
Gig em Aggies wrote:Ever-Wandering Souls wrote:
It is certainly assisting with proving my point that the line "APPRECIATING the region's conduct of diplomacy in a mature manner" has it's flaws, yes.
no that wasn't my NS diplomacy side it was just my personal side outside of NS about the upcoming game between A&M and Bama. But this still doesn't prove your point at repealing the commendation for the entire region. all regions of NS have a new guy whos learning and that's what I am
The Alicorns (Equestria) wrote:Let them stay, no need to badmouth them...From our view a bunch of nations just came in, seized the delegate position, and changed a few superficial things...we play NationStates differently...there's really no reason for us to be butthurt.
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8944227
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8951258
Reploid Productions wrote:Raiders are endlessly creative
by Gig em Aggies » Mon Aug 21, 2017 12:25 pm
by Benevolent Thomas » Mon Aug 21, 2017 12:30 pm
Ballotonia wrote:Personally, I think there's something seriously wrong with a game if it willfully allows the destruction of longtime player communities in favor of kids whose sole purpose is to enjoy ruining the game for others.
by Gig em Aggies » Mon Aug 21, 2017 12:32 pm
Benevolent Thomas wrote:Gig, they're clearly trying to rile you up as anyone can clearly see that post was OOC fun banter concerning college sports. Remember to add a when doing such things so that you may not be taken out of context. It would have also done you better to quote purely the OOC part of Souls' post.
by Fauxia » Mon Aug 21, 2017 1:30 pm
by Ransium » Mon Aug 21, 2017 2:33 pm
Fauxia wrote:Texas has built some pretty informative tools, and we've commended regions for writing lots and lots of resolutions before (IDU)
by Fauxia » Mon Aug 21, 2017 2:34 pm
I swear it was. Maybe it was just a proposal
by Unibot III » Mon Aug 21, 2017 5:13 pm
Ransium wrote:IDU has not been commended.
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by Studly Penguins » Mon Aug 21, 2017 5:39 pm
Ever-Wandering Souls wrote:Gig em Aggies wrote:no that wasn't my NS diplomacy side it was just my personal side outside of NS about the upcoming game between A&M and Bama. But this still doesn't prove your point at repealing the commendation for the entire region. all regions of NS have a new guy whos learning and that's what I am
Regardless, you are as you have stated, an official representative of the region in this thread.
Additionally, claiming you're new when you ran on a platform that stated "I Gig em Aggies have been a part of this fine Region for many years" and cited experience from your "past several TRC posts over the last few years" seems a bit silly.
by Seahassee » Mon Aug 21, 2017 6:00 pm
Gig em Aggies wrote:no that wasn't my NS diplomacy side it was just my personal side outside of NS about the upcoming game between A&M and Bama. But this still doesn't prove your point at repealing the commendation for the entire region. all regions of NS have a new guy whos learning and that's what I am
Gig em Aggies wrote:no you may say that as an outsider but within Texas itself I am a well respected member ive been part of the regional leadership for several years now but the WA Affairs Secretary is new to me so I'll be learning as I go. but back to the actual point none of my actions will prove any point that a repeal of the commendation will succeed to get even enough votes to get to the SC floor. to further the point I do not serve the WA or the SC I serve Texas and it is only they
Gig em Aggies wrote:come say that to my face ....oh wait don't bother yall be coming in September and that's when yall will be leaving with one less win. Whoop
by Reventus Koth » Mon Aug 21, 2017 7:07 pm
Studly Penguins wrote:Ever-Wandering Souls wrote:
Regardless, you are as you have stated, an official representative of the region in this thread.
Additionally, claiming you're new when you ran on a platform that stated "I Gig em Aggies have been a part of this fine Region for many years" and cited experience from your "past several TRC posts over the last few years" seems a bit silly.
While you are most certainly entitled to your opinion repealing a commendation is a bit far for having hurt feelings. Did things go a little far on the Texas RMB perhaps, but explain to me why you felt the need to come to Texas uninvited and try to start a dialogue? What BT wrote in that post announcing the vote for your condemnation is basically the exact same thing he writes every time there is a condemn SC proposal at vote.
We have consistently voted AGAINST condemning anyone; why are you the first person to come and want to talk about it? Just another reason why personally I feel the Security Council is a joke.
You are (or were) an invader that came to a defender region's RMB uninvited. Expecting to have an "open" minded discourse would be like me engaging the Black Hawks, DEN, etc and asking them to be cool with defenders.
On to other topics Benevolent Thomas is correct in their view that BT is what makes Texas what it is and therefore the main reason why it was a Regional commendation. He's one of a handful of people that are still here and as active now as they were when this game first launched.
The Studly Penguins delegation is staunchly opposed to this repeal solely on the merit of it. If this repeal was drafted more from the position of "I feel this needs repealed" rather than "I went to a defender region trying to stir it up and got my feelings hurt" then maybe this wouldn't reek of sour grapes.
Yours,
Hiram Fox
Lt Governor of Texas
Former WA Secretary
Xanthal wrote:Only raiders can win in this war- a defender can keep them from winning one region, one update at a time, but there will always be the next region, the next update, and the next, forever.
by Cormactopia Prime » Mon Aug 21, 2017 7:16 pm
Reventus Koth wrote:Uh, dude? Ever-Wandering Souls isn't me. You get an F on your research assignment.
by Fauxia » Mon Aug 21, 2017 8:27 pm
You aren't Souls?!!! Everything I ever thought about NS is wrong!!! I think I have to quit.Reventus Koth wrote:Studly Penguins wrote:
While you are most certainly entitled to your opinion repealing a commendation is a bit far for having hurt feelings. Did things go a little far on the Texas RMB perhaps, but explain to me why you felt the need to come to Texas uninvited and try to start a dialogue? What BT wrote in that post announcing the vote for your condemnation is basically the exact same thing he writes every time there is a condemn SC proposal at vote.
We have consistently voted AGAINST condemning anyone; why are you the first person to come and want to talk about it? Just another reason why personally I feel the Security Council is a joke.
You are (or were) an invader that came to a defender region's RMB uninvited. Expecting to have an "open" minded discourse would be like me engaging the Black Hawks, DEN, etc and asking them to be cool with defenders.
On to other topics Benevolent Thomas is correct in their view that BT is what makes Texas what it is and therefore the main reason why it was a Regional commendation. He's one of a handful of people that are still here and as active now as they were when this game first launched.
The Studly Penguins delegation is staunchly opposed to this repeal solely on the merit of it. If this repeal was drafted more from the position of "I feel this needs repealed" rather than "I went to a defender region trying to stir it up and got my feelings hurt" then maybe this wouldn't reek of sour grapes.
Yours,
Hiram Fox
Lt Governor of Texas
Former WA Secretary
Uh, dude? Ever-Wandering Souls isn't me. You get an F on your research assignment.
by Gig em Aggies » Mon Aug 21, 2017 8:38 pm
Cormactopia Prime wrote:Reventus Koth wrote:Uh, dude? Ever-Wandering Souls isn't me. You get an F on your research assignment.
Oh you raiders, you're all the same though. </sarcasm>
Is it possible to use the conduct of Texas' membership right now in this very thread as a point in favor of repeal? Because yikes.
by Greater Cesnica » Mon Aug 21, 2017 8:41 pm
Gig em Aggies wrote:Ever-Wandering Souls wrote:
Alright, edits incoming later to add a look at that as well.
I'm also a former Roleplayer, and maintain a pin in the A&F section of the forums. Also, I'm not sure I'd even call this a "major defender commendation," considering only one line even mentions defending. Additionally, many defender aligned regions, including the leader in today's world of defending, have not been commended for the act of defending. If someone else would like to repeal either Condemn The Black Hawks, they are welcome to try, as others have before. I'm more likely to receive a condemn in the future than a commend, as well Perhaps you could write one for pushing this supposed evil agenda?
If no repeals have ever been valid, then your battle seems to have a larger scope than my resolutions.
I'm sorry you feel that way.
EDIT: If anything, I'm more likely to be motivated by y'all hating on the Tide than by my R/D alignmnet ;P
come say that to my face ....oh wait don't bother yall be coming in September and that's when yall will be leaving with one less win. Whoop
Sic Semper Tyrannis.
WA Discord Server
Authorship Dispatch
WA Ambassador: Slick McCooley
Firearm Rights are Human Rights
privacytools.io - Use these tools to safeguard your online activities, freedoms, and safety
My IFAK and Booboo Kit Starter Guide!
novemberstars#8888 on Discord
San Lumen wrote:You are ridiculous.George Orwell wrote:“That rifle on the wall of the labourer's cottage or working class flat is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there.”
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement