Chingis wrote:Full support. Maybe add the numbers for Union of Fash nations, for wow factor?
Certainly.
Advertisement
by Digory Kirke » Tue Aug 22, 2017 9:11 pm
Chingis wrote:Full support. Maybe add the numbers for Union of Fash nations, for wow factor?
by Digory Kirke » Wed Aug 23, 2017 5:11 pm
by Willania Imperium » Wed Aug 23, 2017 5:26 pm
by Fauxia » Wed Aug 23, 2017 6:14 pm
I don't either, except that commendations and condemnations are "not worth voting for until voting for" for me. Still, I support
by Digory Kirke » Thu Aug 24, 2017 4:10 pm
by Kanglia » Sat Aug 26, 2017 1:49 pm
by Ransium » Sun Aug 27, 2017 3:12 pm
by Honeydewistania » Tue Aug 29, 2017 2:53 am
Alger wrote:if you have egoquotes in your signature, touch grass
by Digory Kirke » Tue Aug 29, 2017 4:07 am
Honeydewistania wrote:I'm against.
The JTF have caused more damage than it did good.
by Kanglia » Tue Aug 29, 2017 1:01 pm
Honeydewistania wrote:I'm against.
The JTF have caused more damage than it did good.
by Digory Kirke » Tue Aug 29, 2017 1:05 pm
by Manaime » Tue Aug 29, 2017 1:08 pm
Honeydewistania wrote:I'm against.
The JTF have caused more damage than it did good.
by Kanglia » Tue Aug 29, 2017 1:18 pm
Manaime wrote:Honeydewistania wrote:I'm against.
The JTF have caused more damage than it did good.
No, they actually didn't. The JTF may have been raiders, but they did liberate some regions that were being disowned by one of their founders, including mines. So, your explanation doesn't really have an affect.
by Lord Dominator » Wed Aug 30, 2017 3:51 pm
by Aclion » Wed Aug 30, 2017 3:57 pm
by States of Glory » Wed Aug 30, 2017 4:02 pm
Aclion wrote:I'm disappointed that this will not be passed in August but that is my only complaint.
by Drasnia » Wed Aug 30, 2017 5:20 pm
Aclion wrote:I'm disappointed that this will not be passed in August but that is my only complaint.
by Lord Dominator » Wed Aug 30, 2017 5:22 pm
Drasnia wrote:Aclion wrote:I'm disappointed that this will not be passed in August but that is my only complaint.
We can always commend September instead.
by Pallaith » Thu Aug 31, 2017 12:05 am
by Digory Kirke » Thu Aug 31, 2017 4:06 am
Pallaith wrote:I'm surprised no one has remarked on the fact this commendation explicitly mentions the one-day event that just took place. It was my observation over the years that this group does not look fondly on resolutions that recognize these game events as part of the list of achievements. Are such things now on the table for commendations?
EDIT: It appears it may be referring to the first event, seeing as the alliance came in first both times. However, that makes the fact it was not pointed out earlier even more troublesome, as it's been there longer than just a few hours.
by Vincent Drake » Thu Aug 31, 2017 4:23 pm
by Fauxia » Thu Aug 31, 2017 7:02 pm
In the eyes of the World Assembly, I don't know if "winning" a nuclear war is very commendable...Vincent Drake wrote:Full Support.
Personally, I see no reason to remove the original N-day reference. I wouldn't add the new one, but leave the first. August was able to parlay a good result into massive gameside growth and interest in AA regions that stuck around for the long term. This is similar to how some regions saw a spike from the original Z-day, these mini-games can have real, lasting value in region-building. I would not categorically exclude them just because they are mini-games.
I find what August accomplished in the original to be far more commendworthy than many of the reasons players get commended. I mean, look at one of the other drafts, where one of the listed items is a guy temporarily disbanding his own region! We commend people for founding regions, writing issues, being elected to government positions...what August accomplished in N-day1 without any famous/giant regions in the faction and with mostly regular/puppetless players, is much more difficult than any of those, and to do it again shows a very rare and sustained standard of excellence.
by Digory Kirke » Thu Aug 31, 2017 7:24 pm
Fauxia wrote:In the eyes of the World Assembly, I don't know if "winning" a nuclear war is very commendable...Vincent Drake wrote:Full Support.
Personally, I see no reason to remove the original N-day reference. I wouldn't add the new one, but leave the first. August was able to parlay a good result into massive gameside growth and interest in AA regions that stuck around for the long term. This is similar to how some regions saw a spike from the original Z-day, these mini-games can have real, lasting value in region-building. I would not categorically exclude them just because they are mini-games.
I find what August accomplished in the original to be far more commendworthy than many of the reasons players get commended. I mean, look at one of the other drafts, where one of the listed items is a guy temporarily disbanding his own region! We commend people for founding regions, writing issues, being elected to government positions...what August accomplished in N-day1 without any famous/giant regions in the faction and with mostly regular/puppetless players, is much more difficult than any of those, and to do it again shows a very rare and sustained standard of excellence.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement