[DEFEATED] Condemn Wrektopia

by **Adytus** » Mon Jul 03, 2017 1:59 pm

Carlendale wrote:I have never laughed so hard at a Security Council proposal. This was absolutely fucking hysterical.

Thank you! I really appreciate it. :lol:

by **The Skrall** » Mon Jul 03, 2017 2:09 pm

This seems like a roleplay thing....build a wall around Wrektopia if they have so much trash that it's unbearable. Or just team up with the dozens of nations that hate Wrektopia, invade them, and force them to get rid of their trash. Or set the trash on fire and watch Wrektopia burn.

There are lots of other ways you could solve this problem, other than complaining to the World Assembly.

by **Occonago** » Mon Jul 03, 2017 2:20 pm

What exactly do you expect a condemnation to do?

This is probably what would happen:
World Assembly: "Stop hoarding trash, Wrektopia. We condemn you for this behavior."
Wrektopia: "No." *continues hoarding trash*
World Assembly: *does nothing*

This sounds like a nation that would see a condemnation as a prize.

by **The Greater Siriusian Domain** » Mon Jul 03, 2017 4:39 pm

So, the author wants to condemn Wrektopia for being a literal trash heap without any other reason?

Funny? Yes.

Valid? Hell no.

As much as I support #makelegislationfunnyagain, I'm going to have to vote no.

by **The Crentinite Archipelago** » Mon Jul 03, 2017 4:45 pm

Echoing the sentiments of others, as far as I'm concerned, this proposal is not appropriate for the Security Council, as a gameplay body. This is not valid here. I'm voting against it.

by **Frisbeeteria** » Mon Jul 03, 2017 7:32 pm

The Crentinite Archipelago wrote:this proposal is not appropriate for the Security Council, as a gameplay body.

When did Gameplayers get exclusive use of the SC? It's available to all aspects of all nations. If someone comes up with a Commendation for best ConLang or Tank Design and convinces people to vote for it, more power to them!

by **Wallenburg** » Mon Jul 03, 2017 9:03 pm

The Crentinite Archipelago wrote:Echoing the sentiments of others, as far as I'm concerned, this proposal is not appropriate for the Security Council, as a gameplay body. This is not valid here. I'm voting against it.

This gameplay supremacist attitude is one of the many reasons the SC community is nearly nonexistent. You would do best to recognize that roleplay-based resolutions are valid and can be quite good (Commend Separatist Peoples comes to mind).

by **Fawkenia** » Mon Jul 03, 2017 10:59 pm

This resolution certainly reminds me of a film where excessive pollution of a city led the government to lock that city into a dome. Now, is this resolution related to PR issues? Not stated at all.

I vote against because we should not condemn a nation based on the justifications outlined here.

In one way or another, I want to congratulate the editor, for the intention and for the amusing sense that many of us have found in this resolution -as I could read in previous replies-.

:clap:

by **States of Glory** » Tue Jul 04, 2017 6:12 am

Insert obligatory 'this proposal is a Wrek' joke here.

Against, but thanks for the laugh.

by **United Areas of Conservatives** » Tue Jul 04, 2017 4:35 pm

Please note that this is an international committee, not a recycling plant.

by **Warwik** » Tue Jul 04, 2017 7:39 pm

Give credence to the RP? Sure, we can do that.

=======================================

To the assembled Delegates of the Security Council, greetings:

Given the lack of evidence submitted to back up the frankly incredulous claim that short of mass dispersals of plutonium into the jet stream Wrektopia could POSSIBLY be responsible for mass species extinction in numerous neighboring countries, and suggesting that if the sponsoring nations are that exercised over the fate of Wrektopia's citizens they offer them sanctuary within their own borders, both as a WA member and the WA Delegate for the region of Wintreath, the Kingdom of Warwik can do no other but to oppose this mystifying "proposal."

For her serene grace Beryl val Almareth, Queen of Warwik,

Sir Cazin dy Tolnoxo,
Chancellor of Warwik

by **Ithreland** » Tue Jul 04, 2017 10:15 pm

This is hilarious. None of the numbers match up. The only negatively trending nation on the list is Yunoa, and when it went down, Wrektopia remained the same at 7.09.

Against and surprised this wasn't released 1/1/2018.

by **RiderSyl** » Wed Jul 05, 2017 9:24 am

Ithreland wrote:This is hilarious. None of the numbers match up. The only negatively trending nation on the list is Yunoa, and when it went down, Wrektopia remained the same at 7.09.

Against and surprised this wasn't released 1/1/2018.

Or 4/1/2018. :lol:

by **DJ Raid** » Wed Jul 05, 2017 11:35 am

Frisbeeteria wrote:
The Crentinite Archipelago wrote:this proposal is not appropriate for the Security Council, as a gameplay body.

When did Gameplayers get exclusive use of the SC? It's available to all aspects of all nations. If someone comes up with a Commendation for best ConLang or Tank Design and convinces people to vote for it, more power to them!

This.

As a gameplayer, the SC is getting a bit boring and it's cool to see some sort of roleplay to spice it up. Cool stuff.

by **Imperium Anglorum** » Wed Jul 05, 2017 12:54 pm

Ridersyl wrote:Or 4/1/2018.

Why would it be released the 4th of January?

by **RiderSyl** » Wed Jul 05, 2017 12:59 pm

Imperium Anglorum wrote:
Ridersyl wrote:Or 4/1/2018.

Why would it be released the 4th of January?

M/D/YYYY, not D/M/YYYY.

by **Serrus** » Wed Jul 05, 2017 4:35 pm

I would actually love to see more of these RP condemnations and commendations. Gameplayers have held this forum for too long! Let the roleplayers...do what they need to do!

by **Consular** » Wed Jul 05, 2017 8:10 pm

This isn't even a good RP condemnation though.

by **Drasnia** » Wed Jul 05, 2017 8:19 pm

Serrus wrote:I would actually love to see more of these RP condemnations and commendations. Gameplayers have held this forum for too long! Let the roleplayers...do what they need to do!

I am absolutely all for C&Cing players from other parts of NS apart from GP, but those people that are C&Cd need to be worthy candidates, else you weaken those C&Cs of players who truly are deserving of them. There needs to be a certain standard of quality, both in the quality of the candidate and of the writing. While the writing in this is strong, the candidate is not. Thus I have voted against this (not to mention there was no drafting thread for this and BBD - not the author - had to post a discussion thread when it made it to vote).

by **RiderSyl** » Wed Jul 05, 2017 8:24 pm

I would argue that there was no draft because this was, both metaphorically and literally, a garbage proposal. It doubt it was ever aiming for anything but being on the 'Proposals' page for 3 days as a joke, but it made quorum.

If you're going to take this too seriously, then blame the delegates that approved it to the point of it reaching a vote.

by **Trelisa** » Wed Jul 05, 2017 8:49 pm

Why is this even here fam? I mean fr. This is more an RP related issue, not a international issue.

by **Liberated Free Nations** » Wed Jul 05, 2017 11:51 pm

Why... are RAIDERS the only ones who ever get condemned?

It would be a lot more fair to condemn nations for RP or even NS stat reasons than for it to be a rare and exclusive reward for raiderism, like only regions like the Black Hawks can ever get. How many of you voters, yourselves, ever get to be Commended or Condemned?

by **Bhang Bhang Duc** » Thu Jul 06, 2017 2:09 am

Liberated Free Nations wrote:Why... are RAIDERS the only ones who ever get condemned?

It would be a lot more fair to condemn nations for RP or even NS stat reasons than for it to be a rare and exclusive reward for raiderism, like only regions like the Black Hawks can ever get. How many of you voters, yourselves, ever get to be Commended or Condemned?

They're not. A quick look at this thread

viewtopic.php?f=24&t=392800

will show that nations and regions have been C&C for a number of reasons, not just for raiding.

by **Free Flubliic Hartopia** » Thu Jul 06, 2017 10:27 am

Definitely voting no for this one, just too funny to even take it seriously and vote yes.

by **Altinarmy 18** » Thu Jul 06, 2017 7:43 pm

Such trash. It's a shame.

[DEFEATED] Condemn Wrektopia

LOL

Who is online