Cresenthia wrote:The only things TGW are defending against are the negative consequences of their own actions.
I mean. Really?
(risking being dinged for image spam/flaming/baiting/whatever) You might want to change your avatar to this:
Advertisement
by Roavin » Mon May 15, 2017 8:56 pm
Cresenthia wrote:The only things TGW are defending against are the negative consequences of their own actions.
by Tim-Opolis » Mon May 15, 2017 10:15 pm
Cresenthia wrote:The only things TGW are defending against are the negative consequences of their own actions.
<Koth - 06/30/2020> I mean as far as GPers go, Tim is one of the most iconic
by Singpu » Mon May 15, 2017 10:58 pm
Singpu wrote...
:o
Translation: utceforp, can ezungal go ahead and goto Farla? Also, sorry if my typing and reading is off noticeably, my eye doctor dialated my eyes, so...
by Cormactopia Prime » Mon May 15, 2017 11:00 pm
by Wallenburg » Mon May 15, 2017 11:05 pm
Cormactopia Prime wrote:That this has gotten to vote at all really doesn't speak well of the process for World Assembly resolutions achieving quorum.
Against, in case that wasn't already clear.
by Tim-Opolis » Mon May 15, 2017 11:18 pm
Ridersyl wrote:They've done nothing Condemn-worthy. The author of this one only wrote it out of spite, too.
Against.
<Koth - 06/30/2020> I mean as far as GPers go, Tim is one of the most iconic
by Drasnia » Mon May 15, 2017 11:25 pm
Tim-Opolis wrote:Ridersyl wrote:They've done nothing Condemn-worthy. The author of this one only wrote it out of spite, too.
Against.
"Concerned that the unsporstmanlike tactics of The Grey Wardens are unbecoming of a member region of the Security Council
Identifying the fact that The Grey Wardens are counteractive to the foreign policy objectives of an Independent Security Council"
I gotchu fam.
by Thermodolia » Tue May 16, 2017 1:34 am
Ridersyl wrote:They've done nothing Condemn-worthy. The author of this one only wrote it out of spite, too.
Against.
by RiderSyl » Tue May 16, 2017 2:24 am
Thermodolia wrote:Ridersyl wrote:They've done nothing Condemn-worthy. The author of this one only wrote it out of spite, too.
Against.
It's pretty evident especially when you look at this:
"The numerous unprovoked actions against Kaiserreich, in particular, the puppeteering of Kurnugia."
The author is a high ranking member of Kaiserreich. Nope no spite there
by Kurnugia » Tue May 16, 2017 2:48 am
I mean... there is even a more blantant quote:Ridersyl wrote:Thermodolia wrote:It's pretty evident especially when you look at this:
"The numerous unprovoked actions against Kaiserreich, in particular, the puppeteering of Kurnugia."
The author is a high ranking member of Kaiserreich. Nope no spite there
Oh wow. That's so blatant.
"They did stuff against the region that I'm a member of! Condemn them!"
Can we fail this early and move on to something else?
Cresenthia wrote:I really don't care about that 96.5% number or whatever it actually is. Even if they just dropped in on a Warzone I wouldn't care too much. But TGW is making a pattern out of complaining about regions in the forums for BS reasons (or none at all), and then using that as a pretext to trash them. That is wrong. That, and they keep using Kurnugia to trash talk Kaiserreich, even though he never claimed anything about Nazism until they poached him from his rebellion (which had nothing to do with ideology).
by Nativista » Tue May 16, 2017 4:29 am
by GCMR of Cokeland » Tue May 16, 2017 6:33 am
by Willania Imperium » Tue May 16, 2017 7:37 am
BerCasca wrote:I understand the reason for this, but before voting I would like to know what the reason is that many members are against the proposal?
by Xovland » Tue May 16, 2017 8:00 am
by Cerian Quilor » Tue May 16, 2017 8:06 am
Willania Imperium wrote:
No, no. You misunderstand me. I said that their "supposed" raids were really defending the region through non-traditional ways. I didn't say raiding as a whole is "non-traditional defending."
by Benevolent Thomas » Tue May 16, 2017 9:01 am
BerCasca wrote:I understand the reason for this, but before voting I would like to know what the reason is that many members are against the proposal?
Ballotonia wrote:Personally, I think there's something seriously wrong with a game if it willfully allows the destruction of longtime player communities in favor of kids whose sole purpose is to enjoy ruining the game for others.
by Thermodolia » Tue May 16, 2017 9:26 am
BerCasca wrote:I understand the reason for this, but before voting I would like to know what the reason is that many members are against the proposal?
by Thermodolia » Tue May 16, 2017 9:28 am
Xovland wrote:You are going after the wrong target. The Red Fleet has a far more egregious history of invading innocent regions under guise of moral justice. Just because we used to have an embassy with Kaiserreich, they invaded our region without any warning.
I still don't understand what the big fuss about Kaiserreich is about. They are based on the German Empire, not the Nazis. Even if they were based on Nazis, that isn't an endorsement of their policies. I have roleplayed in the past using ideologies I disagreed with, that doesn't mean I was endorsing those ideologies.
by Bhang Bhang Duc » Tue May 16, 2017 10:15 am
Ridersyl wrote:Thermodolia wrote:It's pretty evident especially when you look at this:
"The numerous unprovoked actions against Kaiserreich, in particular, the puppeteering of Kurnugia."
The author is a high ranking member of Kaiserreich. Nope no spite there
Oh wow. That's so blatant.
"They did stuff against the region that I'm a member of! Condemn them!"
Can we fail this early and move on to something else?
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.
RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.
Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..
by Small Huts » Tue May 16, 2017 10:37 am
by Benevolent Thomas » Tue May 16, 2017 11:07 am
Ballotonia wrote:Personally, I think there's something seriously wrong with a game if it willfully allows the destruction of longtime player communities in favor of kids whose sole purpose is to enjoy ruining the game for others.
by Roavin » Tue May 16, 2017 11:26 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement