Advertisement
by United Areas of Conservatives » Tue Jul 25, 2017 7:21 am
by States of Glory WA Office » Tue Jul 25, 2017 7:24 am
United Areas of Conservatives wrote:"Nonsense. We torture our traitors and murderers and we're proud of it!"
by Regele Baular » Tue Jul 25, 2017 7:31 am
Railb wrote:The wording of the proposal, as aforementioned, would be go to far into the military actions of WA nations.
This would also effect my nation's commitment to policing failed states and to defend the Railbite way of life. Therefore, we will change our vote and join Regel Baular and many others in opposing this motion.
by United Areas of Conservatives » Tue Jul 25, 2017 9:22 am
States of Glory WA Office wrote:United Areas of Conservatives wrote:"Nonsense. We torture our traitors and murderers and we're proud of it!"
Fairburn: In that case, your nation is in violation of GA #9 a.k.a. Prevention of Torture. Because of your Delegation's pride in violating WA resolutions, any and all diplomatic relations between States of Glory and the United Areas of Conservatives are hereby terminated.
by Europe and Oceania » Tue Jul 25, 2017 10:38 am
by Excidium Planetis » Tue Jul 25, 2017 11:56 am
Singaporean Transhumans wrote:You didn't know about Excidium? The greatest space nomads in the NS multiverse with a healthy dose (read: over 9000 percent) of realism?
Saveyou Island wrote:"Warmest welcomes to the Assembly, ambassador. You'll soon learn to hate everyone here."
Imperium Anglorum wrote:Digital Network Defence is pretty meh
News: AI wins Dawn Fleet election for High Counselor.
by Projection Island » Tue Jul 25, 2017 12:43 pm
States of Glory WA Office wrote:United Areas of Conservatives wrote:"Nonsense. We torture our traitors and murderers and we're proud of it!"
Fairburn: In that case, your nation is in violation of GA #9 a.k.a. Prevention of Torture. Because of your Delegation's pride in violating WA resolutions, any and all diplomatic relations between States of Glory and the United Areas of Conservatives are hereby terminated.
by The Egyptian Pharocracial Suzerainty » Tue Jul 25, 2017 2:01 pm
by Wallenburg » Tue Jul 25, 2017 2:28 pm
Projection Island wrote:States of Glory WA Office wrote:Fairburn: In that case, your nation is in violation of GA #9 a.k.a. Prevention of Torture. Because of your Delegation's pride in violating WA resolutions, any and all diplomatic relations between States of Glory and the United Areas of Conservatives are hereby terminated.
"To be excessively fair, extrajudicial torture is not covered by that resolution unless either a government official gives approval for it, expresses approval of it, or assists with it. It is possible that their ex-ambassador was the first government official to have filled any of those criteria."
"This does bring up a good point about precisely why a proposal like this could be necessary, although the Batman argument is still effective as a counter."
by Projection Island » Tue Jul 25, 2017 4:28 pm
Wallenburg wrote:Projection Island wrote:"To be excessively fair, extrajudicial torture is not covered by that resolution unless either a government official gives approval for it, expresses approval of it, or assists with it. It is possible that their ex-ambassador was the first government official to have filled any of those criteria."
"This does bring up a good point about precisely why a proposal like this could be necessary, although the Batman argument is still effective as a counter."
"Extrajudicial torture goes by several legal names. Prominently, assault, battery, and kidnapping."
by Check-o-slow-vakki-uh » Tue Jul 25, 2017 6:19 pm
by Luziland » Tue Jul 25, 2017 6:42 pm
by Wallenburg » Tue Jul 25, 2017 7:46 pm
Projection Island wrote:Wallenburg wrote:"Extrajudicial torture goes by several legal names. Prominently, assault, battery, and kidnapping."
"None of which are necessarily illegal in their nation, Ambassador. Unless I have missed a resolution stating otherwise; I admit to not having scanned all of them yet. I was merely considering their compliance, not their sanity."
by Imperium Anglorum » Tue Jul 25, 2017 7:49 pm
Wallenburg wrote:"I believe that, if a member state has a stable enough government to obtain membership in the first place, they must already have basic violent crime laws."
by Projection Island » Tue Jul 25, 2017 8:14 pm
Wallenburg wrote:Projection Island wrote:"None of which are necessarily illegal in their nation, Ambassador. Unless I have missed a resolution stating otherwise; I admit to not having scanned all of them yet. I was merely considering their compliance, not their sanity."
"I believe that, if a member state has a stable enough government to obtain membership in the first place, they must already have basic violent crime laws."
Imperium Anglorum wrote:Wallenburg wrote:"I believe that, if a member state has a stable enough government to obtain membership in the first place, they must already have basic violent crime laws."
OOC: And if they don't... well, they must have a pretty good reason not to have such a basic requirement of practically ever legal system. xD
by Bananaistan » Wed Jul 26, 2017 12:12 am
States of Glory WA Office wrote:Neville: Our Delegation will not allow you to ban Batman. Opposed.
by Lexicor » Wed Jul 26, 2017 12:49 am
by The Puddle Jumping Wads of Wrapper » Wed Jul 26, 2017 2:53 am
by The Ninja5 Empire » Wed Jul 26, 2017 2:57 am
by Bears Armed » Wed Jul 26, 2017 3:38 am
The Egyptian Pharocracial Suzerainty wrote:We have determined to vote against this Proposal upon the advice of Ambassador Rorschach.
"Never compromise, never relent, not even in the face of World Assembly disapproval."
by God1 » Wed Jul 26, 2017 5:06 am
by Wallenburg » Wed Jul 26, 2017 5:09 am
God1 wrote:I'm against the Extrajudicial Punishment Ban because the fact that there are a lot of people who are getting kidnapped, abused and murdered. There are too many crimes going on out there and we need to bring things to justice. Criminals should have this punishment but it should determined whether they get it or not based off of what they did.
by The Puddle Jumping Wads of Wrapper » Wed Jul 26, 2017 5:10 am
God1 wrote:I'm against the Extrajudicial Punishment Ban because the fact that there are a lot of people who are getting kidnapped, abused and murdered. There are too many crimes going on out there and we need to bring things to justice. Criminals should have this punishment but it should determined whether they get it or not based off of what they did.
by Minovdigon » Wed Jul 26, 2017 7:00 am
by The Puddle Jumping Wads of Wrapper » Wed Jul 26, 2017 7:06 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement