Advertisement
by The Rich Port » Wed Mar 24, 2010 1:56 pm
Yammata wrote:I see nothing wrong with slave trade its fine why do we condemn it?
by Isaris » Wed Mar 24, 2010 3:36 pm
by The Eternal Kawaii » Wed Mar 24, 2010 7:18 pm
by Unibotian WASC Mission » Wed Mar 24, 2010 7:56 pm
The Eternal Kawaii wrote:In the Name of the Eternal Kawaii, may the Cute One be praised
Slavery? Bad. We vote "yes" on this condemnation.
by The Rich Port » Wed Mar 24, 2010 8:42 pm
Isaris wrote:If a requirement of that region is to not be a WA member, then Greater Tezdrian is not a WA member. Therefore, the WA has NO authority over Greater Tezdrian and in my opinion, its condemnation is a violation of its own laws.
by South Norwega » Wed Mar 24, 2010 11:31 pm
Isaris wrote:If a requirement of that region is to not be a WA member, then Greater Tezdrian is not a WA member. Therefore, the WA has NO authority over Greater Tezdrian and in my opinion, its condemnation is a violation of its own laws.
by Metania » Thu Mar 25, 2010 1:16 am
by WokaStates » Thu Mar 25, 2010 1:46 am
Yammata wrote:I see nothing wrong with slave trade its fine why do we condemn it?
by The Rich Port » Thu Mar 25, 2010 1:17 pm
WokaStates wrote:Yammata wrote:I see nothing wrong with slave trade its fine why do we condemn it?
If there's nothing wrong, why don't you become a slave by yourself? Slavery is one of the worst things nations can do to people. People are not objects or animals and therefore we should not treat them like they are.
by Diatraba » Thu Mar 25, 2010 1:31 pm
by The Rich Port » Thu Mar 25, 2010 1:35 pm
Diatraba wrote:ahem. If I could briefly interrupt the arguments over the legality of this condemnation? I would like to assume the role of teller and provide the Assembly with an updated vote count:
For: 2,779. Against: 682.
This means that this Condemnation is very likely to pass unless a very powerful delegate votes against this - we must ensure that that does not happen.
Thank you
Si je pouvais interrompre brièvement les arguments sur la légalité de cette condamnation? Je tiens à assumer le rôle de conteur et fournir à l'Assemblée avec un décompte de vote mis à jour:
Pour: 2779. Contre: 682.
Cela signifie que cette condamnation est très probable de passer à moins qu'un délégué voix très puissante contre cela - nous devons nous assurer que cela n'arrive pas.
Merci
by Agaralia » Thu Mar 25, 2010 1:46 pm
Isaris wrote:If a requirement of that region is to not be a WA member, then Greater Tezdrian is not a WA member. Therefore, the WA has NO authority over Greater Tezdrian and in my opinion, its condemnation is a violation of its own laws.
Tom Bishop wrote:There's no point as we are already being oppressed.
by Diatraba » Fri Mar 26, 2010 12:45 am
The Rich Port wrote:Diatraba wrote:ahem. If I could briefly interrupt the arguments over the legality of this condemnation? I would like to assume the role of teller and provide the Assembly with an updated vote count:
For: 2,779. Against: 682.
This means that this Condemnation is very likely to pass unless a very powerful delegate votes against this - we must ensure that that does not happen.
Thank you
Si je pouvais interrompre brièvement les arguments sur la légalité de cette condamnation? Je tiens à assumer le rôle de conteur et fournir à l'Assemblée avec un décompte de vote mis à jour:
Pour: 2779. Contre: 682.
Cela signifie que cette condamnation est très probable de passer à moins qu'un délégué voix très puissante contre cela - nous devons nous assurer que cela n'arrive pas.
Merci
In case your mind has not grasped the concept, Dib, condemnations against slaver nations are BAD for slavery.
by The Rich Port » Fri Mar 26, 2010 4:29 am
Diatraba wrote:The Rich Port wrote:Diatraba wrote:ahem. If I could briefly interrupt the arguments over the legality of this condemnation? I would like to assume the role of teller and provide the Assembly with an updated vote count:
For: 2,779. Against: 682.
This means that this Condemnation is very likely to pass unless a very powerful delegate votes against this - we must ensure that that does not happen.
Thank you
Si je pouvais interrompre brièvement les arguments sur la légalité de cette condamnation? Je tiens à assumer le rôle de conteur et fournir à l'Assemblée avec un décompte de vote mis à jour:
Pour: 2779. Contre: 682.
Cela signifie que cette condamnation est très probable de passer à moins qu'un délégué voix très puissante contre cela - nous devons nous assurer que cela n'arrive pas.
Merci
In case your mind has not grasped the concept, Dib, condemnations against slaver nations are BAD for slavery.
Look at the post where I gave the reasons behind voting for this Resolution you imbecile!
Rechercher dans le poste où j'ai donné les raisons de voter pour cette résolution, imbécile!
by Diatraba » Fri Mar 26, 2010 9:10 am
by Tzorsland » Fri Mar 26, 2010 11:41 am
The Rich Port wrote:In case your mind has not grasped the concept, Dib, condemnations against slaver nations are BAD for slavery.
by The Rich Port » Fri Mar 26, 2010 1:23 pm
by The Rational-Minded » Fri Mar 26, 2010 3:50 pm
by Agaralia » Fri Mar 26, 2010 4:08 pm
Diatraba wrote:ahem. If I could briefly interrupt the arguments over the legality of this condemnation? I would like to assume the role of teller and provide the Assembly with an updated vote count:
For: 2,779. Against: 682.
This means that this Condemnation is very likely to pass unless a very powerful delegate votes against this - we must ensure that that does not happen.
Thank you
Si je pouvais interrompre brièvement les arguments sur la légalité de cette condamnation? Je tiens à assumer le rôle de conteur et fournir à l'Assemblée avec un décompte de vote mis à jour:
Pour: 2779. Contre: 682.
Cela signifie que cette condamnation est très probable de passer à moins qu'un délégué voix très puissante contre cela - nous devons nous assurer que cela n'arrive pas.
Merci
Tom Bishop wrote:There's no point as we are already being oppressed.
by Greater Americania » Fri Mar 26, 2010 4:12 pm
by Tkdkidsx2 » Fri Mar 26, 2010 4:15 pm
Riaka wrote:Son, you've just entered the exciting and frightening world of religious debate. It's much like a roller coaster, in the sense that in the next few minutes there are going to many twists and turns, potential vertical inversion, a lot of crying children and someone's probably going to throw up at the end.
by Tkdkidsx2 » Fri Mar 26, 2010 4:16 pm
Greater Americania wrote:I just think it's interesting that the WA is officially connecting itself to the RPing community through this proposal. I like that development.
Riaka wrote:Son, you've just entered the exciting and frightening world of religious debate. It's much like a roller coaster, in the sense that in the next few minutes there are going to many twists and turns, potential vertical inversion, a lot of crying children and someone's probably going to throw up at the end.
by Darkesia » Fri Mar 26, 2010 7:20 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement