Sedgistan wrote:Just wondering - why is the word "assitance" in the penultimate clause italicised? Also, it should be "assistance", but that observation comes a bit too late
Entirely intentional. Not joking.
Advertisement
by Unibot » Fri Nov 26, 2010 1:25 pm
Sedgistan wrote:Just wondering - why is the word "assitance" in the penultimate clause italicised? Also, it should be "assistance", but that observation comes a bit too late
Vocenae wrote:Unibot, you have won NS.
by A mean old man » Fri Nov 26, 2010 1:25 pm
by Bergnovinaia » Fri Nov 26, 2010 4:29 pm
by Unibot » Fri Nov 26, 2010 5:23 pm
Bergnovinaia wrote:I know it's bad form to post in my own commednation thread, but I think is hyserical you put "assistance" in italics. Dislexia ftw!
Vocenae wrote:Unibot, you have won NS.
by Unibot » Fri Dec 03, 2010 5:04 pm
Vocenae wrote:Unibot, you have won NS.
by A mean old man » Fri Dec 03, 2010 5:28 pm
by Flemingovia » Sat Dec 04, 2010 3:30 pm
by Unibot » Sat Dec 04, 2010 11:09 pm
Flemingovia wrote:*although it would be improved by the introduction of a few Nazis.
Vocenae wrote:Unibot, you have won NS.
by Frattastan » Sun Dec 05, 2010 4:08 am
Drop Your Pants wrote:I think raiders are cute, the way they think they're big and scary people who threaten others :)
by Noders » Sun Dec 05, 2010 8:05 am
Socialdemokraterne wrote:Noders: Only the finest books and pizza. And books about pizza. Not so much their book-flavored pizzas, though.
by Unibot » Sun Dec 05, 2010 6:25 pm
Vocenae wrote:Unibot, you have won NS.
by A mean old man » Sun Dec 05, 2010 6:35 pm
by Unibot » Sun Dec 05, 2010 9:41 pm
Vocenae wrote:Unibot, you have won NS.
by James McCosh » Mon Dec 06, 2010 7:03 am
by Unibot » Mon Dec 06, 2010 9:07 am
James McCosh wrote:"Commend" a country that gives subsidies to internatioanal lawyers and supports international courts?
If the word was "condemn" not "commend" the resolution would make sense. As written the resolution does not make sense.
Vocenae wrote:Unibot, you have won NS.
by Isaris » Mon Dec 06, 2010 4:43 pm
Bergnovinaia wrote:From the Desk of Prime Minister Roberts
Head Chair of NAA
Although we try to prevent nuclear attakcs from occuring, we cannot stop every single one, nor can we condemn every single nation that uses nuclear attacks, especially after they are done using them.
Yours,
Prime Minister Kennan Roberts of Bergnovinaia
Head Chair of NAA
by Bergnovinaia » Mon Dec 06, 2010 5:30 pm
Isaris wrote:Bergnovinaia wrote:From the Desk of Prime Minister Roberts
Head Chair of NAA
Although we try to prevent nuclear attakcs from occuring, we cannot stop every single one, nor can we condemn every single nation that uses nuclear attacks, especially after they are done using them.
Yours,
Prime Minister Kennan Roberts of Bergnovinaia
Head Chair of NAA
Wouldn't it make more sense to condemn a nation/region for something that they've done, rather than something they are going to do? In order to qualify for condemnation, you have to have done something bad. Although I suppose one could be condemned for something they are in the process of doing... but not for something they are thinking about doing. That's just the same as condemning for an ideology, which is illogical.
by A mean old man » Mon Dec 06, 2010 8:21 pm
by Bergnovinaia » Mon Dec 06, 2010 9:24 pm
A mean old man wrote:It looks like a complaint against the workings of the NAA, the body your nation founded which is referenced in the text of the commendation.
by Delaclava » Wed Dec 08, 2010 11:28 am
UNDERSTANDING that Bergnovinaia authored GA#65, “Biological Weapons Conference”, which authorized a widespread member nation disarmament of biological weapons to aid in efforts for international peace;
NOTING the sheer number of human casualties that were prevented with the adoption of the aforementioned resolution which is all due to the commitment and determination of the Bergnovinaian delegation;
CELEBRATING their creation and continued funding of the International Bureau of Lawyers (IBL), which united attorneys from twenty-two different countries with a range of specialities including criminal and international as well as corporate and transnational corporate law to represent those -- in domestic and international courts such as the International Criminal Court (ICC) -- who otherwise did not have a decent legal representation at their defense;
FURTHER CELEBRATING the nominee’s creation and leadership of the Nuclear Arms Assembly (NAA), a --now dissolved-- body of member nations committed to:
• The non-proliferation of nuclear weapons;
• Humanitarian support (particularly for radiological and nuclear disasters);
• A reduction of nuclear warfare;
• Peaceful mediation and peacekeeping;
• Replacing outdated nuclear technology;
• The education of nuclear technicians;
ACKNOWLEDGING that the NAA, in its prime contained sixty-two powerful member nations, and was a guiding peacekeeping and humanitarian force in international incidents including:
• The evacuation, and recovery of the Southern Province of Pan-freeland after civil turmoil in the fledgling nation had caused a nuclear war;
• Mediation in a successful peace conference between the following WA member nations... Jlop, Juthra, Kriania and Almaniania, that resulted in a total nuclear disarmament between the involved parties and a peaceful resolution;
• The successful resistance of an Orlkjestadi invasion of Slaytesics, a WA member nation;
• An engagement of heavy economic sanctions and war against Southern United Africa, for their barbaric history of chemical warfare;
• The diplomatic arbitration in a conflict between Chezovolvia and Sunkistodia, while aiding in the containment of the disease which instigated the conflict;
• Support for Seculartopia, by constructing temporary barriers around the southern end of the Sagan River Bank -- thus protecting citizens from radiological contamination and flooding;
BELIEVING that while the NAA may have recently dissolved because of inactivity -- the spirit and the contributions of an international actor like the NAA or a state-actor like Bergnovinaia, deserve to be immortalized for future generations to find inspiration from;
With consideration to the renowned contributions of the NAA and Bergnovinaia to world peace and wellbeing in addition to their assitance of those in need,
HEREBY COMMENDS Bergnovinaia.
by Unibot » Wed Dec 08, 2010 3:22 pm
Delaclava wrote:UNDERSTANDING that Bergnovinaia authored GA#65, “Biological Weapons Conference”, which authorized a widespread member nation disarmament of biological weapons to aid in efforts for international peace;
NOTING the sheer number of human casualties that were prevented with the adoption of the aforementioned resolution which is all due to the commitment and determination of the Bergnovinaian delegation;
I doubt how much this has actually done for the world as a whole. WA nations (namely The Final Rome) used biological weapons, and no casualties were prevented. I expect that there is a similar pattern throughout the rest of the world.
Vocenae wrote:Unibot, you have won NS.
by Bergnovinaia » Wed Dec 08, 2010 3:44 pm
Condemnations are earned by helping a great portion of the world and accomplishing truly fantastic things. The number of nations this has affected is enough only to fill a couple of large regions. What past commended nations have done have accomplished things that have affected much of the world.
by Delaclava » Wed Dec 08, 2010 7:29 pm
Unibot wrote:
Non-compliance is illegal.
Bergnovinaia wrote:Condemnations are earned by helping a great portion of the world and accomplishing truly fantastic things. The number of nations this has affected is enough only to fill a couple of large regions. What past commended nations have done have accomplished things that have affected much of the world.
Last time I checked, those are for doing harm to the world...
Edit: How does the eradication of biological and chemical weapons held by WA member states not better the world as a whole...?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement