Advertisement
by Musicolo » Tue Jul 21, 2009 12:24 pm
by Stragonubius » Tue Jul 21, 2009 12:46 pm
Musicolo wrote:You guys are making it sound like the WA is forcing people to be euthanized.
~ MalikovDoes anyone else think that this is a little odd. I suggest that the people who have posted here, and are new to the WA vote with their regions WA Delegate. They know better then you.
by Goobergunchia » Tue Jul 21, 2009 2:26 pm
by Velite » Tue Jul 21, 2009 2:40 pm
by Jdskinny » Tue Jul 21, 2009 2:45 pm
by President mccarthy » Tue Jul 21, 2009 3:10 pm
by President mccarthy » Tue Jul 21, 2009 3:11 pm
by Stragonubius » Tue Jul 21, 2009 3:35 pm
~ MalikovDoes anyone else think that this is a little odd. I suggest that the people who have posted here, and are new to the WA vote with their regions WA Delegate. They know better then you.
by Inchwellion » Tue Jul 21, 2009 4:20 pm
by Aundotutunagir » Tue Jul 21, 2009 4:31 pm
by Stragonubius » Tue Jul 21, 2009 4:39 pm
Inchwellion wrote:I don't believe that it should just be allowed for terminally ill people but also people who are in extreme agony with no hope of it ending for years to come until they die naturally. What about these people?
~ MalikovDoes anyone else think that this is a little odd. I suggest that the people who have posted here, and are new to the WA vote with their regions WA Delegate. They know better then you.
by Stragonubius » Tue Jul 21, 2009 4:46 pm
Aundotutunagir wrote:We oppose any efforts by the WA to interfere with our Basic National Policy of Birth Rate Maximization.
~ MalikovDoes anyone else think that this is a little odd. I suggest that the people who have posted here, and are new to the WA vote with their regions WA Delegate. They know better then you.
by Aundotutunagir » Tue Jul 21, 2009 4:55 pm
Stragonubius wrote:Aundotutunagir wrote:We oppose any efforts by the WA to interfere with our Basic National Policy of Birth Rate Maximization.
Easily Fixed!
The Patient Must on 2 separate occasions request the Pill.
After the first request simply attach the patient to a respirator making a second such attempt Impossible.
by Stragonubius » Tue Jul 21, 2009 4:59 pm
Aundotutunagir wrote:I like the cut of your jib, Ambassador.
~ MalikovDoes anyone else think that this is a little odd. I suggest that the people who have posted here, and are new to the WA vote with their regions WA Delegate. They know better then you.
by Malikov » Tue Jul 21, 2009 5:30 pm
Stragonubius wrote:Aundotutunagir wrote:We oppose any efforts by the WA to interfere with our Basic National Policy of Birth Rate Maximization.
Easily Fixed!
The Patient Must on 2 separate occasions request the Pill.
After the first request simply attach the patient to a respirator making a second such attempt Impossible.
"Friendship is two pals munching on a well cooked face together."Tiurabo wrote:Your forces are weak because you are capable of reigning them in.
by Stragonubius » Tue Jul 21, 2009 5:42 pm
It's easy to administer a killing drug with a needle, and it's possible to remove the respirator in about 1 second. Oh Boy!!! A loophole within a loophole!!!!!
~ MalikovDoes anyone else think that this is a little odd. I suggest that the people who have posted here, and are new to the WA vote with their regions WA Delegate. They know better then you.
by Qumkent » Tue Jul 21, 2009 6:55 pm
Aundotutunagir wrote:The People of Aundotutunagir oppose this! We have accordingly instructed our WA surrogates to vote AGAINST!
Why you may ask? We have perfected procedures which allow females to continue with child-bearing well into their '80s and '90s. One patriotic citizen even gave birth recently at the ripe old age of 103 while being kept alive by a respirator and a feeding tube. Furthermore, during the past year literally thousands of pregnancies have been carried to term by people suffering from painful and debilitating diseases, burn victims, and quadruple amputees. Had this resolution been in place (and had Aundotutunagir been a WA member), many of those births would not have occurred since the mothers might have chosen to take their own lives. We oppose any efforts by the WA to interfere with our Basic National Policy of Birth Rate Maximization.
by Zifnab » Tue Jul 21, 2009 8:01 pm
by Sunlumo » Tue Jul 21, 2009 11:51 pm
by Bisgea » Wed Jul 22, 2009 5:56 am
Sunlumo wrote:As the people of Sunlumo can forsee no dire consequences resulting from this motion due to its careful provisions, we have no problem voting FOR to force this upon the International Community.
-The Soviet Socialist Republic of Sunlumo
by Iron Kris » Wed Jul 22, 2009 6:03 am
by Sci-fleet » Wed Jul 22, 2009 8:24 am
by Malikov » Wed Jul 22, 2009 9:20 am
Stragonubius wrote:It's easy to administer a killing drug with a needle, and it's possible to remove the respirator in about 1 second. Oh Boy!!! A loophole within a loophole!!!!!
The patient must also make a written request which cannot be done without hands, access to a pen and paper, Proof that the patient has not become incapable of making decisions based on pain tolerance, and 2 Viable witnesses that cannot be related to the patient (both of whom would have to gain admittance to a hospital under the goverments control).
2 separate physicians must agree on the diagnosis, whom I assume are on the goverments payroll?
and the patient must also be informed on 4 different occasions about the drug that is to be used...
All in all if you Cannot Stop the request, there is room for Decades of delay, red tape and general mischief.
Thanks for trying
"Friendship is two pals munching on a well cooked face together."Tiurabo wrote:Your forces are weak because you are capable of reigning them in.
by Unibot » Wed Jul 22, 2009 9:46 am
Vocenae wrote:Unibot, you have won NS.
by Leelan » Wed Jul 22, 2009 9:54 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: West Andes
Advertisement