NationStates

I've put up a new draft if folks can check it out. I've removed any mentions to Nazi Europa and have also mildly toned down the language towards La Navasse.

Barring any issues, Take #2 is penciled in for mid-week or so.

"Hugely Amused" is gone. Against.

Consular wrote:"Hugely Amused" is gone. Against.

What? But that was my bon mot.

Never mind, whatever it needs to get the original off books I'll support.

Again, we'll support it.

After not being apart of the WA at the original time of this Proposal's authorship date, and further looking into the situation, you have Capercom's full support for this Proposal.

Full support, and you still have permission to use any part of my own draft with credit if you so wish.

Full support. Looks ready for submission to me.

At this point we may as well. Support.

It's a damn shame you had to change the text of the proposal, but anything to get Dank Memes off the books. I'm still in favor.

Full support from me. Good luck!

Tim, you do realize that your new version needs to be in a separate thread, right?

Wallenburg wrote:Tim, you do realize that your new version needs to be in a separate thread, right?

This isn't the thread attached to the proposal upon which voting occurred.

Imperium Anglorum wrote:

Wallenburg wrote:Tim, you do realize that your new version needs to be in a separate thread, right?

This isn't the thread attached to the proposal upon which voting occurred.

Yes, it is. I made my "I'm voting for this resolution" post on the first page. Also:

Abhichandra wrote:

"Repeal "Liberate Dank memes"" was defeated 9,265 votes to 5,098.

So it is. A new thread should be created, yes.

Awh, y'all General Assembly regulars getting all hung up on technicalities. It's cute.

Full support.

I mean, is there a rule that it needs a new thread?

Consular wrote:I mean, is there a rule that it needs a new thread?

Not that I'm aware of. Same subject matter, same author, don't see a problem.

Wallenburg wrote:Tim, you do realize that your new version needs to be in a separate thread, right?

Never seen anything in the SC that dictates I must. Get your GA principles out of our chaotic mess!

I had to remove the "amused" bit to better ensure a TNP Aye vote. This is what happens when the other GCRs don't stack early enough to counter it gaining all the lemmings

I was holding off with this until I saw how the current Page 1 Repeal fared, but given that it never made quorum and the author seems to have forgotten about it, I'll be pushing this through.

I anticipate submitting either Saturday or Sunday, and believe that I've tweaked it sufficiently that it deals with the concerns of giving too much recognition to Nazis and the concern that I was being too disparaging towards La Navasse.

Support

Fully and absolutely support.

My presence will ultimately be over with the passing of this Repeal.

Tim-Opolis wrote:I was holding off with this until I saw how the current Page 1 Repeal fared, but given that it never made quorum and the author seems to have forgotten about it, I'll be pushing this through.

Forgotten, no, more like unable to connect due to things out of my control.

Oresland wrote:

Tim-Opolis wrote:I was holding off with this until I saw how the current Page 1 Repeal fared, but given that it never made quorum and the author seems to have forgotten about it, I'll be pushing this through.

Forgotten, no, more like unable to connect due to things out of my control.

That would do it too. My condolences for whatever your situation may have been.

Tim-Opolis wrote:

Oresland wrote:
Forgotten, no, more like unable to connect due to things out of my control.

That would do it too. My condolences for whatever your situation may have been.

Thanks, just wanted to clarify that it was just that, not that I have forgotten. I'll be endorsing your proposal and hoping that it passes.

For.