Advertisement
by Consular » Wed Mar 01, 2017 5:44 pm
Crito wrote:The World Assembly shouldn't have to jump in to every little inter-Nicene squabble. I see no clear evidence that any invaders are actually doing anything. There is the mere echo and threat that someone may do something. That isn't a cause for action. We shouldn't be fighting a war that Southern Pacific boy ought to be fighting themselves!
by Rusozak » Wed Mar 01, 2017 8:50 pm
by Wallenburg » Wed Mar 01, 2017 8:51 pm
Rusozak wrote:Wait, again? I swear SP is invaded more than any other game-created region.
by Mount Seymour » Wed Mar 01, 2017 9:35 pm
Wallenburg wrote:Why does this resolution attempt to mislead voters that The South Pacific is being raided, rather than South Pacific?
The Pacific Alpine Commonwealth of Mount Seymour
a.k.a. Somyrion, Aumeltopia
by Wallenburg » Wed Mar 01, 2017 9:39 pm
KNOWING that two large raider organizations are in the process of destroying South Pacific, one of the earliest regions in the world,
NOTING that South Pacific is a region of great historical importance, having been founded fourteen years ago,
by Tinhampton » Thu Mar 02, 2017 1:19 am
Wallenburg wrote:Mount Seymour wrote:I don't see where it attempts to mislead voters. The only references to the region are to South Pacific, no "the" attached.KNOWING that two large raider organizations are in the process of destroying South Pacific, one of the earliest regions in the world,
NOTING that South Pacific is a region of great historical importance, having been founded fourteen years ago,
by Wallenburg » Thu Mar 02, 2017 2:02 am
by Drasnia » Thu Mar 02, 2017 2:13 am
Wallenburg wrote:Tinhampton wrote:South Pacific is founderless (proper founderless, not just our-founder-ceased-to-exist founderless). The last founderless regions by design were created in May 2003-ish. So yes, the resolution is correct (so to speak).
Curious. So it just happens to be a really old region sharing a name with another really old region. OK.
by Wallenburg » Thu Mar 02, 2017 2:16 am
Drasnia wrote:Wallenburg wrote:Curious. So it just happens to be a really old region sharing a name with another really old region. OK.
I'm pretty sure it was created in order to ape off of the Pacific, long before any of the other feeders were created. It just so happened that eventually, the admins created TSP and thus a region that shared a name.
by Consular » Thu Mar 02, 2017 6:19 pm
by Karafuto-cho » Thu Mar 02, 2017 6:26 pm
Consular wrote:Why is this tagged as passed now? I mean, it's certainly going to pass, but the vote isn't over yet...
by The Atlae Isles » Fri Mar 03, 2017 8:44 pm
Rusozak wrote:Wait, again? I swear SP is invaded more than any other game-created region.
by East Tight Gerbamopiance » Sat Mar 04, 2017 9:56 am
by Yatzatz » Sat Mar 04, 2017 11:49 am
Wallenburg wrote:South Pacific isn't game created. The South Pacific is.
https://www.nationstates.net/region=south_pacific
https://www.nationstates.net/region=the_south_pacific
by Karafuto-cho » Sat Mar 04, 2017 7:47 pm
by Karafuto-cho » Sun Mar 05, 2017 3:05 pm
by Mallorea and Riva » Sun Mar 05, 2017 3:15 pm
by Consular » Sun Mar 05, 2017 6:17 pm
Mallorea and Riva wrote:Karafuto-cho wrote:Yet they sticky Cormac's Liberate Illuminti shit?
Did anyone ask in Moderation for it to be stickied? I didn't see such a request, though it's always possible it was missed. We are very good at stickying threads for the SC and GA promptly, but we certainly aren't perfect. It looks like this was stickied from 1:22 a.m. until 12:36 p.m. when I unstickied it. Since I was at it anyways I stickied the other proposal, also at 12:36 p.m. It has nothing to do with importance. We really don't see any difference between one legal SC proposal and another.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement