Because sometimes even national leaders just want to hang out
https://forum.nationstates.net/
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2016 4:36 pmFrustrated Franciscans wrote:In addition I demand a list of everyone who voted for the resolution and then later voted for the repeal. Either they should be kicked out of the WA for voting for the former, or kicked out of the WA for voting for the later.
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2016 6:28 pmPosted: Tue Dec 20, 2016 6:50 pm
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2016 7:25 pmStates of Glory WA Office wrote:Frustrated Franciscans wrote:In addition I demand a list of everyone who voted for the resolution and then later voted for the repeal. Either they should be kicked out of the WA for voting for the former, or kicked out of the WA for voting for the later.
Harold: What about people who voted against both? Should they be kicked in to the WA? I'd be more than happy to do that!
Barbera: Anyway, we support this repeal effort.
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2016 8:11 amStates of Glory WA Office wrote:Harold: What about people who voted against both? Should they be kicked in to the WA? I'd be more than happy to do that!
Unibot III wrote:OOC: I hear the theme song of the Twilight Zone in my head every time I see the WA confidently repeal something it confidently passed a few days before.
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2016 11:06 amPosted: Thu Dec 22, 2016 5:53 amPosted: Thu Dec 22, 2016 10:18 amStates of Glory WA Office wrote:Frustrated Franciscans wrote:In addition I demand a list of everyone who voted for the resolution and then later voted for the repeal. Either they should be kicked out of the WA for voting for the former, or kicked out of the WA for voting for the later.
Harold: What about people who voted against both? Should they be kicked in to the WA? I'd be more than happy to do that!
Barbera: Anyway, we support this repeal effort.
Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2016 10:42 amLibertarain Republicans wrote:States of Glory WA Office wrote:Harold: What about people who voted against both? Should they be kicked in to the WA? I'd be more than happy to do that!
Barbera: Anyway, we support this repeal effort.
Does that mean some people vote based off of which side is "winning" rather than with their own head?
Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2016 10:49 amPosted: Thu Dec 22, 2016 11:05 amLibertarain Republicans wrote:States of Glory WA Office wrote:Harold: What about people who voted against both? Should they be kicked in to the WA? I'd be more than happy to do that!
Barbera: Anyway, we support this repeal effort.
Does that mean some people vote based off of which side is "winning" rather than with their own head?
Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2016 4:40 pmLibertarain Republicans wrote:States of Glory WA Office wrote:Harold: What about people who voted against both? Should they be kicked in to the WA? I'd be more than happy to do that!
Barbera: Anyway, we support this repeal effort.
Does that mean some people vote based off of which side is "winning" rather than with their own head?
Posted: Thu Dec 22, 2016 8:50 pm
From the Osiris Fraternal Order
And the office of the Vizier of World Assembly Affairs“As Ra makes his way across the heavily sky, and the cycle of the universe continues, the people of Osiris and its prosperity of the Nile, after consulting with the community, and the gods Seshat and Ma’at, have determined to vote IN FAVOR OF of the current resolution. The Pharaoh will vote according to the people, and according to Ma’at. His actions are necessary in maintaining the balance between order and chaos, truth and darkness, and Osiris will follow the Pharaoh’s direction. The government of the Osiris Fraternal Order will consider no proposal without the text meeting the requirements of Ma’at. We will continue to uphold our moral responsibilities to the people, maintaining and voting in favor of any proposals that will forward the truth and honor that is expected of all who call Osiris home. Cosmic harmony is only obtainable through expressing the will of Ma’at, and the will of the Pharaoh. Although we have derived at this decision, the author of the proposal - or any party interested - is welcome to present a case that would enlighten the Pharaoh and the community to the purpose of the proposal, and perhaps change the will of the gods, the Pharaoh, and the community. If this interests you, please visit our kingdom and speak your knowledge here. All information is important, and will be presented to Seshat, the goddess of wisdom, knowledge, and writing to help direct the Pharaoh to make the right decision for the people of fraternal order. If you have any questions about Osiris in the World Assembly, please direct them to the office of the Vizier of World Assembly Affairs by sending Syg a telegram. For more general questions regarding Osiris, please direct them to the Pharaoh, Neo Kervoskia. Thank you fellow ambassadors, and author of the current proposal at vote, for your time. Osiris, her people, and the office of the Vizier greatly appreciate your time, and patience.
Best Regards,
The Vizier of World Assembly Affairs, Syg.
Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2016 3:18 pmPosted: Fri Dec 23, 2016 3:20 pmPan-Celtic Union wrote:I feel like this particular subject should have been put under the jurisdiction of the Security Council.
After all, the resolution does specify more clearly that the nuclear materials that would be dealt with are of the weaponized nature and not for production, as well as specifying that generous funds are being given to 'warlike nations'.
I do not think that this resolution necessary belongs in the General Assembly.
Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2016 5:16 pmPosted: Fri Dec 23, 2016 10:14 pmRepeal "Securing Nuclear Materials from dastardly Menaces" was passed 13,394 votes to 4,244.
Posted: Sat Dec 24, 2016 5:44 pmThe Candy Of Bottles wrote:Repeal "Securing Nuclear Materials from dastardly Menaces" was passed 13,394 votes to 4,244.
And good riddance.
Posted: Mon Dec 26, 2016 3:53 am
