Advertisement
by -Mr Money- » Thu Dec 15, 2016 10:27 am
by Neo Danzig » Thu Dec 15, 2016 9:39 pm
-Mr Money- wrote:I'm not sure what condemning CAIN would do other than give them a reason to continue doing whatever it is they do. I am generally against official condemnations, even if they are targeted against those I don't agree with or those that have tried (unsuccessfully) to intimidate me with asinine threats.
by Brunhizzle » Fri Dec 16, 2016 4:55 am
by Varvuk » Fri Dec 16, 2016 8:30 am
Neo Danzig wrote:-Mr Money- wrote:I'm not sure what condemning CAIN would do other than give them a reason to continue doing whatever it is they do. I am generally against official condemnations, even if they are targeted against those I don't agree with or those that have tried (unsuccessfully) to intimidate me with asinine threats.
I'm generally of a similar viewpoint, but that's because a lot of condemnations are targeted towards raiders. CAIN seems to think they're the good guys, so I think a condemnation would affect them a lot more. Additionally, I think the most important part of this campaign is spreading awareness about what CAIN is doing, which I think a condemnation would do.
by Neo Danzig » Fri Dec 16, 2016 9:09 am
Varvuk wrote:Neo Danzig wrote:I'm generally of a similar viewpoint, but that's because a lot of condemnations are targeted towards raiders. CAIN seems to think they're the good guys, so I think a condemnation would affect them a lot more. Additionally, I think the most important part of this campaign is spreading awareness about what CAIN is doing, which I think a condemnation would do.
correct me if im wrong but your nation name sound like neo nazi when pronounced, ever heard of Dank memes?
whatever, i think you are just nazi nation that defends yours beliefs, and really badly through SC resolution which will not pass.
by Tinhampton » Fri Dec 16, 2016 10:13 am
by The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp » Fri Dec 16, 2016 10:15 am
by -Mr Money- » Fri Dec 16, 2016 10:24 am
The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:"I vote for. Their definition of "Nazi collaborators" is very vague."
by The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp » Fri Dec 16, 2016 10:31 am
Varvuk wrote:this is clearly poorly made nazi attack on CAIN treaty, i rest my case.
by -Mr Money- » Fri Dec 16, 2016 10:33 am
Varvuk wrote:this is clearly poorly made nazi attack on CAIN treaty, i rest my case.
by Cream Sauce » Fri Dec 16, 2016 10:48 am
by Bhang Bhang Duc » Fri Dec 16, 2016 10:54 am
Tim-Opolis wrote:Given the membership of CAIN, this will be stomped into the ground within minutes of going to vote. Have fun.
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.
RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.
Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..
by Red God Rhllor » Fri Dec 16, 2016 10:59 am
by Hashirajima » Fri Dec 16, 2016 11:04 am
Cream Sauce wrote:Although it looks like this is going to be defeated I'm glad someone took a stand against CAIN. They threatened to label us as Nazi collaborators for our embassy with Kaiserreich (which I still don't believe is a Nazi region) despite us never supporting Nazi activities. It feels like they're simply witch hunting.
by Brunhizzle » Fri Dec 16, 2016 11:43 am
where CAIN forces destroyed a native community residing in The NSIA by way of a Liberation
I don't think they even know what a Nazi is.
"I vote for. Their definition of "Nazi collaborators" is very vague."
by Uinted Communist of Africa » Fri Dec 16, 2016 11:45 am
by Brunhizzle » Fri Dec 16, 2016 11:52 am
Uinted Communist of Africa wrote:So what exactly happens when a region gets condemned? Does their economy fall or some thing like that?
by Uinted Communist of Africa » Fri Dec 16, 2016 11:55 am
by Tinhampton » Fri Dec 16, 2016 11:57 am
by The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp » Fri Dec 16, 2016 11:59 am
Brunhizzle wrote:"I vote for. Their definition of "Nazi collaborators" is very vague."
It's not, really. If you give military assistance to a Nazi Region or assist them in furthering their diplomatic agenda by maintaining an embassy with them, without being an embassy collecting region, you're labeled as a Nazi Collaborator. Pretty straightforward.
Brunhizzle wrote:
1. Definitions
Nazi Collaborator: A region recognized by CAIN as a region that assists in furthering the agenda of, and/or shares core beliefs with, Nazism and/or Nazi Regions.
by Tinhampton » Fri Dec 16, 2016 12:03 pm
The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:Brunhizzle wrote:
1. Definitions
Nazi Collaborator: A region recognized by CAIN as a region that assists in furthering the agenda of, and/or shares core beliefs with, Nazism and/or Nazi Regions.
"So, as head of CAIN, In theory you can call every region in the world a 'Nazi Collaborator' beacuse the vaguely did something that vaguely suports nazism without context."
Constitution wrote:4. General Provisions
(f) This treaty may be amended by a vote of three-fourths of signatories. Such amendments must then be ratified by the signatories before being considered binding. Amendments will be announced in the CAIN Gameplay thread, after which signatories have two weeks to decide whether they wish to ratify the amendment or not. If no progress has been made on the ratification process after those two weeks the region will no longer be considered a signatory.
(g) Any signatory may opt-out of ratifying amendments to CAIN. After doing so, they will no longer be considered a signatory.
by -Mr Money- » Fri Dec 16, 2016 12:09 pm
by Tinhampton » Fri Dec 16, 2016 12:11 pm
-Mr Money- wrote:There is no official definition for Nazi that I am aware of, indeed National Socialism has differing branches, such as Hitlerism, that believe in different things. How can anyone call someone a Nazi without it being a form of verbal insult? It's like calling someone a Communist, just because they're left wing, again the same thing applies there. Don't get me wrong, I'm very much against the actions of the Third Reich, but the word Nazi is a vague word designed to deceive and insult others.
To clarify, I voted against this Resolution.
Constitution wrote:1. Definitions
Nazism: The ideology and practice associated with the 20th-century German Nazi Party and Nazi state, as well as other far-right groups. In the context of NationStates, it is an ideology that glorifies National Socialism or Nazi Germany and/or actively practices Nazi beliefs such as antisemitism, pseudo-scientific racism, racial hygiene, slaughter for living space, genocide, eugenics, persecution of LGBT, etc.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement