Advertisement
by Patrykstan » Mon Oct 24, 2016 9:41 am
by Leppikania » Mon Oct 24, 2016 10:08 am
%NATION%,
Click HERE to approve the condemnation for The Invaders, a colossal stain on international reputation.
by Bhang Bhang Duc » Mon Oct 24, 2016 10:13 am
Marid wrote:Is it just me or is the quality of SC resolutions going down significantly in the recent days? This is probably the worst resolution I've seen since I joined the site. I realize that it's a joke but isn't their an approval or a quorum process where WA delegates review these before they go forward? Is there not a minimum standard that is generally accepted among regional delegates, or am I misunderstanding how the SC resolutions get to the floor for a vote?
No disrespect meant to the person who posted this of course; I'm sure it was a joke and it's not that big of a deal but it is weird that no one inspected this.
We have a group of delegates who will rubber stamp any proposal regardless of quality or legality. Add to this those who just saw "ebil raiders" and approved it. Very soon there's a critical mass of lemmings.
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.
RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.
Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..
by Kalinski » Mon Oct 24, 2016 11:11 am
Forodhar wrote:Sorry, I am quite new to this...
What is bad against condemning a region?
Why are people upset this got to quorum?
by We Are Not the NSA » Mon Oct 24, 2016 11:28 am
Mercs of old wrote:so Belgium got taken over
Forodhar wrote:Sorry, I am quite new to this...
What is bad against condemning a region?
Why are people upset this got to quorum?
Marid wrote:Is it just me or is the quality of SC resolutions going down significantly in the recent days? This is probably the worst resolution I've seen since I joined the site. I realize that it's a joke but isn't their an approval or a quorum process where WA delegates review these before they go forward? Is there not a minimum standard that is generally accepted among regional delegates, or am I misunderstanding how the SC resolutions get to the floor for a vote?
No disrespect meant to the person who posted this of course; I'm sure it was a joke and it's not that big of a deal but it is weird that no one inspected this.
Raiding History | Security Council | Dear Natives | TWP Raid |
by Bhang Bhang Duc » Mon Oct 24, 2016 11:51 am
Mercs of old wrote:so Belgium got taken over
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.
RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.
Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..
by States of Glory » Mon Oct 24, 2016 1:08 pm
Leppikania wrote:For those interested, here's the campaign telegram that somehow managed to get the proposal to quorum (Thanks to Excidium Planetis for the copy):%NATION%,
Click HERE to approve the condemnation for The Invaders, a colossal stain on international reputation.
by Eldridge Crossings » Mon Oct 24, 2016 3:37 pm
by Tretrid » Mon Oct 24, 2016 6:50 pm
by Wallenburg » Mon Oct 24, 2016 7:01 pm
Tretrid wrote:EDIT: Maybe the nation that submitted it spent too much time at the WA Stranger's bar.
by Imperium Anglorum » Mon Oct 24, 2016 8:34 pm
by Pangur Ban » Tue Oct 25, 2016 12:23 am
by HighHaar » Tue Oct 25, 2016 2:31 am
by Bears Armed » Tue Oct 25, 2016 3:29 am
by Wallenburg » Tue Oct 25, 2016 5:00 am
by Novus Niciae » Tue Oct 25, 2016 6:00 am
by Mercs of old » Tue Oct 25, 2016 7:58 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement