I don't know if people remember what the deal was with this one, so to summarize it: DEN was originally condemned in SC #187, but it wasn't the best resolution ever, and it was repealed by SC #191. When it was repealed, we went for a few weeks of getting poorly written attempts to replace it before a legit replacement started drafting, but SC #192 was submitted before the drafted condemnation. The text of SC #192 is listed below, and it is atrocious. There are a dozen major grammatical errors, and several factual errors as well. The condemnation also omits several important facts. The author said that English wasn't his first language, to which we all responded "then why didn't you post it to the forum?", to which he changed his explanation to "I did a bad job on purpose, to make DEN feel bad," to which we all responded with "Bullshit."
I think
The Security Council,
Reminded that the author of SC #192 "Condemn DEN" was unaware of the typical procedures of the Security Council, and therefore neglected to seek assistance from their fellow Security Council members in drafting their proposal,
Noting that despite heavy criticism, and the disapproval of many well known World Assembly members, delegates, and authors, SC #192 was passed,
Deciding that SC #192 is, frankly, poorly written and riddled with factual errors,
Disturbed by the fact that SC #192 attempts to downplay the act of invading by referring to said activity as a mere “sport”,
Observing that despite the author’s claims that DEN was known for “destroying small regions”, DEN was actually never successful in destroying any inhabited regions,
Exasperated by SC #192’s inclusion of DEN’s intelligence gathering and embassy forming as condemnable acts, seeing as the strategies employed by DEN in these areas are widely used in various other large regions,
Bewildered that SC #192 only includes three examples of DEN raids, neglecting to note the far more important raids that DEN committed on Paradoxia, Power is Rising, Japan, Union of Proletarian States, California, St Abbaddon, Yorkshire, and NeoConfederate States of America,
Pointing out that one of the few examples of a DEN raid SC #192 identifies was an incident in September 2015 involving an internal coup of The West Pacific, in which DEN was the primary region providing support to a rogue Delegate, which is not widely considered to be a raid beyond DEN propaganda,
Cringing at the timing of this proposal, going into effect directly before a major scandal resulted in the complete annihilation of the region known as DEN, the fallout of which has made the region permanently uninhabitable,
Concluding that the only reason SC #192 was passed was due to the belief that many uninformed World Assembly members held that this proposal was the replacement for SC #187 Condemn DEN, which had recently been repealed, unaware that SC #192 was submitted while the replacement proposal was still being drafted,
Finding that while it is important for the Security Council to take action against Predatory regions that cause harm to others, it is equally important that the Security Council upholds its long held traditions and procedures, and hoping that removing this resolution will help encourage other aspiring Security Council authors to present their proposals for drafting before submission,
Believing that due to SC #192’s poor quality, factual inaccuracies and exclusion of major events, the Resolution should be removed from the record,
Hereby Repeals Security Council Resolution #192 "Condemn DEN".
Edit 5: Preemptive explanation of the "Predatory" thing: at no point has anyone ever used the term "Predatory regions" to describe what that phrase makes us all think of, and I am not using it to describe what we're all thinking of. Predatory means "seeking to exploit or oppress others" and DEN was a region that exploited others, therefore DEN was a Predatory region.
I'm in no rush to submit this, and since the SC is otherwise dead right now I figured it wouldn't hurt to do something potentially controversial, if you know what I mean.
Thoughts?
Edit 1: Minor changes.
Edit 2: It was Wallenburg who was writing the repeal, not Kaboom.
Edit 3: More minor changes.
Edit 4: More minor changes.
