[PASSED] Repeal "Liberate The Place That Has No Big Banks"

[Rich thorn]

Due to the fact that I am now a native I fully support this proposal

[The Rouge Christmas State]

Full support when this is proposed.

[Imperium Anglorum]

New natives?? Are you kidding me? They're not natives, there's no community there and they are invaders. The region is just another trophy now. If you consider holding puppets in a region that you have no intent of actually using or establishing anything as grounds to be called NATIVES then you have no idea what you're talking about.

The founder is always a native because natives are those with the most influence in a region and the founder has infinite influence. NSA is the founder. Therefore, NSA is a native. He supports the repeal. Therefore, there is native support. Where are the flaws in this logic chain?

[DAFT Universe]

New natives?? Are you kidding me? They're not natives, there's no community there and they are invaders. The region is just another trophy now. If you consider holding puppets in a region that you have no intent of actually using or establishing anything as grounds to be called NATIVES then you have no idea what you're talking about.

The founder is always a native because natives are those with the most influence in a region and the founder has infinite influence. NSA is the founder. Therefore, NSA is a native. He supports the repeal. Therefore, there is native support. Where are the flaws in this logic chain?

Yep. Absolutly flawless.

[Yodle]

New natives?? Are you kidding me? They're not natives, there's no community there and they are invaders. The region is just another trophy now. If you consider holding puppets in a region that you have no intent of actually using or establishing anything as grounds to be called NATIVES then you have no idea what you're talking about.

The founder is always a native because natives are those with the most influence in a region and the founder has infinite influence. NSA is the founder. Therefore, NSA is a native. He supports the repeal. Therefore, there is native support. Where are the flaws in this logic chain?

... So by your logic as soon as a native is banned/ejected from their region they're no longer a native of that region since they no longer have influence in the region? Okay. I'll be sure to quote you later.

[Wallenburg]

The founder is always a native because natives are those with the most influence in a region and the founder has infinite influence. NSA is the founder. Therefore, NSA is a native. He supports the repeal. Therefore, there is native support. Where are the flaws in this logic chain?

... So by your logic as soon as a native is banned/ejected from their region they're no longer a native of that region since they no longer have influence in the region? Okay. I'll be sure to quote you later.

That's not even remotely what IA said.

[Yodle]

... So by your logic as soon as a native is banned/ejected from their region they're no longer a native of that region since they no longer have influence in the region? Okay. I'll be sure to quote you later.

That's not even remotely what IA said.

Think about it, he's saying a native is someone who has a lot of influence in the region, if they're no longer within the region they no longer have influence, making them no longer a native. I'm taking his logic and showing how it's a stupid definition for a "native"

[Wallenburg]

That's not even remotely what IA said.

Think about it, he's saying a native is someone who has a lot of influence in the region, if they're no longer within the region they no longer have influence, making them no longer a native. I'm taking his logic and showing how it's a stupid definition for a "native"

You don't have to be in a region to have influence on it.

[Liddell Hart]

That's not even remotely what IA said.

Think about it, he's saying a native is someone who has a lot of influence in the region, if they're no longer within the region they no longer have influence, making them no longer a native. I'm taking his logic and showing how it's a stupid definition for a "native"

When a nation leaves a region, either voluntarily or by forced means, their accrued influence begins to decay every update until it is gone. I don't think it is accurate to say founder's have infinite influence in technical terms, but they always have access to region controls whether they are in the region or not, and it never cost them influence to make changes to the region.

Honestly, your best shot at liberating your old region was for all of you to keep your native nations in the region, forcing us to spend our influence trying to eject/ban you all. You could just have easily set up your more secure second home and moved new nations there. By evacuating the region, you basically handed it over. Seeing recent Fenda successes, I imagine you could have rallied some support for a liberation attempt.

Edited for spelling.

[We Are Not the NSA]

I have to work this afternoon, so I will be submitting this tomorrow afternoon.

[Nohbdy]

Submitted for your approval.

[Panzer Vier]

Nooo, my shiny liberate badge D:

I fully support the repeal, though. Shouldn't have come to a liberation in the first place, considering the native exodus.

[Imperium American]

I fully support this resolution.

[We Are Not the NSA]

Right, I guess I'm not the only one who forgot to do this, so:

Repeal "Liberate The Place that has No Big Banks" was passed 11,617 votes to 2,578.

[Kaboomlandia]

Thanks for taking this on, NSA - much appreciated. My RL schedule really didn't permit me to see this through to the end.