Page 1 of 1

[PASSED] Repeal "Liberate The Arab League"

PostPosted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 12:16 pm
by The Puddle Jumping Wads of Wrapper
Since nothing seemed to be happening with this, and Hatay expressed to me privately that he indeed wants the liberation repealed, I put together this short-and-sweet repeal. Since I have stamps to waste on this puppet, I've promised Hatay that a campaign is forthcoming.


Repeal "Liberate The Arab League"
A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation.

Category: Repeal | Resolution: SC#198 | Proposed by: Wrapper



Description: WA Security Council Resolution #198: Liberate The Arab League shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: The Security Council:

Pleased that The Arab League, recently liberated by this council, has overcome the invasion by Nazi Europa;

Satisfied that the liberation has accomplished its desired effect, as the threat has subsided and the invading forces ousted;

Yearning for complete control of the region to be returned to native nations, which have expressed a desire to govern their region autonomously and secure their borders as they see fit;

Concluding that this liberation is no longer befitting nor desired;

Hereby repeals SC#198, "Liberate The Arab League".

PostPosted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 12:57 pm
by Bhang Bhang Duc
Full support - have asked TWP's Delegate to approve.

PostPosted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 2:11 pm
by Oceanias Elena Inge Dreyden
We approved this.

PostPosted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 2:14 pm
by Cormactopia II
Full support, and I've approved it.

PostPosted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 2:29 pm
by We Are Not the NSA
Full support, and I have approved it... That's fun to say. :)

PostPosted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 2:33 pm
by The Puddle Jumping Wads of Wrapper
For the record:

To all WA Delegates:

We are writing today to request your approval of our Security Council proposal to Repeal "Liberate The Arab League".

Perhaps you've heard about the recent invasion of The Arab League by forces from Nazi Europa. Fortunately, the invaders' plans to oppress and obliterate the region were thwarted, due in part to the liberation that was recently passed. Thankfully, the natives are back in control of the region, and their regional delegate, Hatay, has asked the Security Council to repeal this liberation, so that the region may take back control of its own borders and govern itself as its native nations see fit.

We ask that you approve and, when it reaches quorum, vote in favor of this repeal.

page=UN_view_proposal/id=wrapper_1465326212

Thank you,

The Puddle Jumping Wads of Wrapper

PostPosted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 3:26 pm
by Europe and Oceania
We Are Not the NSA wrote:Full support, and I have approved it... That's fun to say. :)


VERY fun, comrade. That's what I say all of the time, comrade.

PostPosted: Wed Jun 08, 2016 4:27 am
by The Puddle Jumping Wads of Wrapper
Ladies and gentlemen, we've attained a quorum. Voting will begin in about four hours. Thank you all for your support.

PostPosted: Fri Jun 10, 2016 6:41 pm
by Adytus
"Looks like the proposal was quick and easy business, Wad Ari Alaz."

PostPosted: Fri Jun 10, 2016 6:53 pm
by Wrapper
Adytus wrote:"Looks like the proposal was quick and easy business, Wad Ari Alaz."

I only post out of character in the SC, but thanks. This one was a no-brainer.

PostPosted: Fri Jun 10, 2016 6:54 pm
by Adytus
Wrapper wrote:
Adytus wrote:"Looks like the proposal was quick and easy business, Wad Ari Alaz."

I only post out of character in the SC, but thanks. This one was a no-brainer.


OCC: I enjoy being IC in the SC. Adds another layer to my game, and yeah a no-brainer.

PostPosted: Fri Jun 10, 2016 6:58 pm
by Wrapper
Adytus wrote:
Wrapper wrote:I only post out of character in the SC, but thanks. This one was a no-brainer.


OCC: I enjoy being IC in the SC. Adds another layer to my game, and yeah a no-brainer.

No sweat. Completely within your rights to do so, and nothing wrong with it, but about 90% of what's here is OOC.

PostPosted: Fri Jun 10, 2016 7:02 pm
by Adytus
Wrapper wrote:
Adytus wrote:
OCC: I enjoy being IC in the SC. Adds another layer to my game, and yeah a no-brainer.

No sweat. Completely within your rights to do so, and nothing wrong with it, but about 90% of what's here is OOC.


O' the admirable 10%! :P

PostPosted: Sat Jun 11, 2016 8:16 am
by Floor 448
:blink: I don't think I've ever seen a resolution passing by this much...

Then again, I've only been around for about a year :unsure: (disregard this nation's population.)

My brother's (WA) nation just CTE'd today, so I get to be in the WA now :)

PostPosted: Sat Jun 11, 2016 1:41 pm
by Decepticonistan
Why are we so quick to repeal? We should stick around a bit. You know, "help rebuild".

PostPosted: Sat Jun 11, 2016 4:15 pm
by The Puddle Jumping Wads of Wrapper
Decepticonistan wrote:Why are we so quick to repeal? We should stick around a bit. You know, "help rebuild".

There is no reason to do so. The natives have made it clear they want to control their own borders and have asked for a repeal.

PostPosted: Sat Jun 11, 2016 4:31 pm
by Decepticonistan
The Puddle Jumping Wads of Wrapper wrote:
Decepticonistan wrote:Why are we so quick to repeal? We should stick around a bit. You know, "help rebuild".

There is no reason to do so. The natives have made it clear they want to control their own borders and have asked for a repeal.


The natives may have made it clear. But the natives have just experienced and tumultuous event that has ravaged their country? Whose to say that they aren't vulnerable to another attack for which they won't be completely annihilated? Whose to say civil war doesn't erupt and a power vacuum occurs that allows for the rise of a less "friendly" government. One that wants revenge and reignites a conflict. We'll be forced to make more resolutions to try and stabilize a region. Plus, we should be sending a message that this alliance isn't free and comes with a price.

PostPosted: Sat Jun 11, 2016 4:34 pm
by Drasnia
Decepticonistan wrote:
The Puddle Jumping Wads of Wrapper wrote:There is no reason to do so. The natives have made it clear they want to control their own borders and have asked for a repeal.


The natives may have made it clear. But the natives have just experienced and tumultuous event that has ravaged their country? Whose to say that they aren't vulnerable to another attack for which they won't be completely annihilated? Whose to say civil war doesn't erupt and a power vacuum occurs that allows for the rise of a less "friendly" government. One that wants revenge and reignites a conflict. We'll be forced to make more resolutions to try and stabilize a region. Plus, we should be sending a message that this alliance isn't free and comes with a price.

The natives say so. I trust them with knowing how best to run their own region.

PostPosted: Sat Jun 11, 2016 8:04 pm
by We Are Not the NSA
Decepticonistan wrote:
The Puddle Jumping Wads of Wrapper wrote:There is no reason to do so. The natives have made it clear they want to control their own borders and have asked for a repeal.


The natives may have made it clear. But the natives have just experienced and tumultuous event that has ravaged their country? Whose to say that they aren't vulnerable to another attack for which they won't be completely annihilated? Whose to say civil war doesn't erupt and a power vacuum occurs that allows for the rise of a less "friendly" government. One that wants revenge and reignites a conflict. We'll be forced to make more resolutions to try and stabilize a region. Plus, we should be sending a message that this alliance isn't free and comes with a price.

But... This alliance is free...

PostPosted: Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:25 pm
by Wrapper
Repeal "Liberate The Arab League" was passed 14,447 votes to 884.

PostPosted: Sun Jun 12, 2016 2:05 pm
by New Dukaine
Wrapper wrote:
Repeal "Liberate The Arab League" was passed 14,447 votes to 884.

Grats wrapper on passing the 200th resolution of the Security Council!

Also those 884 people that voted against....wtf?

PostPosted: Sun Jun 12, 2016 6:06 pm
by Kaboomlandia
Unless I'm mistaken, this is the biggest margin of passage for any WA proposal, GA or SC, at 94.2%. Infectious Disease Control had around 93.5% percent.

PostPosted: Sun Jun 12, 2016 6:38 pm
by We Are Not the NSA
Kaboomlandia wrote:Unless I'm mistaken, this is the biggest margin of passage for any WA proposal, GA or SC, at 94.2%. Infectious Disease Control had around 93.5% percent.

There was literally no reason to vote against it, and it was not poorly written. Good combination.

PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2016 6:50 am
by The Puddle Jumping Wads of Wrapper
We Are Not the NSA wrote:it was not poorly written

Thank you for such high praise. ;)

PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2016 8:06 pm
by Luxdonia
We Are Not the NSA wrote:
Kaboomlandia wrote:Unless I'm mistaken, this is the biggest margin of passage for any WA proposal, GA or SC, at 94.2%. Infectious Disease Control had around 93.5% percent.

There was literally no reason to vote against it, and it was not poorly written. Good combination.

Something which is quite rare in our esteemed World Assembly. :p