Alright.
Advertisement
by Luminesa » Sat Mar 19, 2016 8:38 am
by Sibling land » Sat Mar 19, 2016 8:44 am
by Luminesa » Sat Mar 19, 2016 8:46 am
Sibling land wrote:I am sorry to everyone that said they would not vote for. I am almost sympathetic to you. If you are voting against, answer me this. Do you want your country overrun by raiders?
by We Are Not the NSA » Sat Mar 19, 2016 9:00 am
Sibling land wrote:I am sorry to everyone that said they would not vote for. I am almost sympathetic to you. If you are voting against, answer me this. Do you want your country overrun by raiders?
Raiding History | Security Council | Dear Natives | TWP Raid |
by Maltropia » Sat Mar 19, 2016 9:49 am
Sibling land wrote:I am sorry to everyone that said they would not vote for. I am almost sympathetic to you. If you are voting against, answer me this. Do you want your country overrun by raiders?
by Veniristan » Sat Mar 19, 2016 9:50 am
by Naginii » Sat Mar 19, 2016 1:36 pm
Petrines wrote:The Bulldog Protection League wrote:
IS ANYTHING GOOD ENOUGH FOR YOU PEOPLE? DEN is an evil regime and we can't condemn them because of WORDING! WE ARE BEING WAAAAAAAAAY TO PICKY. DEN must, MUST, be condemned by the WA. If you can't realize that you are just as bad as DEN!!!!
That's how we humans are, unfortunately. Because of our ignorance, we are (in this case) more concerned on looks (such as the proposal's "wording") than what beneficial outcome/s it could possibly give us.
Personally, I think the "wording" is average. Not too horrible, but not too good either. It's somewhere in between. But it wouldn't be any reason for me not to vote. I don't care if condemnation can do nothing but give them "badges." If the Security Council is not as beneficial to the game like what others said then we can't do anything about it unless Max Barry does something big that will actually make the Security Council a force not to be reckoned with. After all, it's called a Security Council for a reason. No matter how much we rant, we scream in caps lock etc. Others are just doing their job and I'm just doing my job as a part of the World Assembly and voted (I voted for) for what I think is best. No matter if that is how the gaming style of others are, it still does not give them a good reason to take over a region forcefully. Some might be okay with it. But remember, there will always be people who won't like it. Saying you're against it because it's the gaming style of others is like saying North Korea's actions in threatening its neighbors with nukes is completely acceptable because that's how Kim Jong Un likes to rule. This is a Security Council. Of course we should be concerned as to what other regions are doing. And as a body of individuals who chose to join or participate in the council, we should set aside our ignorance, opinions and keep an open mind and think what is good or bad for the gaming community as a whole. With this said, I think DEN should be punished one way or another even though condemning might not change a thing. If you think you can get away with what you've done. You're not.
by Lychgate » Sat Mar 19, 2016 1:41 pm
Veniristan wrote:I, a perfectly unbiased member of the community, see no reason why such an upright Region of NS should be condemned
Lychgatean News Center: Design studies for the Imperator-class of battleship have been completed. ||| The current IASA level is [5]
by The Faithful of Numenor » Sat Mar 19, 2016 2:04 pm
The Bulldog Protection League wrote:Pax In Terra wrote:The wording of this is terrible.
IS ANYTHING GOOD ENOUGH FOR YOU PEOPLE? DEN is an evil regime and we can't condemn them because of WORDING! WE ARE BEING WAAAAAAAAAY TO PICKY. DEN must, MUST, be condemned by the WA. If you can't realize that you are just as bad as DEN!!!!
by The Faithful of Numenor » Sat Mar 19, 2016 2:08 pm
Maltropia wrote:Sibling land wrote:I am sorry to everyone that said they would not vote for. I am almost sympathetic to you. If you are voting against, answer me this. Do you want your country overrun by raiders?
My region already has been and I'm still voting against because even a well-written resolution wouldn't do anything.
by John Turner » Sat Mar 19, 2016 2:14 pm
The Faithful of Numenor wrote: We should be condemning raiding NOT DEN!
The Faithful of Numenor wrote:Even then we don't make the laws we just do things like propose liberation's, and condemnation's. It's the General Assembly who should be first communicating and reasoning with DEN.
The Faithful of Numenor wrote:If DEN attacks places like idk the Pacific Ocean? Then we should condemn but this is not the time nor the place.
The Faithful of Numenor wrote:With all do respect WA members, you proposing a condemnation will take too long and besides when it is over it will be too late to stop DEN.
The Faithful of Numenor wrote:All I am seeing (once again with all due respect) is a repeat of Trade Federation (DEN) Invading Naboo (other regions) and the Republic (WA) just sits there and DEBATES about it!!!!!
John Turner wrote:Oh.... And it wasn't drafted on the forums. That makes it automatically illegal, doesn't it?
by The LBP Union » Sat Mar 19, 2016 2:23 pm
There are reports that a man is sitting in a can. No further information is available. LittleBigPlanet servers are still offline. Stay tuned for further details.
by We Are Not the NSA » Sat Mar 19, 2016 3:21 pm
The Faithful of Numenor wrote:Maltropia wrote:My region already has been and I'm still voting against because even a well-written resolution wouldn't do anything.
With all do respect WA members, you proposing a condemnation will take too long and besides when it is over it will be too late to stop DEN. All I am seeing (once again with all due respect) is a repeat of Trade Federation (DEN) Invading Naboo (other regions) and the Republic (WA) just sits there and DEBATES about it!!!!!
Raiding History | Security Council | Dear Natives | TWP Raid |
by The Shire and Bree-land » Sat Mar 19, 2016 3:58 pm
Naginii wrote:Petrines wrote:That's how we humans are, unfortunately. Because of our ignorance, we are (in this case) more concerned on looks (such as the proposal's "wording") than what beneficial outcome/s it could possibly give us.
Personally, I think the "wording" is average. Not too horrible, but not too good either. It's somewhere in between. But it wouldn't be any reason for me not to vote. I don't care if condemnation can do nothing but give them "badges." If the Security Council is not as beneficial to the game like what others said then we can't do anything about it unless Max Barry does something big that will actually make the Security Council a force not to be reckoned with. After all, it's called a Security Council for a reason. No matter how much we rant, we scream in caps lock etc. Others are just doing their job and I'm just doing my job as a part of the World Assembly and voted (I voted for) for what I think is best. No matter if that is how the gaming style of others are, it still does not give them a good reason to take over a region forcefully. Some might be okay with it. But remember, there will always be people who won't like it. Saying you're against it because it's the gaming style of others is like saying North Korea's actions in threatening its neighbors with nukes is completely acceptable because that's how Kim Jong Un likes to rule. This is a Security Council. Of course we should be concerned as to what other regions are doing. And as a body of individuals who chose to join or participate in the council, we should set aside our ignorance, opinions and keep an open mind and think what is good or bad for the gaming community as a whole. With this said, I think DEN should be punished one way or another even though condemning might not change a thing. If you think you can get away with what you've done. You're not.
DEN is only "getting away" with playing a legal gametype you don't like.
Raiding isn't illegal, so there's nothing to "get away with."
by We Are Not the NSA » Sat Mar 19, 2016 4:15 pm
The Shire and Bree-land wrote:Naginii wrote:
DEN is only "getting away" with playing a legal gametype you don't like.
Raiding isn't illegal, so there's nothing to "get away with."
If condemning DEN won't work (which it obviously won't) then what else is there that we can do? I mean besides waiting for an outcome. If there isn't anything we can do then... I fear that DEN will start picking other regions to raid, including the regions that we're in.
Raiding History | Security Council | Dear Natives | TWP Raid |
by The Puddle Jumping Wads of Wrapper » Sat Mar 19, 2016 4:18 pm
by Wallenburg » Sat Mar 19, 2016 4:28 pm
by The Dolanets Islands » Sat Mar 19, 2016 6:24 pm
by We Are Not the NSA » Sat Mar 19, 2016 6:59 pm
The Dolanets islands wrote:http://imgur.com/BRZxAnE
DEN is actually helping. This is Portugal r's freedoms after DEN liberated it's citizens.
Glory to DEN and Gest!
Raiding History | Security Council | Dear Natives | TWP Raid |
by John Turner » Sat Mar 19, 2016 7:31 pm
John Turner wrote:Oh.... And it wasn't drafted on the forums. That makes it automatically illegal, doesn't it?
by Solarmania » Sat Mar 19, 2016 9:42 pm
by The Bruce » Sat Mar 19, 2016 11:46 pm
by Roosevetania » Sun Mar 20, 2016 5:32 am
We Are Not the NSA wrote:
French isn't my first language, but I still paid attention during class. Either way, if this proposal, which was submitted to an English speaking body, had gone through any drafting at all, someone who does speak English as a first language could have helped fix it.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement