Advertisement
by Bhang Bhang Duc » Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:50 pm
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.
RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.
Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..
by Ovybia » Fri Jan 22, 2016 3:50 pm
Noting the acts of aggression committed by the DEN war machine against innocent regions and recognizing it as a threat,
Please approve Child Destruction Ban. If you don't, the Ovybian dragon will come eat you. | Prolife? Consider joining Right to Life, one of the 100 largest regions of NS | Signature Details |
Practicing courteousness in an NS argument never hurt anyone.
Disclaimer: Admittedly sometimes I need to take my own advice.
by Wallenburg » Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:21 pm
Ovybia wrote:I think this resolution is ridiculous. As it says it its opening:Noting the acts of aggression committed by the DEN war machine against innocent regions and recognizing it as a threat,
So you admit it should be condemned? Why are you trying to repeal it? I don't think minor grammar problems should call for an entirely new condemn proposal.
by We Are Not the NSA » Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:33 pm
TheGemini wrote:I'm sorry but I think passing this repeal is a huge mistake and causes a huge security crisis..a global one.
Raiding History | Security Council | Dear Natives | TWP Raid |
by Wallenburg » Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:34 pm
TheGemini wrote:I'm sorry but I think passing this repeal is a huge mistake and causes a huge security crisis..a global one.
by Wrapper » Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:40 pm
Weest Korea wrote:I hope this doesn't get passed. DEN deserved their condemnation.
by Alpinovia » Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:37 pm
by Alpinovia » Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:38 pm
TheGemini wrote:I'm sorry but I think passing this repeal is a huge mistake and causes a huge security crisis..a global one.
by Xoriet » Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:45 pm
by Paffnia » Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:33 pm
by Consular » Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:01 pm
by The Silver Sentinel » Fri Jan 22, 2016 11:39 pm
Consular wrote:There is a very large bloc of nations who have no idea what the SC actually does I think.
by Druznia » Sat Jan 23, 2016 3:35 am
by Flanderlion » Sat Jan 23, 2016 4:00 am
by Edenwood » Sat Jan 23, 2016 10:52 am
by Vancouvia » Sat Jan 23, 2016 11:49 am
Edenwood wrote:Calling someone out on their grammer in a resolution in my opinion is quite unnecessary and unprofessional, that is something that should be done in private.
Using the term NationStates in a resolution as it is in Condemn Den is also quite unnecessary. Terms such as The World, World stage or/and World affairs would be much more appropriate in my view.
I am voting FOR your appeal not because of your appeal but because of the blantant and continual use of the term NationStates in the resolution with which you wish to repeal
by Wallenburg » Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:44 pm
Acknowledging the destruction that the raiding region DEN has caused throughout the Multiverse, and applauding efforts to combat belligerent regions such as DEN, I support this well-written repeal. Its argument speaks for itself: the condemnation is sloppy, difficult to read, and oftentimes misrepresentative of the reality of DEN's actions. Furthermore, it stands as self-evident that raiding organizations such as DEN receive condemnations not as stains on their reputations but as signature badges of honor, hard-won prizes for their exceptional success in laying waste to innocent regions. For this reason, I encourage and advocate the repeal of this ridiculously asinine condemnation, and I shall oppose any effort to establish a new condemnation of DEN, on the grounds that it shall only strengthen this raiding organization's ranks and increase its power over the Multiverse.
by Consular » Sat Jan 23, 2016 4:37 pm
Vancouvia wrote:Edenwood wrote:Calling someone out on their grammer in a resolution in my opinion is quite unnecessary and unprofessional, that is something that should be done in private.
Using the term NationStates in a resolution as it is in Condemn Den is also quite unnecessary. Terms such as The World, World stage or/and World affairs would be much more appropriate in my view.
I am voting FOR your appeal not because of your appeal but because of the blantant and continual use of the term NationStates in the resolution with which you wish to repeal
I'm going to TG you that it's spelled "grammar"
by Maltropia » Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:50 pm
Edenwood wrote:Calling someone out on their grammer in a resolution in my opinion is quite unnecessary and unprofessional, that is something that should be done in private.
by Edenwood » Sun Jan 24, 2016 12:46 am
Maltropia wrote:Including such poor grammar in a resolution is unnecessary and unprofessional
Maltropia wrote: and calling someone out on it should be done publicly
Maltropia wrote: so that everyone knows not to commit such a heinous act in future.
by Wallenburg » Sun Jan 24, 2016 1:36 am
Edenwood wrote:Maltropia wrote: and calling someone out on it should be done publicly
not in a proper resolution they shouldn't. if you must resort to public shaming then do it during the drafting phase... i do not want to nor should i have to witness it...in the same way that i have no desire to see my favorite rock band call out their singer for forgetting lyrics i have no desire to see people called out on grammar(or similar) when i go to vote on something
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement