A mean old man wrote:Naw, I'd then remind you that it's the norm for co-authors to be announced at the end of the proposal.
Missing the point. Announcing yourself at the start of a resolution isn't good form. A resolution is action taken by the World Assembly/The Secucity Council, not by you. Putting your name at the start suggests its you doing it.
As was "shitty proposal writing" to symbolize what it was named for, but that was deemed illegal as it was purely symbolic. As far as I can tell, this resolution's no better, however it's a liberation rather than a C/C.
If this hadn't been passed already and was proposed nowadays, it would be deemed illegal by the moderators.
I don't believe so. Condemn Shitty Proposal Writing was deemed illegal because there was no evidence that the region was for shitty proposals - you'd put the WFE against it.
Not sure I know what you mean - of course it has overcome the challenge of not being used - in fact, I think it's becoming rather overused. I don't know what other interpretation could be made here.
Its not underused, but there are still many individuals who vote against SC resolutions because they get in the way of GA ones - which suggests the SC is still in the shadow of the GA.
Of course, that's what some people may be deceived into thinking when they see a region named "The Security Council" and a WA body called "The Security Council." I'm just making it clear to them that there's a difference, and that the region isn't, technically, any more linked to the official WA than every other region there is in the world. Did you have a different opinion?
Of course its not officially linked, but people aren't stupid. They know that the region United Nations wasn't the old NSUN, and they know that the region The Security Council isn't the body. Also, I don't see how making this clear is an argument to repeal the liberation.
Though all following passed liberations are made for security purposes, and the description of the liberation category itself is "A resolution to strike down Delegate-imposed barriers to free entry in a region." There were no delegate-imposed barriers in the case of this region, and there was and is no threat to the region's security...
Preventative liberations, where there isn't an threat to the region, are legal. Ard said that a "Liberate The Security Council resolution would be clunky, but not that it'd be illegal.
UNDERSTANDING the World Assembly Security Council to be an organization that is run by all of the World Assembly members as a whole, and not by a small group of individuals with the same general ideology;
Unless you actually go and claim that the region The Security Council is running the organisation The Security Council, this clause seems irrelevant.
Where does it say that? This isn't saying anything about the resolution or the region, this is just an informative statement...
And just informing people that a "small group of individuals with the same general ideology" are not actually running the WASC is an argument to repeal the liberation, how?
Does this clause say anything about a "community?" Do Topid and Uni not also stand against the usage of C&Cs simply for badges?
And I've already explained that the resolution wasn't about getting a badge. You really should know the reason for it - to get support for/RP the GA-SC split.
Don't try and tell me that its name and liberation weren't aiding factors - it's got the exact same name as a body of the WA, and was put on display for the entire world to see for over 3 days when its liberation was voted on. Don't try and tell me that this didn't acquire it some recognition.
Ah, right. The name has obviously helped get people there... but why on earth does the region using the name constitute an argument to repeal the liberation?
So now I can't wrap up with a conclusion that involves a summary of the ideas expressed? If I just cut it off, that'd harly be good writing style, now would it?
It would be, actually. Thats how most resolutions end. Resolutions aren't essays, you don't need to summarise them.
you mean unlike you did?
