by Wolfstar WA Mission » Mon Jan 26, 2015 9:34 pm
by Todd McCloud » Mon Jan 26, 2015 10:09 pm
Wolfstar WA Mission wrote:The Security Council,
AWARE that Republicans was invaded and passworded by The Greater German Reich on December 20, 2010,
AFFIRMING that Republicans has since been refounded by Jeffersonian Republicans,
NOTING that Jeffersonian Republicans has barred executive powers to any would-be delegates,
CONFIDENT that SC#41 has served it's purpose and should no longer be in effect,
HEREBY repeals Security Council Resolution #41 "Liberate Republicans.
by Wolfstar WA Mission » Mon Jan 26, 2015 10:35 pm
by The Stalker » Mon Jan 26, 2015 10:50 pm
by Wolfstar WA Mission » Mon Jan 26, 2015 10:59 pm
The Stalker wrote:Defunct as it may be, I know the found and region would prefer to keep the liberation in place. I see no good reason to repeal it against their wishes, it's a little piece of NS history.
by The Stalker » Mon Jan 26, 2015 11:05 pm
by Wolfstar WA Mission » Mon Jan 26, 2015 11:14 pm
The Stalker wrote:Maybe so, but Mr WA Mission, might I suggest being a little more original in your resolutions, there are better ways to earn your authorship badge than clipping someone's wings.
by The Stalker » Tue Jan 27, 2015 12:20 am
by Zaolat » Sun Feb 01, 2015 1:49 am
Topid wrote:Will of course be voting against this should it get to vote. Natives want the Lib, and the founder could CTE again.
by Cormac Stark » Mon Feb 02, 2015 6:22 pm
by Chester Pearson » Mon Feb 02, 2015 6:25 pm
Cormac Stark wrote:I don't see anymore point in repealing the resolution than in keeping it. It has no effect either way while the region has a Founder, and if the Founder should cease to exist again in the future this will keep the region safer than it would be without the liberation resolution in place. If natives don't want it repealed, I'm definitely against repeal.
Separatist Peoples wrote:With a lawnchair and a large bag of popcorn in hand, Ambassador SaDiablo walks in and sets himself up comfortably. Out of a dufflebag comes a large foam finger with the name "Chester Pearson" emblazoned on it, as well as a few six-packs.
by Cormac Stark » Mon Feb 02, 2015 6:56 pm
Chester Pearson wrote:Cormac Stark wrote:I don't see anymore point in repealing the resolution than in keeping it. It has no effect either way while the region has a Founder, and if the Founder should cease to exist again in the future this will keep the region safer than it would be without the liberation resolution in place. If natives don't want it repealed, I'm definitely against repeal.
Does Westwind want his commendation repealed? If not, you should definitely be against that repeal.....
by Chester Pearson » Mon Feb 02, 2015 7:00 pm
Separatist Peoples wrote:With a lawnchair and a large bag of popcorn in hand, Ambassador SaDiablo walks in and sets himself up comfortably. Out of a dufflebag comes a large foam finger with the name "Chester Pearson" emblazoned on it, as well as a few six-packs.
by KaelThas Quilor » Mon Feb 02, 2015 7:11 pm
The Bruce wrote:I sometimes suspect that Cerian Quilor is here to harvest the tears of young, ambitious nations.
Cormac Stark wrote:my opinion of me, as usual, is the only one that matters. :p
by Austropia » Mon Feb 02, 2015 11:31 pm
by Aeryis » Tue Feb 03, 2015 7:48 am
by Unibot III » Tue Feb 03, 2015 9:50 am
Aeryis wrote:I can't pretend to understand the history of the situation here, but I do see that the author is no longer a WA member... and I vote against proposals submitted by folks who enroll, submit, and immediately resign on principle.
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by The United Colonies of Earth » Tue Feb 03, 2015 9:52 am
by Evil Wolf » Tue Feb 03, 2015 1:50 pm
The United Colonies of Earth wrote:Voting against. This is a safeguard against the horrors of the past conducted on the region.
Kryozerkia wrote:In the good old days raiding was illegal
Crazy Girl wrote:Invading was never illegal
[violet] wrote:There is supposed to be an invasion game.
by Cormac Stark » Tue Feb 03, 2015 1:58 pm
by Evil Wolf » Tue Feb 03, 2015 2:11 pm
Cormac Stark wrote:The Founder has ceased to exist before. Let's not pretend that you care about safeguards.
Kryozerkia wrote:In the good old days raiding was illegal
Crazy Girl wrote:Invading was never illegal
[violet] wrote:There is supposed to be an invasion game.
by Naginii » Tue Feb 03, 2015 2:20 pm
The Stalker wrote:Defunct as it may be, I know the found and region would prefer to keep the liberation in place. I see no good reason to repeal it against their wishes, it's a little piece of NS history.
by Topid » Tue Feb 03, 2015 3:44 pm
Evil Wolf wrote:Cormac Stark wrote:The Founder has ceased to exist before. Let's not pretend that you care about safeguards.
And yet we repeal Liberation Proposals against founderless regions all the time. They don't have a founder or blocked WA controls, and yet we deem those regions, most of which have just recently been raided, safe enough to repeal their Liberate.
How is it that those regions are now suddenly safe but this one, which was refounded three years ago after being raided nearly half a decade ago and has a founder, is so unsafe we can't repeal its Liberation?
The logic seems to be misplaced.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement