Advertisement
by Clean Land » Mon Oct 23, 2017 1:09 pm
by Fauxia » Mon Oct 23, 2017 1:22 pm
by Araraukar » Mon Oct 23, 2017 3:12 pm
Fauxia wrote:WHAMMO is the greatest committee name I’ve ever heard of.”
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by Fauxia » Mon Oct 23, 2017 3:31 pm
OOC: Well, I guess that’s up there too
by Whovian Tardisia » Mon Oct 23, 2017 7:22 pm
by Bears Armed » Tue Oct 24, 2017 6:10 am
by Sierra Lyricalia » Tue Oct 24, 2017 10:57 am
Horrified at the degradation ofthesewetlands, despite the benefits they offer;
by States of Glory WA Office » Tue Oct 24, 2017 2:20 pm
by Separatist Peoples » Tue Oct 24, 2017 2:30 pm
States of Glory WA Office wrote:Fairburn: Does this proposal permit marriages between wetlands?
by States of Glory WA Office » Tue Oct 24, 2017 2:34 pm
by Fauxia » Tue Oct 24, 2017 4:38 pm
"Wait, I thought they banned them?"
by Separatist Peoples » Thu Nov 02, 2017 11:07 am
by American MapleStory » Sat Nov 04, 2017 9:16 pm
Wolfhawk wrote:oh joy, another committee. Against
by Ransium » Sat Nov 04, 2017 10:05 pm
by Eldrahar » Sat Nov 04, 2017 11:28 pm
by Tarsonis » Sat Nov 04, 2017 11:57 pm
by Dragonslinding WA Mission » Sun Nov 05, 2017 2:51 am
by FreethinkingAnarchists ResidingWherever » Sun Nov 05, 2017 4:56 am
by Sierra Lyricalia » Sun Nov 05, 2017 5:51 am
FreethinkingAnarchists ResidingWherever wrote:...in hopes that a completely private alternative may one day be developed to protect the wetlands...
by Separatist Peoples » Sun Nov 05, 2017 6:22 am
Wolfhawk wrote:oh joy, another committee. Against
American MapleStory wrote:
Another anti-business** committee that's going to be loaded with useless expensive bureaucrats.
AGAINST!
Juzopia wrote:"Keep your hands off my industry. Against."
Tarsonis wrote:Quintus slowly sips a glass of Tarsonian bourbon while reading over the proposal. After a few minutes and a clear floor he activates the podium of his station clearing his theist: "This bill seems to be in order. However, if it pleases the Assembly, could the ambassador from Seperatists Peoples expand on Article 1, sub section C,... specifically on what exactly these mitigation credits are and how they'll positively impact our efforts to preserve these crucial biomes?"
Eldrahar wrote:A few issues with this, like my issues with some real life laws. One, this is basically adding extra costs and taxes. We have enough of those already. While I'm all for protecting the environment, this proposal is far too big on the regulations and requirements. It leaves little room for compromise, and will be a big drain on economies and businesses. As businesses will simply pass along their extra costs to their consumers, this will harm the buying power of consumers. This will hurt economies and. In short, this bill does very little while raising costs astronomically. A horrible idea altogether.
FreethinkingAnarchists ResidingWherever wrote:We respectfully vote against this resolution due to its implications for taxation, and in hopes that a completely private alternative may one day be developed to protect the wetlands for the various benefits laid out in the opening of this proposal.
Sierra Lyricalia wrote:"Not bloody likely." Leo slaps the green FOR button on the desk in front of him, then looks over at the Separatist desk. "Break a leg, sir."
by Queer AnComville » Sun Nov 05, 2017 6:28 am
by Zakuvia » Sun Nov 05, 2017 8:09 am
by Tarsonis » Sun Nov 05, 2017 8:19 am
.Separatist Peoples wrote:Tarsonis wrote:Quintus slowly sips a glass of Tarsonian bourbon while reading over the proposal. After a few minutes and a clear floor he activates the podium of his station clearing his theist: "This bill seems to be in order. However, if it pleases the Assembly, could the ambassador from Seperatists Peoples expand on Article 1, sub section C,... specifically on what exactly these mitigation credits are and how they'll positively impact our efforts to preserve these crucial biomes?"
"You pay money based on the environmental value of the wetland for impacts that are unavoidable. That money goes back to WAMMO to fund it. This serves as an economic incentive to use less invasive methods while also funding conservation efforts."
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement