Coroscent wrote:Mundiferrum wrote:
Mr. Ambassador from Sween, sir, (Gravey says, having by the skilled hands of the medical gnomes recovered from his head wound)if you have such an opinion of the WA, I suggest you, well, get your butt out of here. That's pretty much the point of the WA there, and if you choose to veto all, or hell even just some of its resolutions, well then you're not really complying with it, which is a big no-no in these walls. And Mr. Ambassador from Coroscent, sir, just because someone does not denounce something, does not mean he or she is for it. Sween here is not necessarily being a pedophiliac. If you are to be so black-and-white in your treatment of such things, I suggest you get out of politics in general, since a huge chunk of politics is all about finding grey areas.
Now please, both of you, do stop all this shoutey nonsense - my head still hurts. Och! Damn Flutians (He mutters to himself as he exits and heads for the bar)
Mr Ambassador, I'd just like to ask you if you think it's alright for young, innocent children to be abused? Is it okay for the abusers to get away with such things? Well no it isn't. Anyone who supports child abuse is, in the eyes of the majority of this council, a pedophile, or at least a supporter of pedophilia. And if you're going to suggest I leave politics, I think perhaps look at yourself! What gives you the right to demand anyone leave this council? And before you say that I have demanded Sween leave the WA, no that was a suggestion, not an order. An I'm sure the council's majority will stand and agree with me.
It's not abuse if it's consensual. we don't allow child rape.
