Advertisement
by Improving Wordiness » Thu Mar 27, 2014 10:12 pm
Klaus Devestatorie wrote:I'm a massive tool. ;)
by Crazy girl » Fri Mar 28, 2014 5:36 am
by SkyDip » Fri Mar 28, 2014 6:44 am
Improving Wordiness wrote:Should a nation that has in the past burned regions be commended?
Gordano and Lysandus wrote:SkyDip's actions have, ultimately, destroyed the World Assembly.
Eist wrote:Yea... If you are just going to casually dismiss SkyDip's advice, you are probably not going to get very far at all.
Sedgistan wrote:SkyDip is trying to help, and is giving sound advice. I'd suggestion listening to him, as he has experience of writing (and advising others with) legal proposals.
Frisbeeteria wrote:What Skydip said. This bitchfest is an embarrassment to the Security Council.
by Mallorea and Riva » Fri Mar 28, 2014 7:21 am
Improving Wordiness wrote:I would be interested to hear more of his raid involvement...though it was a very long time ago it still would influence my voting for a commend. Farkers used to attack all and sundry I believe....raider regions included.
Should a nation that has in the past burned regions be commended?
by Venico » Fri Mar 28, 2014 7:56 am
Crazy girl wrote:Hmm, he also used to make nicce flags for people. I know he made a few for me.
by Eist » Fri Mar 28, 2014 8:55 am
Mallorea and Riva wrote:Improving Wordiness wrote:I would be interested to hear more of his raid involvement...though it was a very long time ago it still would influence my voting for a commend. Farkers used to attack all and sundry I believe....raider regions included.
Should a nation that has in the past burned regions be commended?
*coughs loudly and obnoxiously*
Unibot III wrote:Frankly, the lows that people sink to in this game is perhaps the most disturbing thing about NationStates Gameplay.
by Mallorea and Riva » Fri Mar 28, 2014 8:57 am
by Mallorea and Riva » Fri Mar 28, 2014 9:01 am
Eist wrote:Yea, I have no idea what you are talking about.
by Eist » Fri Mar 28, 2014 9:07 am
Unibot III wrote:Frankly, the lows that people sink to in this game is perhaps the most disturbing thing about NationStates Gameplay.
by Mallorea and Riva » Fri Mar 28, 2014 9:11 am
Eist wrote::lol: I thought you were referring to Osiris where Kain ranted for 3 months straight how XKI were going to burn it into the ground after XKI foiled his little plan to do the same thing. Of course, as any rational person would have known from the outset, XKI left as soon as the region was secured. However, some of the Greatest Minds in NS still to this day berate XKI for their involvement. It's hilarious.
You're right though. However, XKI has, of course, only captured regions that meet two criteria: that the regions are a threat to the international community and those regions have specifically declared war on XKI.
That is obviously not the case with 1 Infinite Loop.
by Improving Wordiness » Fri Mar 28, 2014 6:28 pm
Klaus Devestatorie wrote:I'm a massive tool. ;)
by Ramaeus » Fri Mar 28, 2014 7:02 pm
Improving Wordiness wrote:Exactly the point Mall
I would like more information on his involvement with the farkers. For all I know he was a waterboy......or the commander that ordered multiple regions burned and now that the natives are no longer around to speak up.
by Omigodtheykilledkenny » Sat Mar 29, 2014 2:55 pm
by Ramaeus » Sat Mar 29, 2014 4:06 pm
Omigodtheykilledkenny wrote:I assume when you say "protected the fragile Pacific in its infancy," you mean TEP's status as a Pacific region, not the Pacific? You might need to clarify if that's the case.
by Port blood » Mon Mar 31, 2014 12:34 am
Venico wrote:May just be me but this seems very much like a single region Commend. Why does the international community care that he contributed to TEP? What has he done that we care about?
by The Bruce » Mon Mar 31, 2014 4:28 am
Improving Wordiness wrote:I would be interested to hear more of his raid involvement...though it was a very long time ago it still would influence my voting for a commend. Farkers used to attack all and sundry I believe....raider regions included.
Should a nation that has in the past burned regions be commended?
by Blackbird » Mon Mar 31, 2014 9:22 am
Ramaeus wrote:Ananke II wrote:Haven't really made up my mind on whether I'd support a commendation of Loop, but in the early years he was a pretty big part of gameplay. He was one of the Farkers, a senator at the Meritocracy (don't know how involved he was there though) and his early support of the NPO definitely had consequences for interregional gameplay politics. He also ran a very successful flag thread.
I was not aware of Loop's involvement in the Meritocracy. Thank you for the information, I'll be sure to investigate it thoroughly.
by Ramaeus » Mon Mar 31, 2014 2:31 pm
Blackbird wrote:Was Loop involved much in the New Meritocracy? I don't think he did much past the early Charter? Certainly not the Accords? My memory is very hazy on this. I would recommend speaking to the Proconsul from Argyres or any of the other really old Senators about that.
by Cerlon » Mon Mar 31, 2014 4:16 pm
by Unibot III » Wed Apr 09, 2014 6:19 am
[violet] wrote:I mean this in the best possible way,
but Unibot is not a typical NS player.
Milograd wrote:You're a caring, resolute lunatic
with the best of intentions.
by Mallorea and Riva » Wed Apr 09, 2014 6:20 am
Unibot III wrote:Loop's a great guy but using him as a standard is a bit difficult - he took TEP by force and punted a lot of people out for weeks till he had control and then as it was he held on to it for years till it was wholly inactive (as Kenny notes).
Another thing that is problematic is according to Mammo, pretty down low, Loop considered his rule to be Farker rule alongside Mammo's coup in TNP and Franco's revolution in TP (both Farkers). He's a great guy, but there's a lot of themes present here that we need to reconsider like authoritarianism, inactivity, griefing, colonialism.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement