What odd names. Carry on.
Advertisement
by Defwa » Sun Mar 09, 2014 2:56 pm
by The Eternal Kawaii » Sun Mar 09, 2014 6:04 pm
by Vuuhn » Sun Mar 09, 2014 6:09 pm
by Vuuhn » Sun Mar 09, 2014 6:25 pm
by Draica » Sun Mar 09, 2014 6:36 pm
Vuuhn wrote:I like it. Could you repeal Reproductive Freedoms, too?
by Chester Pearson » Sun Mar 09, 2014 6:37 pm
Separatist Peoples wrote:With a lawnchair and a large bag of popcorn in hand, Ambassador SaDiablo walks in and sets himself up comfortably. Out of a dufflebag comes a large foam finger with the name "Chester Pearson" emblazoned on it, as well as a few six-packs.
by Vuuhn » Sun Mar 09, 2014 6:38 pm
by Draica » Sun Mar 09, 2014 6:39 pm
by Defwa » Sun Mar 09, 2014 6:57 pm
by Vuuhn » Sun Mar 09, 2014 7:08 pm
by Chester Pearson » Sun Mar 09, 2014 10:09 pm
Separatist Peoples wrote:With a lawnchair and a large bag of popcorn in hand, Ambassador SaDiablo walks in and sets himself up comfortably. Out of a dufflebag comes a large foam finger with the name "Chester Pearson" emblazoned on it, as well as a few six-packs.
by Separatist Peoples » Mon Mar 10, 2014 7:14 am
by Omigodtheykilledkenny » Wed Mar 12, 2014 7:19 pm
Defwa wrote:Omigodtheykilledkenny wrote:And all already covered under Patients Rights Act. Besides, clause 5 is one of the reasons this is being repealed -- you cannot allow a woman to die just because you're a doctor and have a moral objection to abortion. This is not Saudi Arabia.
What's a saudi arabia?
by Nigerian Kenya » Fri Mar 14, 2014 9:16 am
by Mousebumples » Fri Mar 14, 2014 9:21 am
Nigerian Kenya wrote:And the repeal is off to a bad start. Too early to call, but so far, so good.
Remember: We need to keep this if we want to keep any chance of ever getting 'Reproductive Freedoms' repealed.
by Defwa » Fri Mar 14, 2014 9:22 am
Mousebumples wrote:Nigerian Kenya wrote:And the repeal is off to a bad start. Too early to call, but so far, so good.
Remember: We need to keep this if we want to keep any chance of ever getting 'Reproductive Freedoms' repealed.
Or, we need to keep this - and Reproductive Freedoms - to ensure that women across NationStates have the right to take care of their own reproductive matters as they see fit.
by Molsonian Republics » Fri Mar 14, 2014 9:24 am
OOCRepublican Party (US), Catholicism, United States, democracy, Pro-life Movement, capitalism, gun rights, Putin's domestic policy.Abortion, gay "marriage", liberalism, Barack Obama, racism, Democratic Party, communism, socialism, Obamacare, secularism, non-Christians, Putin's foreign policy.Rob Astorino for NY Governor"The politically correct crowd is tolerant of all viewpoints, except those they disagree with." - Bobby Jindal
"Where there is no Jesus, evil always reigns." - Phil Robertson
IC
My nations wiki page
Embassy Program
Proud Member of the INTERNATIONAL FREEDOM ALLIANCE!
Proud Member of the Right Wing Christian Liberty Alliance!
IATA Member
by Brilliant Equestria » Fri Mar 14, 2014 9:30 am
Molsonian Republics wrote:Why is anyone voting against this, "Reproductive Freedoms" does everything that "On Abortion" does and more, deeming "On Abortion" unnecessary.InfanticideAbortion will still be legal even after this passes. I'd recommend that everyone actually read the resolution before making a decision.
by Zarkanians » Fri Mar 14, 2014 10:19 am
Molsonian Republics wrote:Why is anyone voting against this, "Reproductive Freedoms" does everything that "On Abortion" does and more, deeming "On Abortion" unnecessary.InfanticideAbortion will still be legal even after this passes. I'd recommend that everyone actually read the resolution before making a decision.
by Sierra Lyricalia » Fri Mar 14, 2014 10:26 am
Brilliant Equestria wrote:Yes, as the argument in the resolution says. It's almost as if most people aren't foolish enough to believe that's the reason it's being repealed, though. Curious.
by The United American Social Republic » Fri Mar 14, 2014 11:06 am
by Friday Freshman » Fri Mar 14, 2014 11:09 am
The United American Social Republic wrote:I'm new to this whole World Assembly thing, so I'm not 100% sure what the rules are, but it seems to me that this law doesn't need a full repeal for the reasons you listed, but rather a proposition to have some of the minor details of the document changed some more. The thing about surgeons though was just you being pedantic
by The United American Social Republic » Fri Mar 14, 2014 11:13 am
Friday Freshman wrote:The United American Social Republic wrote:I'm new to this whole World Assembly thing, so I'm not 100% sure what the rules are, but it seems to me that this law doesn't need a full repeal for the reasons you listed, but rather a proposition to have some of the minor details of the document changed some more. The thing about surgeons though was just you being pedantic
You can't make minor changes. Repeal or leave it alone.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement