Unibot III wrote:I would be more interested in this resolution, if Mousebumples wasn't a member of AO and didn't get caught in those leaks from AO that showed her dissing a lot of players and didn't play a role in organizing campaigns to disrupt the WA Votes of regions (e.g., Texas, 10000 Islands, Osiris.. and, just speculating, Europeia).
But nonetheless, if you're going to commend Mousebumples, you should probably note her contributions to her school of thought: NatSov. She wrote a few guides regarding NatSov and has always been a fierce proponent of it (to the point where I think she regularly abused her position as a mentor, but I digress).
She also helped run a (fairly-biased-towards-NatSov) tutorial on the GA in Europeia, which was organized by Sky-Dip (?).
This is nothing more than hyperbolic fearmongering and blatant character assassination. The whole "disrupting WA votes" is the cherry on top for me, because that's incredibly misleading and comically hypocritical. If by disrupting votes you means she might try to persuade larger regions to vote for her proposals then that's something I've regularly seen you do, and is not unusual among WA authors. A campaign is a campaign, it's not organized propaganda like you're making it out to be. If you're implying something more sinister, then you're just misguided.
Also, I'm not sure why her NatSov leaning opinions are grounds for opposing a commendation?
Just to clarify, I'm fully behind the idea of conducting Mousebumples. If anyone deserves it, it's her.