Advertisement
by F1-Insanity » Wed Nov 25, 2009 12:44 pm
by Jedi-Gangsters » Wed Nov 25, 2009 12:45 pm
Lucky Number wrote:The government of Lucky Number would like to protest against the malicious slander spouted by Jedi-Gangsters on this thread. Lucky Number has always upholded the right of every nation and region to self-determination and therefore resents the interference of Equinox, a known imperialist region, in affairs that only concern the region of Democratia. Furthermore, Lucky Number is deeply troubled by the discriminatory attitude of J-G. LN government policies should not be of any concern to uninvolved nations.
by Kalibarr » Wed Nov 25, 2009 12:47 pm
Cinistra wrote:Jedi-Gangsters wrote:Resurrect a dead horse? Who knows. What I do I want is to Liberate Democratia. If you truly believe that Democratia was dying then at least give the region some respect and let it do so on its own. So, do you support the actions of The Axis of Evil, and the attempt to keep regions as trophies?
Trophy-keeping? That surely isn't against the instincts of defenders, as far as I have observed.
by Lucky Number » Wed Nov 25, 2009 12:49 pm
The Nuclear Robatics wrote:I find this proposal to be a complete waste of time. I find that the Axis had the right to capture this region and use it for whatever purpose the Axis decides. If the natives of the region don't like it well tough, that is life.
by The Nuclear Robatics » Wed Nov 25, 2009 12:50 pm
Lucky Number wrote:The Nuclear Robatics wrote:I find this proposal to be a complete waste of time. I find that the Axis had the right to capture this region and use it for whatever purpose the Axis decides. If the natives of the region don't like it well tough, that is life.
As can be seen by the practically unanimous support of our delegate by the natives of Democratia, the password protection is desired by the local populace. Besides that, if Democratia wishes to be allied or affiliated to other regions it is a matter that should be of no concern to foreign nations.
by F1-Insanity » Wed Nov 25, 2009 12:51 pm
by Jedi-Gangsters » Wed Nov 25, 2009 12:51 pm
by Elktown » Wed Nov 25, 2009 12:52 pm
by Jedi-Gangsters » Wed Nov 25, 2009 12:53 pm
As can be seen by the practically unanimous support of our delegate by the natives of Democratia, the password protection is desired by the local populace. Besides that, if Democratia wishes to be allied or affiliated to other regions it is a matter that should be of no concern to foreign nations.
by The Nuclear Robatics » Wed Nov 25, 2009 12:54 pm
Elktown wrote:Vote AGAINST this. Any nation has the right to invade a region. It is simply part of game rules. It this region could not defend itself. It is not deserving.
by The Rich Port » Wed Nov 25, 2009 12:56 pm
by Manfigurut » Wed Nov 25, 2009 12:56 pm
by Mutated Skeleton Lords » Wed Nov 25, 2009 12:59 pm
by Jedi-Gangsters » Wed Nov 25, 2009 12:59 pm
Manfigurut wrote:For a long time I was the delegate my region and had to use password-protection to prevent undesireable nations from entering our region. We have since refounded it, but I think that the option of liberating a region can be very easily abused by invaders or so-called defenders to impose their rule on others. Therefore I tend to oppose all Security Council resolutions, via my WA nation.
by Leach Islands » Wed Nov 25, 2009 1:00 pm
Shebu wrote:
History is written by winners. French History books are blank from cover to cover.
by The Rich Port » Wed Nov 25, 2009 1:04 pm
Manfigurut wrote:For a long time I was the delegate my region and had to use password-protection to prevent undesireable nations from entering our region. We have since refounded it, but I think that the option of liberating a region can be very easily abused by invaders or so-called defenders to impose their rule on others. Therefore I tend to oppose all Security Council resolutions, via my WA nation.
by The Rich Port » Wed Nov 25, 2009 1:06 pm
Leach Islands wrote:We at leach islands do not condemn the actions by the axis of evil, nor do we vote in favor of the Liberation. If a region is not prepared to defend itself, whether through allies or by it's own means then the inevitable will happen. They will be invaded.
by Jedi-Gangsters » Wed Nov 25, 2009 1:07 pm
by Mikeswill » Wed Nov 25, 2009 1:07 pm
by The Rich Port » Wed Nov 25, 2009 1:11 pm
Jedi-Gangsters wrote:I do not wish to impose my rule, but that is what The Axis of Evil is doing in Democratia.
by Leach Islands » Wed Nov 25, 2009 1:12 pm
The Rich Port wrote:Leach Islands wrote:We at leach islands do not condemn the actions by the axis of evil, nor do we vote in favor of the Liberation. If a region is not prepared to defend itself, whether through allies or by it's own means then the inevitable will happen. They will be invaded.
Those who have no reason to take up arms need not do so. They are harmless and defenseless. It is up to the WA to defend such people, or at least to prevent transgressions that would impair international peace and strain relations. And by your argument, The Axis of Evil is once again presented as dangerous. Therefore, they are delegates for regulation/curtailing, even by the WA
Shebu wrote:
History is written by winners. French History books are blank from cover to cover.
by Jedi-Gangsters » Wed Nov 25, 2009 1:15 pm
Nations should not have to rely on organisations such as the WA to bail them out of the trouble that they have caused themselves.
by The Nuclear Robatics » Wed Nov 25, 2009 1:15 pm
Jedi-Gangsters wrote:I do not wish to impose my rule, but that is what The Axis of Evil is doing in Democratia.
by Cromwell Protectorate » Wed Nov 25, 2009 1:15 pm
by Manfigurut » Wed Nov 25, 2009 1:16 pm
The Rich Port wrote:Manfigurut wrote:For a long time I was the delegate my region and had to use password-protection to prevent undesireable nations from entering our region. We have since refounded it, but I think that the option of liberating a region can be very easily abused by invaders or so-called defenders to impose their rule on others. Therefore I tend to oppose all Security Council resolutions, via my WA nation.
You've not heard of the word "investigation" or the phrase "fact-checking" before? Irrelevant. For example, I just checked up on your region to see whether you were not a raider in disguise, or whether you have committed past abuses. You haven't. Simple as that. You'd convince me otherwise if there were another reason, however.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement