There's a reason it's a Cultural Heritage resolution. Language is a cultural heritage, and language also facilitates communication, the very thing that we're using to know what the other is talking about.Iron Confederation wrote:But is it the role of the World Assembly to preserve language? I don't believe it is.
While some nations are more than happy to let whole cultures and languages die, does not the international community have a duty to preserve it, or at the very least, help to understand them? At the very least, it prods some of the more irresponsible nations into doing something for the betterment of the understanding of those who live within their border, instead of letting that cultural diversity die, or letting any and all misconceptions stay. For those seeking to better understand other nations' language and culture, the particular resolution that this repeal seeks to pull out of the books, makes it easier for information to be compiled and researched. It is an international issue, and we're not quite sure why making things easy to find and study is a Bad ThingTM.
Or does the delegate of Iron Confederation have a better theory for what should fit into a Cultural Heritage resolution?