It's a loophole for you. You don't have to teach science classes, just have science in some way or form (info desk maybe?) in the school.
Advertisement
by Araraukar » Mon Aug 05, 2013 7:49 am
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by Glen-Rhodes » Mon Aug 05, 2013 11:19 am
by Araraukar » Mon Aug 05, 2013 11:43 am
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by Glen-Rhodes » Mon Aug 05, 2013 1:47 pm
by Auralia » Mon Aug 05, 2013 2:35 pm
by Discoveria » Mon Aug 05, 2013 2:52 pm
by Ardchoille » Tue Aug 06, 2013 6:56 am
Discoveria wrote:... The target resolution implies that it is merely concerned with schools as opposed to higher education ...
by Glen-Rhodes » Tue Aug 06, 2013 10:45 am
by Sanctaria » Tue Aug 06, 2013 10:49 am
Glen-Rhodes wrote:You don't typically talk about "governmental aid" when it comes to primary and secondary education.
Glen-Rhodes wrote:I think more people would understand it to cover post-secondary schools than think it's limited to primary schools.
by Glen-Rhodes » Tue Aug 06, 2013 11:23 am
Sanctaria wrote:Glen-Rhodes wrote:You don't typically talk about "governmental aid" when it comes to primary and secondary education.Glen-Rhodes wrote:I think more people would understand it to cover post-secondary schools than think it's limited to primary schools.
((OOC: Except being in Ireland, I, like Ard, would understand the word school to mean every up until secondary education, not after it. And the majority of primary and secondary schooling here, and again in most places Ard mentioned, would be government funded and as such fall under the "government aid" umbrella. I think what she brings up is very valid.))
by The Eternal Kawaii » Tue Aug 06, 2013 4:57 pm
Saveyou Island wrote:Strongly opposed. Science is a fundamental school subject, and it is a subject that will be applied in the real world, therefore students should be able to understand it:and religion should not be used as a reason to oppose such a fine piece of legislation.
by Ardchoille » Tue Aug 06, 2013 6:36 pm
Righto, I've provided non-NS evidence that the current text can be problematic for players, including repeal supporters, who don't speak US-based English. That was a courtesy to a player who may have overlooked a significant practical issue, and Auralia will make what use of it he chooses. Author intent and text interpretation are GA political questions. Mod awaaaaay! *flies*players' NS-political opinions wrote:.... (whatever) ...
by Auralia » Wed Aug 07, 2013 2:54 am
Recognizing that the term "school" includes institutions of higher learning,
by Legendardisch » Wed Aug 07, 2013 3:09 am
The United Federation of Legendardisch
Pegasus Armed Dealership | De Volkscourant | Embassy Program | Factbook | Legendardisch.gov
PROUD MEMBER OF: I.S.A , I.C.O.N , V.N.T , U.P.A , I.F.C , I.E.S.P , I.A.T.A , I.C.D , D.S.A , U.T.A
Some very cool links: Flickr | DeviantART | Personal Website
Nederlander | Je Suis Charlie | PEGIDA
by Auralia » Wed Aug 07, 2013 3:13 am
Legendardisch wrote:We strongly oppose.
Our Education System has outlawed religious schools a long time ago due to the fact that basic mathemetics, basic biology, and anything else in this area was not taught.
now children, teens and young adults learn what science does,
WE oppose this law.
by Legendardisch » Wed Aug 07, 2013 3:18 am
The United Federation of Legendardisch
Pegasus Armed Dealership | De Volkscourant | Embassy Program | Factbook | Legendardisch.gov
PROUD MEMBER OF: I.S.A , I.C.O.N , V.N.T , U.P.A , I.F.C , I.E.S.P , I.A.T.A , I.C.D , D.S.A , U.T.A
Some very cool links: Flickr | DeviantART | Personal Website
Nederlander | Je Suis Charlie | PEGIDA
by Retired WerePenguins » Wed Aug 07, 2013 5:23 am
Ardchoille wrote:As an Australian-English speaker, I was totally puzzled when I first saw this proposal.
by Bears Armed » Wed Aug 07, 2013 10:24 am
Lillitania wrote:Because, for instance, if a child is taught basic mathematics it doesn't prepare them for the outside world, they must continue taking classes in mathematics to further their education.
by Araraukar » Wed Aug 07, 2013 12:07 pm
Bears Armed wrote:[for example] a musical academy, a law school, or a stage school... and why should those specialised educational establishments have to include sciences in their curriculums?
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by Reichsland » Wed Aug 07, 2013 12:39 pm
by Dellin » Wed Aug 07, 2013 12:46 pm
by Glen-Rhodes » Wed Aug 07, 2013 12:47 pm
Araraukar wrote:Bears Armed wrote:[for example] a musical academy, a law school, or a stage school... and why should those specialised educational establishments have to include sciences in their curriculums?
Because science isn't just "hard sciences" like math, physics, chemistry and biology. It's an all-encompassing concept of the world around us. History is a science, psychology is a science, even music and other forms of art have scientific elements.
by Dellin » Wed Aug 07, 2013 12:49 pm
Glen-Rhodes wrote:Araraukar wrote:Because science isn't just "hard sciences" like math, physics, chemistry and biology. It's an all-encompassing concept of the world around us. History is a science, psychology is a science, even music and other forms of art have scientific elements.
The resolution is clearly about hard sciences. It specifically names the theories of gravity and evolution.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement