Advertisement
by Ajax Prime » Mon Nov 02, 2009 6:46 pm
by Grays Harbor » Tue Nov 03, 2009 12:42 am
Ajax Prime wrote:Ajax Prime would be against this.
by The Magic Spirit » Wed Nov 04, 2009 3:19 am
by Tsukasa-chan » Wed Nov 04, 2009 6:31 am
by Philimbesi » Wed Nov 04, 2009 6:38 am
by Flibbleites » Wed Nov 04, 2009 8:48 am
The Magic Spirit wrote:The Magic Spirit fully supports the repeal of this act based on the problems mentioned. Please draft a replacement act to convince delegates to pass this and fix those issues.
by Omigodtheykilledkenny » Wed Nov 04, 2009 11:10 am
Grays Harbor wrote:We have not felt the full effects of this in my country as yet, as Parliament voted out an Act of Defiance, signed by the King, which prohibits compliance with this resolution.
by Murray the Evil Skull » Wed Nov 04, 2009 12:55 pm
Omigodtheykilledkenny wrote:Grays Harbor wrote:We have not felt the full effects of this in my country as yet, as Parliament voted out an Act of Defiance, signed by the King, which prohibits compliance with this resolution.
That's interesting; I had no idea member states could simply defy a resolution like that.
by Grays Harbor » Wed Nov 04, 2009 1:35 pm
Omigodtheykilledkenny wrote:Grays Harbor wrote:We have not felt the full effects of this in my country as yet, as Parliament voted out an Act of Defiance, signed by the King, which prohibits compliance with this resolution.
That's interesting; I had no idea member states could simply defy a resolution like that.
by Omigodtheykilledkenny » Wed Nov 04, 2009 1:57 pm
by Philimbesi » Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:02 pm
by Grays Harbor » Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:16 pm
Omigodtheykilledkenny wrote:Ignoring resolutions is Godmoding. The best you can do is loophole-wank, puppet-wank or resign.
by Flibbleites » Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:50 pm
Philimbesi wrote:Actually this one takes very little imagination as well, our Parks Department has built a list for Presidential review and recommendation and it's currently on Bartlet's desk... somewhere... possibly a drawer... or under his coffee mug... he'll get to it.
by Grays Harbor » Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:57 pm
Flibbleites wrote:Philimbesi wrote:Actually this one takes very little imagination as well, our Parks Department has built a list for Presidential review and recommendation and it's currently on Bartlet's desk... somewhere... possibly a drawer... or under his coffee mug... he'll get to it.
Yeah, getting around this one is not exactly rocket science, we've just officially stripped any historical monuments of historical status. That's not to say that we're not keeping them protected mind you, it's just not officially being done.
Bob Flibble
WA Representative
by The Altani Federation » Wed Nov 04, 2009 3:57 pm
by Grays Harbor » Wed Nov 04, 2009 4:03 pm
by Tsukasa-chan » Wed Nov 04, 2009 6:55 pm
by The Altani Federation » Wed Nov 04, 2009 8:27 pm
by Grays Harbor » Thu Nov 05, 2009 3:00 am
The Altani Federation wrote:I am honored to receive the Certificate of LOL, Ambassador. It shall go on a special place of honor on my office wall, right next to the plaque certifying that nothing historic ever happened there. Some infamous things have happened there, especially after office parties. But nothing historic.
N.N. etc.
by The Altani Federation » Thu Nov 05, 2009 7:55 am
Grays Harbor wrote:The Altani Federation wrote:I am honored to receive the Certificate of LOL, Ambassador. It shall go on a special place of honor on my office wall, right next to the plaque certifying that nothing historic ever happened there. Some infamous things have happened there, especially after office parties. But nothing historic.
N.N. etc.
We know. Some of ourIntel operatives managed to get pictures from the imagery collection devices planted in your officeEmbassy Staff have heard rumours of such goings on.
*innocently whistles and walks away*
by The Palentine » Fri Nov 06, 2009 2:07 pm
by Noordeinde » Sat Nov 07, 2009 11:03 am
by Picobella » Sat Nov 07, 2009 2:47 pm
by Flibbleites » Sat Nov 07, 2009 3:43 pm
Picobella wrote:Why would we repeal a resolution that is there to protect monuments. Monuments are a part of our history, not as individual nations, but as a species. By repealing this sanction, are we going to allow nations in times of war, to blatantly desecrate our sacred icons, monuments, and memorials? We enacted this resolution to help us remember our past, and now it seems as though we do not even remember why we enacted this resolution. My friends, the delegates of the World Assembly, ask yourselves, would you like your nations monuments blatantly desecrated?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement