Advertisement
by Clearthink » Wed Oct 28, 2009 9:15 pm
by Cameroi » Wed Oct 28, 2009 10:06 pm
by Baranthar » Thu Oct 29, 2009 12:56 am
Philimbesi wrote:I was simply letting this body, many of whom were calling for the action, know that should the item pass we are ready and willing to respond with what they are asking for. Further I did say that I was going to refrain from discussing specifics did I not.
by Funkaholics » Thu Oct 29, 2009 1:33 am
by Philimbesi » Thu Oct 29, 2009 5:39 am
by Flibbleites » Thu Oct 29, 2009 8:41 am
Philimbesi wrote:Presidential Compound
Presidents Office
CJ entered the office "You wanted to see me sir?"
Bartlet looked up "Yes CJ I was looking at the advance copy of my schedule this week."
CJ glanced down knowing what was about to happen "Ah.. yes."
"Is there a possibility that I have a Photo Op with a donkey coming up?" Bartlet asked.
"Ah yes sir it's going to be taken with Bob the official donkey of the USP". She said.
"Bob?"
"Yes"
"The official donkey of the...?" Bartlet said frowning.
"National Parks Service, Yes, sir Bob, he was chosen as the official mascot of the National Parks Service, by a new law that seems destined to pass in the World Assembly asses must be present at all monuments so the NPS selected...
"Ok, well part of my day is going to have a long discussion with the NPS on using tax-payer revenue to hold ass auditions, but CJ" Bartlet said.
"Yes"
"Aren't we worried that a picture of me and a donkey might surface later when I'm running again?" Bartlet asked
"Extremely sir." Cj said.
"International law requires an ass..."
"...to be present at all monuments, not sure why sir but it's a WA thing, Yep." CJ said.
"Well it really doesn't surprise me that the WA requires something having to do with asses but... "
"We can try to put a best face on it.' CJ said.
"The ass? We can spin my standing next to a donkey?" Bartlet said, honestly interested.
"Well, sure, we are dedicating a monument to Bernard Galrin, he was an Olympic runner, so the donkey is there to... to symbolize his great speed. " Cj stammered, obviously making it up as she goes along.
"It's a donkey CJ, not a Thoroughbred!" Bartlet said.
"No not speed, then... he's there to symbolize something that will carry your stuff?"
"CJ"
"Yes?"
"Go away now" Bartlet said.
"Thank you Mr President" She said, backing out of the office.
"Nancy, get Nigel on the phone" Bartlet called.
by Philimbesi » Thu Oct 29, 2009 8:44 am
OOC: Did you have to name the donkey Bob?
by The Magic Spirit » Thu Oct 29, 2009 10:43 pm
Why shouldn't our great nation not use the forts, castles and cannons we have at our disposal just because they're monuments? Our lives are more important than their historical status since they can be repaired, we can't.REQUIRES that Historical Monuments not be attacked, bombed or used as cover, shelter or vantage points by military personnel of attacking or defending countries, unless they are being used as such by the enemy.
Unneccesary. We have buildings that have been in private hands for years. People who care for a building are often willing to put down funds for repair. And we can use every ace we're offered. As long as the owner is a Spirit citizen, we see nothing wrong with private ownership.REQUIRES that the monument be made government property and that it can not be owned by a private party.
by Grays Harbor » Thu Oct 29, 2009 10:48 pm
The Magic Spirit wrote:Why shouldn't our great nation not use the forts, castles and cannons we have at our disposal just because they're monuments? Our lives are more important than their historical status since they can be repaired, we can't.REQUIRES that Historical Monuments not be attacked, bombed or used as cover, shelter or vantage points by military personnel of attacking or defending countries, unless they are being used as such by the enemy.Unneccesary. We have buildings that have been in private hands for years. People who care for a building are often willing to put down funds for repair. And we can use every ace we're offered. As long as the owner is a Spirit citizen, we see nothing wrong with private ownership.REQUIRES that the monument be made government property and that it can not be owned by a private party.
by Scalietti » Thu Oct 29, 2009 11:13 pm
by The Magic Spirit » Fri Oct 30, 2009 3:40 am
by Philimbesi » Fri Oct 30, 2009 4:31 am
The Magic Spirit wrote:What is even more shocking is people voting in favor of a proposal without properly reading what consequences it could have...
by Philimbesi » Fri Oct 30, 2009 4:33 am
Cor-Dem wrote:Someone should draw up a repeal for it then, this violates a Nation's Sovereignty in sooooo many ways.
by Funkaholics » Fri Oct 30, 2009 6:31 am
by La Habana » Fri Oct 30, 2009 10:01 am
by Philimbesi » Fri Oct 30, 2009 10:14 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Fachumonn
Advertisement