Thanks! What's with all the periods, though?
Advertisement
by Newtered States » Mon Oct 22, 2012 9:02 pm
by Andropoland » Tue Oct 23, 2012 1:56 pm
by Euroslavia » Wed Oct 24, 2012 11:28 am
by Kulaloe » Sun Oct 28, 2012 8:59 am
by Newtered States » Sun Oct 28, 2012 1:57 pm
Kulaloe wrote:Samantha lit up a joint as she sat up in her seat. It was strange to her that the gnomes had no issue with her loitering after her nation's withdrawl from the World Assembly.
What the hell? Another Security Council Resolution about the Sedgistanis? First a commend for defending, then a condemn for mass vandalism and being "overly ambitious", then a repeal of the first commendation for raiding and now this? Is Sedgistan the Chuck Norris of nations or something?
by Aksun » Sun Oct 28, 2012 11:29 pm
Def Con
1 2 3 4 5
Standard Rainy Day
How to obtain a capital, leader, or religion - FAQs - Getting Help Request -Leaving the WA -
One Stop Rules Shop - Zombie Defense Coalition - Zombie Defense Coalition Part 2
by Newtered States » Mon Oct 29, 2012 10:41 am
Aksun wrote:I really think we need to repeal resolution 54 and see what the community thinks of that first. Then if it is successful propose a commendation.
Edit: I am just not really all for commendating a mod for being a mod. They have to do something above and beyond like RPing with the community or being active on some type of forum.
by Aksun » Thu Nov 01, 2012 8:48 pm
Def Con
1 2 3 4 5
Standard Rainy Day
How to obtain a capital, leader, or religion - FAQs - Getting Help Request -Leaving the WA -
One Stop Rules Shop - Zombie Defense Coalition - Zombie Defense Coalition Part 2
by G-Tech Corporation » Thu Nov 01, 2012 8:49 pm
by Proletaurus » Wed Nov 07, 2012 12:43 pm
The Crimson Antifa Rogue Sabot-Cat
by Newtered States » Wed Nov 07, 2012 5:33 pm
Proletaurus wrote:I Fully support this Proposal.
Hopefully someone will write soon new Proposal 'Repeal 'Repeal Condemn Sedgistan'. And then...
Actually I do not care less who is subject of this type of Proposals. What is Good in this proposal is it's help Paralyse whole Security Counsil and this is Only valuable Aspect of it because SC is Play Ground for Petty Bureaucrats, slow moving monster for nothing which has some meaning at all.
Whole Commending/Condemning prosedure could be re-designed on basis of 'Thumbs up'/'Thumbs Down', One vote per WA-Nation from Other WA-nation. (+300 Thumbs ups=Commended/-300 Thumbs Down=Condemned. For Example) Nice and simple. Lot more faster and less time consuming.
by Skyrim Diplomacy » Wed Nov 07, 2012 6:59 pm
by Newtered States » Thu Nov 08, 2012 4:10 pm
Skyrim Diplomacy wrote:Do you plan on submitting this again? If not, can we please let this thread die in peace? There's no need to be voicing support for a proposal that was already submitted and failed to achieve quorum.
by Kulaloe » Fri Nov 09, 2012 5:24 pm
Newtered States wrote:Kulaloe wrote:Samantha lit up a joint as she sat up in her seat. It was strange to her that the gnomes had no issue with her loitering after her nation's withdrawl from the World Assembly.
What the hell? Another Security Council Resolution about the Sedgistanis? First a commend for defending, then a condemn for mass vandalism and being "overly ambitious", then a repeal of the first commendation for raiding and now this? Is Sedgistan the Chuck Norris of nations or something?
Nah, just my idol.
by Newtered States » Fri Nov 09, 2012 11:11 pm
Domshire wrote:Please do submit your proposal. It has my approval.
by The Dourian Embassy » Sun Nov 11, 2012 1:37 pm
Crazy girl wrote:If you want this to pass, you really need to add to it.
by Bergnovinaia » Mon Nov 12, 2012 9:39 am
by Typhlochactas » Mon Nov 12, 2012 1:14 pm
by Skyrim Diplomacy » Mon Nov 12, 2012 4:13 pm
by Bergnovinaia » Mon Nov 12, 2012 4:43 pm
Skyrim Diplomacy wrote:Everyone does know this was *already* submitted and failed to achieve quorum, right? Can we just let this one die, please?
by The Dourian Embassy » Mon Nov 12, 2012 4:53 pm
Bergnovinaia wrote:until it fails to reach quorum this time.
by Skyrim Diplomacy » Mon Nov 12, 2012 5:00 pm
Bergnovinaia wrote:Skyrim Diplomacy wrote:Everyone does know this was *already* submitted and failed to achieve quorum, right? Can we just let this one die, please?
OOC: Last time I checked, it was alright to comment on a proposal that is awaiting approval with 25 endorsements. So no, the debate can last until it fails to reach quorum this time.
by Kulaloe » Wed Nov 14, 2012 3:54 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement