[DEFEATED] Commend Sedgistan

by **Newtered States** » Sun Oct 21, 2012 7:07 pm

I've been working on this for awhile. Thoughts? Any rule violations?

Thanks!

Recognizing the contributions made to the Security Council by the nation of Sedgistan

Hereby Commends Sedgistan

by **Tim-Opolis** » Sun Oct 21, 2012 7:28 pm

Could we get some more details on said contributions?

by **Mahaj** » Sun Oct 21, 2012 7:28 pm

Seems about right.

by **Eist** » Sun Oct 21, 2012 7:34 pm

I took a lengthy look -- pored over it for hours, in fact. There doesn't seem to be a single rule violation! Well done.

by **Feux** » Sun Oct 21, 2012 9:30 pm

I support this proposal 100%

by **Skyrim Diplomacy** » Sun Oct 21, 2012 9:36 pm

Looks like this may be illegal under the tit-for-tat rule, if you really stretch the imagination. :lol:

by **Kelvaros Prime** » Sun Oct 21, 2012 10:35 pm

Newtered States wrote:I've been working on this for awhile. Thoughts? Any rule violations?

Thanks!

Recognizing the contributions made to the Security Council by the nation of Sedgistan

Hereby Commends Sedgistan

"And contributions to the world as a moderator in interregional and international affairs."

by **Aksun** » Sun Oct 21, 2012 10:42 pm

SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION # 54

Condemn Sedgistan

A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.

Would we not have to repeal this first before a commendation?

by **Kelvaros Prime** » Sun Oct 21, 2012 10:48 pm

Aksun wrote:SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION # 54

Condemn Sedgistan

A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.

Would we not have to repeal this first before a commendation?

I agree

by **Cromarty** » Sun Oct 21, 2012 11:52 pm

Kelvaros Prime wrote:
Newtered States wrote:I've been working on this for awhile. Thoughts? Any rule violations?

Thanks!

Recognizing the contributions made to the Security Council by the nation of Sedgistan

Hereby Commends Sedgistan

"And contributions to the world as a moderator in interregional and international affairs."

You can't comment a moderator for moderating.

Aksun wrote:SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION # 54

Condemn Sedgistan

A resolution to express shock and dismay at a nation or region.

Would we not have to repeal this first before a commendation?

Nope.

by **Newtered States** » Mon Oct 22, 2012 9:15 am

Skyrim Diplomacy wrote:Looks like this may be illegal under the tit-for-tat rule, if you really stretch the imagination.

Care to expand on that? I do really think that he deserves a commendation.

by **Skyrim Diplomacy** » Mon Oct 22, 2012 9:33 am

Newtered States wrote:
Skyrim Diplomacy wrote:Looks like this may be illegal under the tit-for-tat rule, if you really stretch the imagination.

Care to expand on that? I do really think that he deserves a commendation.

Don't mind it-it's not tit-for-tat by any stretch of the imagination, though for your future reference, tit-for-tat is explained here.

by **G-Tech Corporation** » Mon Oct 22, 2012 9:39 am

Damn forum destroyer doesn't deserve a commendation.

I'm not holding a grudge, but he doesn't necessarily hit commendation status imho. Despite his work as a Mod (which he can't be commended for anyway) and in the SC, his contributions are matched and exceeded by other unrecognized nations. My two cents.

by **Newtered States** » Mon Oct 22, 2012 10:19 am

G-Tech Corporation wrote:Damn forum destroyer doesn't deserve a commendation.

I'm not holding a grudge, but he doesn't necessarily hit commendation status imho. Despite his work as a Mod (which he can't be commended for anyway) and in the SC, his contributions are matched and exceeded by other unrecognized nations. My two cents.

I've attacked forums before. What's wrong with that?

by **Skyrim Diplomacy** » Mon Oct 22, 2012 10:35 am

Newtered States wrote:I've attacked forums before. What's wrong with that?

But (to my knowledge) you haven't turned TRR's forums...pink. *shudders*

by **Lazzarania** » Mon Oct 22, 2012 12:14 pm

If anyone deserves to be commended it's Sedgistan. I fully support this.

by **Newtered States** » Mon Oct 22, 2012 3:28 pm

Lazzarania wrote:If anyone deserves to be commended it's Sedgistan. I fully support this.

Thanks for your support, I couldn't agree more.

by **Ambroscus Koth** » Mon Oct 22, 2012 6:30 pm

I dunno, I think it could use a bit of workshopping before it's really up to SC standards.

by **Milograd** » Mon Oct 22, 2012 7:05 pm

Newtered States wrote:I've been working on this for awhile. Thoughts? Any rule violations?

Thanks!

Recognizing the contributions made to the Security Council by the nation of Sedgistan

Hereby Commends Sedgistan

I'll refrain from commenting on the legality of your proposal because I'm not a moderator, but in terms of substance it is very weak. Explaining the effects of Sedgistan's contributions to the SC and citing examples of those contributions would definitely help your cause. You might want to consider reading over passed resolutions so that you can observe examples of how polished resolutions should look. You're going to need to be more specific if you are serious about passing this proposal.

by **Skyrim Diplomacy** » Mon Oct 22, 2012 7:49 pm

Milograd wrote:You're going to need to be more specific if you are serious about passing this proposal.

About that....

by **Milograd** » Mon Oct 22, 2012 7:56 pm

Skyrim Diplomacy wrote:
Milograd wrote:You're going to need to be more specific if you are serious about passing this proposal.

About that....

He has not indicated that this proposal has been created as a joke, so I am not going to assume that it is one. To do otherwise would be to potentially belittle an inexperienced author's sincere attempts to get involved with the SC, and personally I don't approve of that.

by **Newtered States** » Mon Oct 22, 2012 8:04 pm

Milograd wrote:
Skyrim Diplomacy wrote:About that....

He has not indicated that this proposal has been created as a joke, so I am not going to assume that it is one. To do otherwise would be to potentially belittle an inexperienced author's sincere attempts to get involved with the SC, and personally I don't approve of that.

Of course this is serious. To bring a joke proposal before the SC would belittle its importance, and make it a laughingstock of a legislative body.

by **Skyrim Diplomacy** » Mon Oct 22, 2012 8:06 pm

Newtered States wrote:Of course this is serious. To bring a joke proposal before the SC would belittle its importance, and make it a laughingstock of a legislative body.

Doesn't sound like the prominent author you are at all.

by **Newtered States** » Mon Oct 22, 2012 8:21 pm

Skyrim Diplomacy wrote:
Newtered States wrote:Of course this is serious. To bring a joke proposal before the SC would belittle its importance, and make it a laughingstock of a legislative body.

Doesn't sound like the prominent author you are at all.

I'm unsure of the meaning behind your message, but I appreciate the support in my proposal everyone. I will be submitting it when I get a second endorsement.

by **Feux** » Mon Oct 22, 2012 8:59 pm

Newtered States wrote:
Skyrim Diplomacy wrote:Doesn't sound like the prominent author you are at all.

I'm unsure of the meaning behind your message, but I appreciate the support in my proposal everyone. I will be submitting it when I get a second endorsement.

........Good luck with your proposal.

[DEFEATED] Commend Sedgistan

[DEFEATED] Commend Sedgistan

Who is online