by Ubeki beki beki beki stan stan » Fri Sep 14, 2012 8:29 pm
by Skyrim Diplomacy » Fri Sep 14, 2012 9:54 pm
by Ubeki beki beki beki stan stan » Fri Sep 14, 2012 9:58 pm
Skyrim Diplomacy wrote:Why do you insist on putting proposals here for editing after submission to the WA?
by Skyrim Diplomacy » Fri Sep 14, 2012 10:03 pm
Ubeki beki beki beki stan stan wrote:Well, it was up for a good hour or so before I submitted it. I took into account what was said in the last thread and made edits. If there are more needed, I can do them on another draft.
by Ubeki beki beki beki stan stan » Fri Sep 14, 2012 10:05 pm
Skyrim Diplomacy wrote:Ubeki beki beki beki stan stan wrote:Well, it was up for a good hour or so before I submitted it. I took into account what was said in the last thread and made edits. If there are more needed, I can do them on another draft.
An hour? You should leave drafts up for a few days before submitting them. Furthermore, as I stated in your previous draft, this is a case of you feeding the troll. This nation has not committed any international crimes worthy of the attention of the Security Council.
by Skyrim Diplomacy » Fri Sep 14, 2012 10:12 pm
Ubeki beki beki beki stan stan wrote:Honestly, the people whose input I wanted on this draft I communicated with via telegram. Opinions from others are appreciated but I don't feel they're necessary in the writing process.
If that's the case, the condemnation won't pass. And I could accept that. But I want to give it the best possible shot at succeeding.
by Ubeki beki beki beki stan stan » Fri Sep 14, 2012 10:14 pm
Skyrim Diplomacy wrote:Ubeki beki beki beki stan stan wrote:Honestly, the people whose input I wanted on this draft I communicated with via telegram. Opinions from others are appreciated but I don't feel they're necessary in the writing process.
If that's the case, the condemnation won't pass. And I could accept that. But I want to give it the best possible shot at succeeding.
Which would include accepting help and criticisms from the SC regulars who have passed legislation before.
by Frisbeeteria » Fri Sep 14, 2012 11:08 pm
Ubeki beki beki beki stan stan wrote:Sure, like I said, I welcome your opinion.
by Ubeki beki beki beki stan stan » Sat Sep 15, 2012 12:23 pm
Frisbeeteria wrote:Ubeki beki beki beki stan stan wrote:Sure, like I said, I welcome your opinion.
Skyrim Diplomacy is not the only NS player interested in the SC. Plus, Saturday night is probably the slowest time to get any response at all, so a one hour lead time is effectively meaningless. Typically players debate for a week or so before submitting. It's not a rule, just a general practice.
That said, submitting without review means you're subject to illegal proposals being mod deleted. Three of those and you get kicked from the WA. That one IS a rule.
by Icesun » Sat Sep 15, 2012 5:29 pm
by Ubeki beki beki beki stan stan » Sat Sep 15, 2012 5:50 pm
Icesun wrote:Just as a point of interest to me (and I'm going to sound like such a newbie) but how is a condemning actually going to teach this player their lesson?
by The Great Destruction » Sun Sep 16, 2012 11:13 am
Weed wrote:I assure you, a nation with Newt Gingrich as a flag has a bad image on NationStates already. This is an ultra-liberal site.
I'll vote against this.
by Delegate Vinage » Mon Sep 17, 2012 1:44 am
REMEMBERING how the nation of Newtered States was also responsible for the Imperial Democratic Empire ceasing to exist, and participated in a raid of Warzone Europe,
by Ubeki beki beki beki stan stan » Mon Sep 17, 2012 8:41 am
Delegate Vinage wrote:Any evidence to back up the accusations here made towards the nominee for the badge?REMEMBERING how the nation of Newtered States was also responsible for the Imperial Democratic Empire ceasing to exist, and participated in a raid of Warzone Europe,
Damn him! Such an evil individual for performing a single raid.
Anyway, seriously, going to need some really convincing evidence to persuade me to give the troll a badge
by Delegate Vinage » Mon Sep 17, 2012 12:50 pm
by Ubeki beki beki beki stan stan » Mon Sep 17, 2012 1:59 pm
Delegate Vinage wrote:Vinage gasped, "You want me to do the research for your proposal? Well I never...."
by Newtered States » Mon Sep 17, 2012 1:59 pm
by Delegate Vinage » Mon Sep 17, 2012 2:28 pm
Ubeki beki beki beki stan stan wrote:Delegate Vinage wrote:Vinage gasped, "You want me to do the research for your proposal? Well I never...."
I can find specific instants and give them to you if you'd like. It's just that, within the areas of NationStates where Newtered States did his damage, his crimes are very well known and well attested to.
by Ubeki beki beki beki stan stan » Mon Sep 17, 2012 2:45 pm
Delegate Vinage wrote:Ubeki beki beki beki stan stan wrote:
I can find specific instants and give them to you if you'd like. It's just that, within the areas of NationStates where Newtered States did his damage, his crimes are very well known and well attested to.
Vinage nodded his head, "Preferably in some short dossier. That should suffice for now."
by Newtered States » Mon Sep 17, 2012 3:18 pm
by Skyrim Diplomacy » Mon Sep 17, 2012 4:33 pm
Newtered States wrote:Well, yeah...I did do all of those things. But, they're not as bad as the Herman Cain guy thinks they are. I mean, I did raid Amoncolia, and the United States of Conservadom, caused that one region to cease to exist...and raided Europe, but that's not worthy of a condemnation, right? Why not wait until I raid some more regions?
by Newtered States » Mon Sep 17, 2012 4:34 pm
Skyrim Diplomacy wrote:Newtered States wrote:Well, yeah...I did do all of those things. But, they're not as bad as the Herman Cain guy thinks they are. I mean, I did raid Amoncolia, and the United States of Conservadom, caused that one region to cease to exist...and raided Europe, but that's not worthy of a condemnation, right? Why not wait until I raid some more regions?
Emphasis mine. Case and point right here. Don't feed the troll, OP. Will be voting against.
by The Great Destruction » Mon Sep 17, 2012 6:00 pm
by Skyrim Diplomacy » Mon Sep 17, 2012 6:09 pm
Newtered States wrote:I'm a troll because I'm a raider? That's not the same thing.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement