[PASSED] Banning Extrajudicial Transfer

[Auralia]

HEREBY bans in all member nations the willful, knowledgeable transfer of any individual from a member nation to another jurisdiction by an individual, organization, or member state for the purposes of denying or violating any of the political or civil rights that are guaranteed to that individual in the jurisdiction of the member state by law.

Glen-Rhodes is incredibly dismayed at the over-breadth of the language in this resolution. Extrajudicial transfer is purely an issue of criminal justice and human rights. It is not an issue of "political or civil rights," which goes entirely undefined in this resolution. Taking this into account, Glen-Rhodes will accede to this resolution with one reservation: the ban on extrajudicial transfer only applies to human rights violations and clear violations of the criminal justice statutes within our country.

- Dr. B. Castro

The fact that the terms aren't defined might have been intentional, so you would be able to do just this sort of thing.

[Zyberkalicystan]

HEREBY bans in all member nations the willful, knowledgeable transfer of any individual from a member nation to another jurisdiction by an individual, organization, or member state for the purposes of denying or violating any of the political or civil rights that are guaranteed to that individual in the jurisdiction of the member state by law.

Whos giong to admit to transfering people with the purpose of breaking the law?

[Dagguerro]

HEREBY bans in all member nations the willful, knowledgeable transfer of any individual from a member nation to another jurisdiction by an individual, organization, or member state for the purposes of denying or violating any of the political or civil rights that are guaranteed to that individual in the jurisdiction of the member state by law.

Whos giong to admit to transfering people with the purpose of breaking the law?

Nobody needs to "admit" to anything. Compliance is mandatory and automatic.

[Glen-Rhodes]

Nobody needs to "admit" to anything. Compliance is mandatory and automatic.

Glen-Rhodes promises to transfer an individual to our North Rhodes neighbors, for the purpose of enacting a punishment we wouldn't be able to do in our own territory. There goes your "compliance is mandatory and automatic" argument.

This is a hypothetical scenario.

[Datavia]

HEREBY bans in all member nations the willful, knowledgeable transfer of any individual from a member nation to another jurisdiction by an individual, organization, or member state for the purposes of denying or violating any of the political or civil rights that are guaranteed to that individual in the jurisdiction of the member state by law.

Whos giong to admit to transfering people with the purpose of breaking the law?

The purpose of the proposal is to have an applicable international legislation, in case some member state is discovered perpetrating this obnoxious act, provided that it's a proven fact, even if the member state denies it.

[Robanistania]

I was pleased to vote for this piece of legislation. Thank you for all the hard work that was put into drafting this.

[Quadrimmina]

Thank you to the World Assembly for your overwhelming support in this enterprise. I thank all the respective Ambassadors and delegations who helped shape this resolution into what it is today, and who joined us in the fight to end this jurisdictional loophole once and for all. Together, we were able to affect real change, and I look forward to working with the Assembly to continue to do this, one resolution at a time.

[Quelesh]

Congratulations for passing this excellent resolution!

Alexandria Yadoru
Quelesian WA ambassador