by Quadrimmina » Fri Mar 23, 2012 11:22 am
by Alqania » Fri Mar 23, 2012 11:29 am
Quadrimmina wrote:REVERSES any such transfers that have already occurred.
by Quadrimmina » Fri Mar 23, 2012 11:31 am
Alqania wrote:Quadrimmina wrote:REVERSES any such transfers that have already occurred.
Lord Raekevik raised an eyebrow. "So if Examplalandia has transferred a person to Queer Caribbean Examplalandian Protectorate in a way that this proposal would ban, would the cited clause mean that the person is transferred back to Examplalandia? Is that necessarily a good thing?"
by Paper Flowers » Fri Mar 23, 2012 11:32 am
Quadrimmina wrote:REVERSES any such transfers that have already occurred.
by Quadrimmina » Fri Mar 23, 2012 11:33 am
by Alqania » Fri Mar 23, 2012 11:34 am
Quadrimmina wrote:Alqania wrote:
Lord Raekevik raised an eyebrow. "So if Examplalandia has transferred a person to Queer Caribbean Examplalandian Protectorate in a way that this proposal would ban, would the cited clause mean that the person is transferred back to Examplalandia? Is that necessarily a good thing?"
If the transfer was illegal, then would it not be necessary to correct this?
by Quadrimmina » Fri Mar 23, 2012 11:36 am
by Quelesh » Sat Mar 24, 2012 6:06 pm
Quadrimmina wrote:Paper Flowers wrote:We would question the legality of this clause, if the person has been transferred to a non-WA state then one could not reverse the decision without forcing a non-WA member to follow a WA resolution?
Then how about a clause such as "URGES member nations to take action to, in a way compatible with national security interests and practicality, restore those rights that were not granted due to the transfer."
by Moronist Decisions » Sat Mar 24, 2012 6:22 pm
by Quadrimmina » Sat Mar 24, 2012 7:21 pm
by Quelesh » Sat Mar 24, 2012 7:29 pm
by Quadrimmina » Sat Mar 24, 2012 7:40 pm
Quelesh wrote:With the current wording, it's not entirely clear that the URGES clause is addressing cases in which transfers have already taken place. Perhaps a phrase like "in cases in which such a transfer has taken place prior to the enactment of this resolution" would clear that up.
Edit: also, I think significant may be a more appropriate strength.
Alexandria Yadoru
Quelesian WA ambassador
by Charlotte Ryberg » Sat Mar 24, 2012 10:35 pm
by Quadrimmina » Sun Mar 25, 2012 12:00 am
by Quadrimmina » Sun Apr 22, 2012 11:09 am
by Quelesh » Sun Apr 22, 2012 3:00 pm
by Neo Arcem » Tue May 08, 2012 9:06 am
Hippostania wrote: Just because people vote for something you don't like doesn't mean that their vote shouldn't be ignored.
Winston Churchill wrote:The greatest argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with the average voter.
by Alqania » Tue May 08, 2012 9:11 am
by Cowardly Pacifists » Tue May 08, 2012 9:27 am
by Philimbesi » Tue May 08, 2012 9:45 am
by Athretvari » Tue May 08, 2012 1:10 pm
by Datavia » Tue May 08, 2012 2:05 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement