[PASSED] Commend Unibot II

by **Campinia** » Mon Jan 30, 2012 4:07 pm

Tim-Opolis wrote:The Grand Regiment.... nuff said

AFAIK Unibot was not even online when that happened.

by **Mallorea and Riva** » Mon Jan 30, 2012 4:11 pm

Campinia wrote:
Tim-Opolis wrote:The Grand Regiment.... nuff said
AFAIK Unibot was not even online when that happened.

He holds raiders responsible for the actions taken by other raiding organizations, we can certainly hold him accountable for the actions of his soldiers.

by **Mahaj** » Mon Jan 30, 2012 4:41 pm

Tim-Opolis wrote:The Grand Regiment.... nuff said

Grand Central is collectively voting Against

Thats a really flimsy reason to vote against.

by **Tim-Opolis** » Mon Jan 30, 2012 4:43 pm

Mahaj wrote:
Tim-Opolis wrote:The Grand Regiment.... nuff said

Grand Central is collectively voting Against

Thats a really flimsy reason to vote against.

Plus he's a defender. And I have no respect left for him.

by **Mahaj** » Mon Jan 30, 2012 4:48 pm

Tim-Opolis wrote:
Mahaj wrote:Thats a really flimsy reason to vote against.

Plus he's a defender. And I have no respect left for him.

Eh, thats slightly more valid.

by **Crushing Our Enemies** » Mon Jan 30, 2012 4:52 pm

I will refrain from posting my rational for voting against to avoid breaking the rules. Those who are especially curious may telegram me if they wish.

by **Damanucus** » Mon Jan 30, 2012 5:20 pm

Stephanie receives the previously discussed telegram from an aide. The pair start whispering, although the phrases, "I know, this raises a few questions," and "Not too sure about that," can be overheard. Eventually, Stephanie rises to her podium.

Esteemed ambassadors. Like everyone else, I have received the telegram about which we have discussed. I, along with the aide you previously could've seen, disseminated it and the debates made by the ambassador from Mahaj regarding it at length, and we have come to the conclusion that there is enough question of fact and conduct to warrant us to withdraw our vote from this commendation. While we are sure this commendation will pass nonetheless, we shall be abstaining for the remainder of the vote.

Stephanie Orman
Representative, Nomadic Peoples of Damanucus

by **A mean old man** » Mon Jan 30, 2012 6:59 pm

Tim-Opolis wrote:The Grand Regiment.... nuff said

What I miss?

by **Mallorea and Riva** » Mon Jan 30, 2012 7:04 pm

A mean old man wrote:
Tim-Opolis wrote:The Grand Regiment.... nuff said

What I miss?

Now you've done it. You know not what you have summoned into this thread.

by **Crushing Our Enemies** » Mon Jan 30, 2012 7:17 pm

A mean old man wrote:
Tim-Opolis wrote:The Grand Regiment.... nuff said

What I miss?

Just telegram Rawr for the rant from our side, and telegram Mahaj or Cromarty for the rant from the other side. Or read any gameplay thread any of the above have posted in in the last week.....

by **Mahaj** » Mon Jan 30, 2012 7:21 pm

Crushing Our Enemies wrote:
A mean old man wrote:
What I miss?

Just telegram Rawr for the rant from our side, and telegram Mahaj or Cromarty for the rant from the other side. Or read any gameplay thread any of the above have posted in in the last week.....

The saddest part is that you're actually right. :/

by **Mallorea and Riva** » Mon Jan 30, 2012 7:27 pm

Mahaj wrote:
Crushing Our Enemies wrote:Just telegram Rawr for the rant from our side, and telegram Mahaj or Cromarty for the rant from the other side. Or read any gameplay thread any of the above have posted in in the last week.....

The saddest part is that you're actually right. :/

Can't we all just... get along... sometimes...
This resolution was bound to draw controversy.

by **Connopolis** » Mon Jan 30, 2012 7:30 pm

Mallorea and Riva wrote:
Mahaj wrote:The saddest part is that you're actually right. :/

Can't we all just... get along... sometimes...
This resolution was bound to draw controversy.

You think this is controversy? You ain't seen nothin'.

Yours,

by **Mallorea and Riva** » Mon Jan 30, 2012 7:31 pm

Connopolis wrote:
Mallorea and Riva wrote:Can't we all just... get along... sometimes...
This resolution was bound to draw controversy.

You think this is controversy? You ain't seen nothin'.

Yours,

Ohhh I remember that. Yikes. This has a significantly different result however. It looks like it will pass by a large margin.

by **Connopolis** » Mon Jan 30, 2012 7:35 pm

Mallorea and Riva wrote:
Connopolis wrote:
You think this is controversy? You ain't seen nothin'.

Yours,

Ohhh I remember that. Yikes. This has a significantly different result however. It looks like it will pass by a large margin.

That was a horrible experience - it lost by two votes...

Anyways, wholly for this proposal, and I'm omitting any Defender/Raider rhetoric from influencing my decision. Unibot has contributed tremendously to Nationstates, and would still deserve a commendation, hadn't he been a gameplayer.

Yours,

by **Sanctaria** » Mon Jan 30, 2012 9:05 pm

Voting Against on this.

I realise that Uni has contributed a lot to NationStates, but I can't support something that lauds his leadership of the UDL when, frankly, it leaves a lot to be desired.

by **Foxdale** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 12:59 am

Against.

by **Opaloka** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 6:02 am

Zemnaya Svoboda wrote:
Opaloka wrote:Oh look all the members of the united defenders league have got together for a mutual back patting session.

Unibot2 & the rest of UDL defend fascist regions from legitamate anti fascist action by the 'red fleet' & other antifa comrades including international socialists

So vote 'NO!' & join the fleet.

What fascist region did the League defend from your fleet?

'Pact of Steel' & then claimed they didn't understand the significance of the name. The views of the 'lord high Herald' (please!) Bazlantis as to how fascist Regions are OK & only out & out Nazis are a problem also tells you a lot.

Hi Mahaj! Guess this is another recruitment pitch, ain't life a beach? :-D

by **Opaloka** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 6:10 am

Further update on the policy of 'unibot' & his 'united defenders league' following consultation with Red Fleet commander 'Marxingrad'; 'dictators of the world unite' was another fascist cesspit that the UDL considered worthy of its protection.

Also it IS udl policy that fascist regions are ok & only overt nazi regions are worthy of closedown. Try explaining that policy to victims of the terror regimes of Mussolini & Franco.
Were 'die republikaner' ok because they wore suits?

So you have an 'update engine' well here's an update 'learn some politics before you get in the way of anti-fascist action!'.

Fascist, Nazi, falangist or idiot fellow traveller either way The Red Fleet will bury you!

by **Zemnaya Svoboda** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 8:37 am

Would Anarchy be considered fascist as well?

by **Flemingovia** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 8:55 am

Several claims and counterclaims have been posted. Fair enough, but I have one argument in favour of this commendation that is irrefutable.

Govindia is against this commendation. The correct path is therefore to vote in favour. Q.E.D.

by **Retired WerePenguins** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 4:17 pm

Esteemed members of this august body; who am I kidding, hey you morons out there! The Nifty Fraternity of Retired WerePenguins is proud to support the condemnation of Unibot II … wait did you say that it is a commendation? Oh, in that case, we are against. Nevermind.

by **Lowell Leber** » Thu Feb 02, 2012 11:34 am

Opaloka wrote:Further update on the policy of 'unibot' & his 'united defenders league' following consultation with Red Fleet commander 'Marxingrad'; 'dictators of the world unite' was another fascist cesspit that the UDL considered worthy of its protection.

Also it IS udl policy that fascist regions are ok & only overt nazi regions are worthy of closedown. Try explaining that policy to victims of the terror regimes of Mussolini & Franco.
Were 'die republikaner' ok because they wore suits?

So you have an 'update engine' well here's an update 'learn some politics before you get in the way of anti-fascist action!'.

Fascist, Nazi, falangist or idiot fellow traveller either way The Red Fleet will bury you!

You do realize this is a game? And NS Politics does not equal RL Politics for all of us.

by **The Blaatschapen** » Thu Feb 02, 2012 4:36 pm

APPLAUDING the many scholarly works emnating from Unibot, including an analysis of NationStates generations,

Now I have to vote against. Everything else was just fine. But that piece was like a horoscope. A nation should not be commended for writing elaborate horoscopes.

by **Tim-Opolis** » Thu Feb 02, 2012 4:56 pm

Flemingovia wrote:Govindia is against this commendation. The correct path is therefore to vote in favour. Q.E.D.

That honestly made me reconsider my vote

⚓ The North Pacific ⚓	Zemnaya Svoboda
☯ Taijitu ☯	Eluvatar
❂ Lemuria ❂	El Puppet

[PASSED] Commend Unibot II

Who is online