Advertisement
by The Republic of Lanos » Tue Mar 20, 2012 5:50 pm
by New Unsociety » Tue Mar 20, 2012 6:06 pm
by Philimbesi » Tue Mar 20, 2012 7:18 pm
by Goobergunchia » Tue Mar 20, 2012 9:51 pm
by Unibot II » Wed Mar 21, 2012 1:33 am
Vocenae wrote:Unibot, you have won NS.
General Halcones wrote:Look up to Unibot as an example.
by Drexel Hillsville » Wed Mar 21, 2012 8:55 am
by Philimbesi » Wed Mar 21, 2012 8:57 am
\the Hills will remove themselves from the World Council
by Zarkanians » Wed Mar 21, 2012 9:08 am
Disgusted by Automagfreek’s “Flesh for Fuel” program that used dead enemy soldiers to fuel Automagfreek military vehicles,
by Stalliongrad and Far-Eastern Territories » Wed Mar 21, 2012 11:14 am
Zarkanians wrote:Disgusted by Automagfreek’s “Flesh for Fuel” program that used dead enemy soldiers to fuel Automagfreek military vehicles,
"Zarkanians hosts a similar program, using the corpses of all dead men and women. It does not see why this is considered a problem."
by The Asylum Manager » Wed Mar 21, 2012 3:55 pm
by A mean old man » Wed Mar 21, 2012 4:53 pm
by Damanucus » Wed Mar 21, 2012 8:10 pm
by Allied States of Demokratia » Thu Mar 22, 2012 10:10 am
by Stevid » Thu Mar 22, 2012 11:06 am
by Apathetic Stoics » Thu Mar 22, 2012 11:47 am
Unibot II wrote:*ModSnip*
by Manor » Thu Mar 22, 2012 12:37 pm
by Cinistra » Thu Mar 22, 2012 12:42 pm
Beskie wrote:The International community must step in and stop Automagfreek destruction on Christanity and mankind.
Manor wrote:While Automagfreek's actions may be seen as excessive by some member states, the honorable chairman of Manor feels that the WA has no right to impede on another nation's sovereignty through such an escapade.
Voting, even in an international setting, often gets in the way of rulers rights, and should be avoided when pertaining to the limiting of one nation in particular. Therefore, the honorable chairman of Manor finds that they cannot support this piece of legislation.
by Cromarty » Thu Mar 22, 2012 1:06 pm
Manor wrote:the WA has no right to impede on another nation's sovereignty through such an escapade.
Cerian Quilor wrote:There's a difference between breaking the rules, and being well....Cromarty...
<Koth>all sexual orientations must unite under the relative sexiness of madjack
by Cinistra » Thu Mar 22, 2012 1:15 pm
by Unibot II » Thu Mar 22, 2012 2:05 pm
Cinistra wrote:Cromarty wrote:Actually it can, hence both the General Assembly and the Security Council.
That's why we are against it. We will not pass a resolution which influences another nation. People should show more restraint before the resort to this things, and not try to tell other nations about right or wrong all the time.
Vocenae wrote:Unibot, you have won NS.
General Halcones wrote:Look up to Unibot as an example.
by Manor » Thu Mar 22, 2012 2:25 pm
Unibot II wrote:Cinistra wrote:That's why we are against it. We will not pass a resolution which influences another nation. People should show more restraint before the resort to this things, and not try to tell other nations about right or wrong all the time.
Well, no.. it's an expressed opinion, not an act of influence.
by Frisbeeteria » Thu Mar 22, 2012 2:35 pm
by Cinistra » Thu Mar 22, 2012 3:44 pm
by Cromarty » Thu Mar 22, 2012 3:48 pm
Cinistra wrote:That's the point C&Cs, yes. To express one's opinion. Only redundant paperwork. Futile. Just let it be.
Cerian Quilor wrote:There's a difference between breaking the rules, and being well....Cromarty...
<Koth>all sexual orientations must unite under the relative sexiness of madjack
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement