Advertisement
by Shadowlandistan » Tue Dec 06, 2011 8:39 am
by Knootoss » Tue Dec 06, 2011 8:45 am
Shadowlandistan wrote:Shadownaldistan was very disapointed to see this pass. It's suprising that the vast majority of nations would not want to ensure workers rights/basic decency in the workplace. The Social Assistance Accord would have made healthier work forces and outlaw many backward practices.
by Flibbleites » Tue Dec 06, 2011 9:06 am
Shadowlandistan wrote:Shadownaldistan was very disapointed to see this pass. It's suprising that the vast majority of nations would not want to ensure workers rights/basic decency in the workplace. The Social Assistance Accord would have made healthier work forces and outlaw many backward practices.
by Southern Patriots » Tue Dec 06, 2011 9:11 am
Shadowlandistan wrote:Shadownaldistan was very disapointed to see this pass. It's suprising that the vast majority of nations would not want to ensure workers rights/basic decency in the workplace. The Social Assistance Accord would have made healthier work forces and outlaw many backward practices.
Panzerjaeger wrote:Why would Cleopatra have cornrows? She is from Egypt not the goddamn Bronx.
by The Imperial Republic of New Kyoto » Tue Dec 06, 2011 9:17 am
by Shadowlandistan » Tue Dec 06, 2011 9:54 am
Knootoss wrote:Shadowlandistan wrote:Shadownaldistan was very disapointed to see this pass. It's suprising that the vast majority of nations would not want to ensure workers rights/basic decency in the workplace. The Social Assistance Accord would have made healthier work forces and outlaw many backward practices.
Perhaps "the Social Assistance Accord was a badly written resolution" is a more plausible hypothesis to explain it's passing than your "EVERYONE HATES WORKERS" theory.
by Southern Patriots » Tue Dec 06, 2011 9:56 am
Shadowlandistan wrote:Knootoss wrote:
Perhaps "the Social Assistance Accord was a badly written resolution" is a more plausible hypothesis to explain it's passing than your "EVERYONE HATES WORKERS" theory.
Basic social assistance would have in no way impeded nations economies, and would have guaranteed a basic safety net for those less fortunate than ourselves.
Panzerjaeger wrote:Why would Cleopatra have cornrows? She is from Egypt not the goddamn Bronx.
by The Imperial Republic of New Kyoto » Tue Dec 06, 2011 10:01 am
Shadowlandistan wrote:Knootoss wrote:
Perhaps "the Social Assistance Accord was a badly written resolution" is a more plausible hypothesis to explain it's passing than your "EVERYONE HATES WORKERS" theory.
Basic social assistance would have in no way impeded nations economies, and would have guaranteed a basic safety net for those less fortunate than ourselves.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement