Advertisement
by The Altani Confederacy » Mon Aug 29, 2011 7:15 am
by Wooookiees » Mon Aug 29, 2011 8:53 am
by Palentine WA Office » Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:27 am
by Dizyntk » Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:34 am
Palentine WA Office wrote:Opposed as the arguements for the repeal are spurrious and foolish!
However should the repeal pass, my government is considering parking someU-boats...err...subermersible craft inside the no longer "territorial waters" of the authors' nations and randomly start sinking said nation's fishing vessels and merchant shipping....just for shits and giggles.
Excelsior,
Sen. Horatio Sulla
by Destructor Bunnies » Mon Aug 29, 2011 10:01 am
by Goddess Relief Office » Mon Aug 29, 2011 10:06 am
Palentine WA Office wrote:However should the repeal pass, my government is considering parking someU-boats...err...subermersible craft inside the no longer "territorial waters" of the authors' nations and randomly start sinking said nation's fishing vessels and merchant shipping....just for shits and giggles.
by The Altani Confederacy » Mon Aug 29, 2011 10:06 am
Palentine WA Office wrote:Opposed as the arguements for the repeal are spurrious and foolish!
However should the repeal pass, my government is considering parking someU-boats...err...subermersible craft inside the no longer "territorial waters" of the authors' nations and randomly start sinking said nation's fishing vessels and merchant shipping....just for shits and giggles.
Excelsior,
Sen. Horatio Sulla
by Destructor Bunnies » Mon Aug 29, 2011 10:09 am
Palentine WA Office wrote:Opposed as the arguements for the repeal are spurrious and foolish!
However should the repeal pass, my government is considering parking someU-boats...err...subermersible craft inside the no longer "territorial waters" of the authors' nations and randomly start sinking said nation's fishing vessels and merchant shipping....just for shits and giggles.
Excelsior,
Sen. Horatio Sulla
by South Pacific Belschaft » Mon Aug 29, 2011 12:23 pm
THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF BELSCHAFT
GUARDIAN OF THE SOUTH PACIFIC
by Omigodtheykilledkenny » Mon Aug 29, 2011 12:52 pm
by Southern Patriots » Mon Aug 29, 2011 12:55 pm
Omigodtheykilledkenny wrote:Suddenly the great doors to the General Assembly swing open, and rows of attractive (and rather busty) women in militaristic garb begin marching smartly down the aisles toward the dais. At once some of the diplomats begin pointing and murmuring excitedly, for these women were no strangers to this assembly, nor the world. Though they have nary been seen at the WA since the infamous "Gestapo debacle of 2010" (incidentally, also sponsored by Cobdenia), the "SS Commandos," or as they are more commonly known, Stripper Commandos, are renowned throughout the world as the sexy, slutty defenders of the Kennyite republic. Calmly the ladies take their places in neat rows extending from the podium at the front of the chamber. Some of their audience are gazing expectantly at them, as though anticipating a little dance to lighten the mood, but these are grave times, and the girls have no time for dancing.
Presently their commanding officer, Jenny Chiang, now Captain Chiang, seizes the podium, and begins to address the international community:
Members of the World Assembly, my girls and I have come to this august chamber as a show of support in this tense crisis. The Federal Republic stands with you in this ongoing dispute with the United Nations. Indeed, we have seen what the UN is willing to do when they don't get their way (including but not limited to arson), and we pledge to you tonight: the continued aggression of the UN will not stand! Why, as soon as we heard that the UN had limited WA members' access to their territorial waters, presumably to disable them in the instance of a sea-based attack, our very first thought was that we had to do something to fight it--
An aid appears at her side and whispers urgently into her ear.
What's this? The UN hasn't restricted territorial waters; the WA has, only the resolution accidentally stated "United Nations" instead of "World Assembly"?
The aid whispers in reply.
And now they're trying to repeal the resolution on that basis, even though Resolution #1 clearly states that the UN is now the WA? ... That is beyond retarded!
Chiang turns back to the assembly:
You're on your own, losers!
And with that, the captain and her her able- and tight-bodied underlings march quietly from the chamber, divesting themselves of this ridiculous fiasco and its deceitfully mischievous sponsors.
Panzerjaeger wrote:Why would Cleopatra have cornrows? She is from Egypt not the goddamn Bronx.
by A mean old man » Mon Aug 29, 2011 1:29 pm
Omigodtheykilledkenny wrote:Suddenly the great doors to the General Assembly swing open, and rows of attractive (and rather busty) women in militaristic garb begin marching smartly down the aisles toward the dais. At once some of the diplomats begin pointing and murmuring excitedly, for these women were no strangers to this assembly, nor the world. Though they have nary been seen at the WA since the infamous "Gestapo debacle of 2010" (incidentally, also sponsored by Cobdenia), the "SS Commandos," or as they are more commonly known, Stripper Commandos, are renowned throughout the world as the sexy, slutty defenders of the Kennyite republic. Calmly the ladies take their places in neat rows extending from the podium at the front of the chamber. Some of their audience are gazing expectantly at them, as though anticipating a little dance to lighten the mood, but these are grave times, and the girls have no time for dancing.
Presently their commanding officer, Jenny Chiang, now Captain Chiang, seizes the podium, and begins to address the international community:
Members of the World Assembly, my girls and I have come to this august chamber as a show of support in this tense crisis. The Federal Republic stands with you in this ongoing dispute with the United Nations. Indeed, we have seen what the UN is willing to do when they don't get their way (including but not limited to arson), and we pledge to you tonight: the continued aggression of the UN will not stand! Why, as soon as we heard that the UN had limited WA members' access to their territorial waters, presumably to disable them in the instance of a sea-based attack, our very first thought was that we had to do something to fight it--
An aid appears at her side and whispers urgently into her ear.
What's this? The UN hasn't restricted territorial waters; the WA has, only the resolution accidentally stated "United Nations" instead of "World Assembly"?
The aid whispers in reply.
And now they're trying to repeal the resolution on that basis, even though Resolution #1 clearly states that the UN is now the WA? ... That is beyond retarded!
Chiang turns back to the assembly:
You're on your own, losers!
And with that, the captain and her her able- and tight-bodied underlings march quietly from the chamber, divesting themselves of this ridiculous fiasco and its deceitfully mischievous sponsors.
by Alqania » Mon Aug 29, 2011 1:59 pm
by Lowell Leber » Mon Aug 29, 2011 2:18 pm
by Opaloka » Mon Aug 29, 2011 3:06 pm
by Firestorm0901 » Mon Aug 29, 2011 4:27 pm
by Dizyntk » Mon Aug 29, 2011 4:34 pm
Firestorm0901 wrote:I am appalled that this is even at VOTE! This should have been killed in draft format. You all know that if this act is repealed, this could lead to a Hundreds of armed conflicts before a new resolution of laws can be put into place, versus the small number of any wars that are presently proceeding. If you have a grievance, bring it before the World Assembly Nautical Commission. In addition instead of repealing, Amend it instead with another act. This repeal will cause more problems than fix. I voted for this when it was created and I am firmly opposed to this horrible appeal.
by The Grand Ocean » Mon Aug 29, 2011 4:54 pm
by Apokolyptico United » Mon Aug 29, 2011 5:23 pm
by Askagardlandia » Mon Aug 29, 2011 5:48 pm
by Canadian Davsland » Mon Aug 29, 2011 5:50 pm
by Alqania » Mon Aug 29, 2011 5:55 pm
Askagardlandia wrote:I think the proposal of the law of sea is rather a good idea because it will improve the treatments of safety and order in our world today. And also it can bring to a major international cooperation amongst us. For that reason, I accept this law without any conditions at all.
by Libraria and Ausitoria » Mon Aug 29, 2011 7:31 pm
Firestorm0901 wrote:...You all know that if this act is repealed, this could lead to a Hundreds of armed conflicts before a new resolution of laws can be put into place, versus the small number of any wars that are presently proceeding...
Dizyntk wrote:"This is a good point, Ambassador. However we must point out that this will only work so long as the competeing claims come from WA member nations. As soon as the EEZ of any of our nations infringe onto a non-WA members claims then we see a very good likelihood of conflict. We thus suggest that these international waters serve as an important buffer zone."
○ Commonwealth Capital (Bank) ○ ○ Commonwealth Connect (Bank Treaty) ○ ○ SeaScape (Shipping & Energy) ○(██████████████████████████████║║◙█[Θ]█]◙◙◙◙◙[█]
by Bronshom » Mon Aug 29, 2011 7:46 pm
by Libraria and Ausitoria » Mon Aug 29, 2011 7:54 pm
Bronshom wrote:While the Empire would like to see a draft to replace the resolution in question...
○ Commonwealth Capital (Bank) ○ ○ Commonwealth Connect (Bank Treaty) ○ ○ SeaScape (Shipping & Energy) ○(██████████████████████████████║║◙█[Θ]█]◙◙◙◙◙[█]
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement