[Passed] Repeal "Liberate Wonderful Paradise"

by **Goddess Relief Office** » Mon Aug 22, 2011 10:05 pm

Submitted Version:

Repeal "Liberate Wonderful Paradise"
A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation

Category: Repeal | Resolution: SC#48 | Proposed by: Goddess Relief Office

Description: The Security Council,

RECOGNIZING that Security Council Resolution #48 was intended to prevent Wonderful Paradise from being refounded by invaders from NAZI EUROPE,

NOTING that subsequent events did not turn out as planned, for the appearance of the resolution motivated the invaders to advance their plans to refound the nominee,

DISMAYED that NAZI EUROPE attempted to refound Wonderful Paradise while SC#48 was still being voted upon,

THANKFUL that the worst did not happen, for defenders were able to pre-empt the refounding on March 14, 2011,

NOTING that SC#48 passed on March 17, 2011, three days after the region was already refounded by defenders which returned foundership of Wonderful Paradise to the native community,

RECOGNIZING that while the resolution was noble in intent, the refounding of Wonderful Paradise all but invalidated SC#48,

UNDERSTANDING that natives of Wonderful Paradise, including the founder [nation=short]Capital Knockers[/nation] and the delegate [nation=short]Ovlov United[/nation], wish to repeal SC#48 and free the region from the resolution's limitations. For example, the resolution prevents future delegates from password-protecting the region in order to control invaders, and severely limits the community's ability to refound the region in the unlikely event that the founder ceases to exist,

ENDEAVORING to honor the natives' request and restore full sovereignty rights to Wonderful Paradise,

HEREBY RETIRES SC#48 "Liberate Wonderful Paradise".

_____________________________
Co-sponsored by Delegate of Wonderful Paradise, [nation=short+noflag]Ovlov United[/nation]

References:

by **Ngati Toa** » Mon Aug 22, 2011 10:21 pm

I’m happy with this. It is a superfluous resolution that was intended for good, but considering the region’s current situation, if the liberation resolution is ever employed, it will most likely be for harm.

FOR the repeal.

by **Sichuan Pepper** » Mon Aug 22, 2011 10:28 pm

I support this. Nicely written and is according to native wishes. The region is safely overseen by a founder.

by **Ballotonia** » Mon Aug 22, 2011 10:55 pm

Yep, this one is obvious. In favor.

Ballotonia

by **Warzone Codger** » Mon Aug 22, 2011 10:56 pm

Repealing Liberations are great. For

by **A mean old man** » Mon Aug 22, 2011 11:19 pm

It has my support.

by **Glasgia** » Mon Aug 22, 2011 11:27 pm

I agree

by **YoriZ** » Mon Aug 22, 2011 11:58 pm

agree

by **Sedgistan** » Tue Aug 23, 2011 12:02 am

UNDERSTANDING that natives of Wonderful Paradise, including the founder Capital Knockers and the delegate Ovlov United, wish to repeal SC#48 and free the region from the resolution's limitations. For example, the resolution prevents future delegates from password-protecting the region in order to control invaders or spammers, and severely limits the community's ability to refound the region in the unlikely event that the founder ceases to exist,

Rule 4 violation.

NOTING that SC#48 passed on March 17, 2011, three days after the region was already refounded by defenders who returned foundership of Wonderful Paradise to the native community,

I'd also suggest changing that to "defenders which".

by **Goddess Relief Office** » Tue Aug 23, 2011 12:15 am

Alright, please pull the current resolution from the queue, I will resubmit.

by **Sedgistan** » Tue Aug 23, 2011 12:17 am

You'll need to get a Game Mod to do that, so I'd recommend submitting a Getting Help Request.

by **Goddess Relief Office** » Tue Aug 23, 2011 12:18 am

Okay, I will send a GHR.

by **Xanthal** » Tue Aug 23, 2011 2:15 am

I am approving the proposal, as at first glance it appears to have native support, though as usual I reserve the right to reverse my position if any significant native objections are raised.

Riley Fluffer

by **Unibot II** » Tue Aug 23, 2011 4:42 am

by **Frattastan** » Tue Aug 23, 2011 5:05 am

Indeed.

by **Cinistra** » Tue Aug 23, 2011 6:07 am

Why? They have a founder who can sort things out. Can't see that there is a need for a repeal.

by **Ballotonia** » Tue Aug 23, 2011 6:24 am

Cinistra wrote:Why? They have a founder who can sort things out. Can't see that there is a need for a repeal.

Logic is the other way around: they have no need for a Liberation resolution to remain in force.

Either way, it's up to the natives.

Ballotonia

by **Mahaj** » Tue Aug 23, 2011 6:30 am

FOR.

though i've always wondered, it seems like a great way to get a resolution passed, repeal one of the libs where the region now has a founder.

by **Frattastan** » Tue Aug 23, 2011 6:45 am

Mahaj wrote:FOR.

though i've always wondered, it seems like a great way to get a resolution passed, repeal one of the libs where the region now has a founder.

Yeah, although I'd rather not have the SC queue clogged by this kind of resolutions, in case we need a Liberation.
This one right now is fine, though.

by **Cinistra** » Tue Aug 23, 2011 6:59 am

Mahaj wrote:FOR.

though i've always wondered, it seems like a great way to get a resolution passed, repeal one of the libs where the region now has a founder.

Is there really an urgent need for this repeal, regardless what the "natives" want?

by **Mahaj** » Tue Aug 23, 2011 7:13 am

Cinistra wrote:
Mahaj wrote:FOR.

though i've always wondered, it seems like a great way to get a resolution passed, repeal one of the libs where the region now has a founder.

Is there really an urgent need for this repeal, regardless what the "natives" want?

Frankly if the natives want it, they should have it.

by **Sedgistan** » Tue Aug 23, 2011 8:32 am

Asking as delegate sedge (rather than modly) - can the founder Capital Knockers be relied upon to remain active? Currently it's 19 days since they logged in.

by **Goddess Relief Office** » Tue Aug 23, 2011 8:58 am

That's a yes. As said in the resolution, the founder nation is a "puppet" nation created by defenders which was later given to the natives. I am not at liberty to who controls it, but I can tell you that the native who controls the founder nation is active within 1 day ago.

by **Capital Knockers** » Tue Aug 23, 2011 9:15 am

Sedgistan wrote:Asking as delegate sedge (rather than modly) - can the founder Capital Knockers be relied upon to remain active? Currently it's 19 days since they logged in.

You were saying? I am in support of this resolution, dispite my inactivity.

by **Sedgistan** » Tue Aug 23, 2011 9:22 am

Good to hear - I've approved the proposal.

[Passed] Repeal "Liberate Wonderful Paradise"

[Passed] Repeal "Liberate Wonderful Paradise"

Who is online