[PASSED] Commend Naivetry

by **Unibot II** » Tue Jul 19, 2011 7:58 pm

"Along with Norway, Denmark inherited Iceland, Greenland and the Faroe Islands." (pg. 19-20)

Yes, the phrase 'inherited' has been used to describe the development of empires. Spain actually inherited the Netherlands (more specifically, their king did) too.

by **Daynor** » Tue Jul 19, 2011 8:20 pm

I suppose we can try and see if it flys with the mods. Did you bring the eight-ball Uni?

by **Unibot II** » Tue Jul 19, 2011 8:45 pm

*brings the lucky eight-ball*

I always keep it by my side!

by **Eternal Yerushalayim** » Wed Jul 20, 2011 5:44 am

Token support from my secret WA mission...

by **Daynor** » Wed Jul 20, 2011 7:00 am

Eternal Yerushalayim wrote:Token support from my secret WA mission...

Where'd that background check detective go?

by **Zhelezo** » Wed Jul 20, 2011 7:08 am

I'll support it.

by **Daynor** » Wed Jul 20, 2011 7:00 pm

Unibot II wrote:"Along with Norway, Denmark inherited Iceland, Greenland and the Faroe Islands." (pg. 19-20)

Yes, the phrase 'inherited' has been used to describe the development of empires. Spain actually inherited the Netherlands (more specifically, their king did) too.

Daynor wrote:I suppose we can try and see if it flys with the mods.

Can I ask for a ruling when you can get around to it?

by **Oliver the Mediocre** » Fri Jul 22, 2011 1:33 pm

Acknowledging Naivetry's continual campaigning after the invasion of Belgium in 2009 lead...

"Lead" is the present tense, "Led" is the past tense. Please use the correct tense.

by **Daynor** » Fri Jul 22, 2011 8:32 pm

I did that somewhere else the other day... I've forgotten where. Thanks! I appear to have problems with that word.

by **Sir Lans** » Sat Jul 23, 2011 8:54 pm

Observing Naivetry was co-founder and an important leader of Equilism and member of the region's military, the E-Army,

Um, since when is Nai co-founder of Equilism? I certainly respect Nai, but that region was around long before she was...

by **Daynor** » Sat Jul 23, 2011 8:59 pm

Sir Lans wrote:

Um, since when is Nai co-founder of Equilism? I certainly respect Nai, but that region was around long before she was...

Screen shot from Equilism's forums:

That would be where I heard Nai was co-founder, I have no idea obviously, I joined the last days of 08.

by **Unibot II** » Sat Jul 23, 2011 11:27 pm

Could be wrong, but didn't Nai resurrect Equilism as co-resurrector basically?

by **Crazy girl** » Sun Jul 24, 2011 6:43 am

On the co-foundership: I believe they indicate with that that Nai has (shared) control over the founder nation of Equilism. This nation originally belonged to the player behind Equility (who was a fellow Dutchie

) and nowadays Nai and Westie control the nation.

On the "inherit" bit, I don't see any (legal) problem with that.

by **Sir Lans** » Sun Jul 24, 2011 9:48 am

Crazy girl wrote:On the co-foundership: I believe they indicate with that that Nai has (shared) control over the founder nation of Equilism. This nation originally belonged to the player behind Equility (who was a fellow Dutchie ) and nowadays Nai and Westie control the nation.

On the "inherit" bit, I don't see any (legal) problem with that.

Exactly. This point should be clarified though because it reads to me as if she co-founded the region...

by **Crazy girl** » Sun Jul 24, 2011 10:29 am

Ah yes, a good point. It does read that way right now.

by **Daynor** » Sun Jul 24, 2011 10:31 am

Only because I thought she did the whole time.

by **Crazy girl** » Sun Jul 24, 2011 10:32 am

Afraid not :lol:

Perhaps simply removing the "co-founder title" or maybe rewording it, though that could be tricky while dodging Rule 4...

by **Daynor** » Sun Jul 24, 2011 10:36 am

Already did...? :lol:

by **Marjorie Baldwin** » Sun Jul 24, 2011 4:16 pm

I will support this resolution.

by **Left wing Marxism** » Sun Jul 24, 2011 7:31 pm

This Resolution is Fully Supported by the Proletarian Council of The Republic of Left Wing Marxism.

by **Ageleia** » Tue Jul 26, 2011 10:37 am

Oooh Latin.
Sounds decent...Support (:

by **Daynor** » Sat Jul 30, 2011 11:32 pm

Uhhh.. Has anyone more suggestions as to what should go in this that isn't already in it?

OR

Has anyone that was around longer than me have any knowledge to share that will help me out? :lol:

by **Ballotonia** » Sat Jul 30, 2011 11:56 pm

Let me start off saying that I support the concept of this resolution: commending Naivetry for a variety of contributions to this game.

However, I do feel we should get it right.

Daynor wrote:Believing Naivetry led the region effectively into a period of higher activity than The Rejected Realms had ever experienced ...

How is this measured? Cause I honestly doubt it is true, if I compare my recollection of what TRR was in 2003-2004.

Back then the regional population of TRR was double of what it is now. See: viewtopic.php?f=12&t=72928
More importantly, the invasion/defense game was alive and kicking with TRR playing an important part. Kandarin was actively maintaining relations with many key players throughout the game, and the RRA was fully participating in daily defenses. With invaders (and on occasion defenders too) kicked to TRR it was a continuous center of activity, not just as a region in and of itself, but also of lots of interregional activity.

Ballotonia

by **Daynor** » Sun Jul 31, 2011 12:05 am

"than TRR had experienced in years"?

You're probably spot on actually, I forget I missed the golden age.

by **Ballotonia** » Sun Jul 31, 2011 12:06 am

Daynor wrote:"than TRR had experienced in years"?

You're probably spot on actually, I forget I missed the golden age.

Yep, that's a good modification.

Ballotonia

[PASSED] Commend Naivetry

Who is online