NATION

PASSWORD

PASSED: Condemn Sedgistan

A carefully preserved record of the most notable World Assembly debates.

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Corporate Councils
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1205
Founded: Mar 11, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Corporate Councils » Sun Apr 10, 2011 2:35 am

I would like to emphasize that the overview for Sedgistan clearly states that said country is too cool to condemn, therefore the Confederacy of Corporate Councils will vote against this resolution, lest we appear to be 'uncool'.

User avatar
Jasarite
Envoy
 
Posts: 239
Founded: Jul 15, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Jasarite » Sun Apr 10, 2011 6:43 am

I, also, don't want to appear to be uncool. Therefore, I vote against.
We must not look at goblin men,
We must not buy their fruits:
Who knows upon what soil they fed
Their hungry thirsty roots?- Goblin Market-Christina Rosetti

User avatar
Crazy girl
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 6276
Founded: Antiquity
Mother Knows Best State

Postby Crazy girl » Sun Apr 10, 2011 6:45 am

Sedge voted FOR too. Are you calling him uncool? :P

User avatar
Andorianus
Diplomat
 
Posts: 598
Founded: Mar 23, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Andorianus » Sun Apr 10, 2011 6:48 am

Just a month ago, people wanted to commend Sedge. Now everyone wants to condemn him?
From the people, the government, and the community of Andorianus.
Economic Left/Right: -1.88 Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.64
GENERATION 31: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.

"In American football, you make a touchdown. In Soviet football, touch makes down YOU!!!"
(PS: Ever played Soviet football? It sucks.)
"In Soviet C&C Firestorm, system is slave to YOU!"
"In America, you rob a private-owned bank. In Soviet Russia, state-owned bank robs YOU!!!"
Risottia wrote:If you think that avoid killing civilians is a failure, I don't like your idea of success.

User avatar
Southern River
Civilian
 
Posts: 1
Founded: Apr 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Southern River » Sun Apr 10, 2011 11:31 am

humpf, pink. Pink is a big shame. >:(

The Republic of Southern River will support this proposal. :clap:

User avatar
Daftatt
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 57
Founded: Aug 02, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Daftatt » Sun Apr 10, 2011 2:56 pm

This has to be the dumbest vote ever to come to NS, sedgistan has

A. already been commended for it's contributions to the game, so condemning it would only serve to show the disfunctional nature of the security council, or WA in general. A huge majority of nations just vote YES on EVERYTHING and don't bother to read the proposal.

B. whoever posted this obviously has a pretty harsh relationship towards sedgistan, and is EXAGGERATING the offenses of sedgistan, so what if a nation wants to become more powerful! you shouldn't be punished for being better than other people ;)

C. WHY THE CRAP IS THE WORD "CONDEMN" BEING USED SO LIGHTLY! condemning isn't for overly active nations, it's for nations that DO EVIL! Not the Japans, but the North Koreas.

D. BOOHOO! Get over the color pink. pink is pink is pink is PINK! If you care so much, learn HTML, open up the page source, and change it yourself. or start a new forum, don't come whining to the SC.
The Zogist Ascendancy of Daftatt
“Eins Zwei Polizei”

Puppets:
Dreadnought Omega
Spanish Meatloaf

User avatar
Crazy girl
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 6276
Founded: Antiquity
Mother Knows Best State

Postby Crazy girl » Sun Apr 10, 2011 3:04 pm

Yeah, I hate Sedge. That's why I made him an admin on my forum, that's why I made him co-founder of two of my IRC chans and that's why I work together with him in the Rejected Realms. :meh:

In other words, read the thread first. :p

Oh, and he voted FOR on this himself.

User avatar
Namanda (Ancient)
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 5
Founded: Apr 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Namanda (Ancient) » Sun Apr 10, 2011 4:29 pm

Daftatt wrote:This has to be the dumbest vote ever to come to NS, sedgistan has

A. already been commended for it's contributions to the game, so condemning it would only serve to show the disfunctional nature of the security council, or WA in general. A huge majority of nations just vote YES on EVERYTHING and don't bother to read the proposal.

B. whoever posted this obviously has a pretty harsh relationship towards sedgistan, and is EXAGGERATING the offenses of sedgistan, so what if a nation wants to become more powerful! you shouldn't be punished for being better than other people ;)

C. WHY THE CRAP IS THE WORD "CONDEMN" BEING USED SO LIGHTLY! condemning isn't for overly active nations, it's for nations that DO EVIL! Not the Japans, but the North Koreas.

D. BOOHOO! Get over the color pink. pink is pink is pink is PINK! If you care so much, learn HTML, open up the page source, and change it yourself. or start a new forum, don't come whining to the SC.


So Sedge wants a Condem badge, that would explain his vote FOR this! What i cannot get it is how changing a forum pink would be a Security Council matter...

Today I used one yellow T-shirt and I gave food to a cat, so can someone Commend me? OF COURSE NOT, then stop playing with WA and SC objectives....

User avatar
Crazy girl
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 6276
Founded: Antiquity
Mother Knows Best State

Postby Crazy girl » Sun Apr 10, 2011 4:33 pm

You didn't see the other clauses, obviously...and yellow is an even worse color than pink.

User avatar
Unibot II
Senator
 
Posts: 3852
Founded: Jan 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Unibot II » Sun Apr 10, 2011 5:10 pm

Daftatt wrote:Not the Japans, but the North Koreas.


Japanese and North Koreans -- and if you think the people of North Korea are generally evil, take it to NSG (and god help them).
Vocenae wrote:Unibot, you have won NS.
General Halcones wrote:Look up to Unibot as an example.
Member of Gholgoth | The Capitalis de Societate of The United Defenders League (UDL) | Org. Join Date: 25/05/2008
Unibotian Factbook // An Analysis of NationStates Generations // The Gameplay Alignment Test // NS Weather // How do I join the UDL?
World Assembly Card Gallery // The Unibotian Life Expectancy Index // Proudly Authored 9 GA Res., 14 SC Res. // Commended by SC#78;
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
Duty is Eternal, Justice is Imminent: UDL

User avatar
Namanda (Ancient)
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 5
Founded: Apr 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Namanda (Ancient) » Sun Apr 10, 2011 6:01 pm

And then you would love one mentally ill person that loves yellow color to condem you for your precious badge, so you could compete with your friend Sedgistan... Please, you are just throwing some personal grudge YOU have against one player to a SC! Could not one admin/moderator just review this? It's a issue that doesn't bother NS at all... if that person f***ed your beloved board, to the point where the ADMINS or even creator of that board have power to undo the mess, then:
1. Create another board
2. Choose wisely to who you pass admin control of changing colors! OMG, He just changed the colors cause he had ADMIN POWERS someone gave him! In the end it's your problems (and probably your fault too)

Please people, OOC for a instant, but this doesn't concern SC...

Crazy girl wrote:You didn't see the other clauses, obviously...and yellow is an even worse color than pink.

User avatar
Nassuria
Civilian
 
Posts: 1
Founded: Jan 21, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Nassuria » Sun Apr 10, 2011 7:35 pm

It seems to me that the reasons for condemning Sedgistan are private, selfish, arrogant and none of the wider world's business. I am appalled that the the majority so far has voted in favour of the notion. I like to think that leader's took the time to READ and DELIBERATE on proposals rather than systematically clicking 'vote for', seems I was wrong.

User avatar
Agersia
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 14
Founded: Feb 28, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Agersia » Sun Apr 10, 2011 9:35 pm

I am not a puppet of Sedgistan.

This is not a matter for the SC. We have no jurisdiction over things that happen off-site. If you really think that what he has done is a punishable act, then you should take it to the TRR government, and not waste the time of the SC. I mean I enjoy jokes and everything, but I feel that the Security Council of the World Assembly is not the place for it.
Proud Citizen of New Sorvun
WA Representative of New Sorvun

User avatar
Todd McCloud
Senator
 
Posts: 4088
Founded: Oct 11, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Todd McCloud » Sun Apr 10, 2011 9:37 pm

Is this a joke C&C or...?

I couldn't really read it without being just a tiny bit suspect ;)
"Your uniform doesn't seem to fit. You're much too alive in it."

"You must be the change you want to see in the world" - Gandhi
"The worst prison would be a closed heart." - Pope John Paul II

User avatar
Namanda (Ancient)
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 5
Founded: Apr 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Namanda (Ancient) » Mon Apr 11, 2011 4:27 am

Nassuria wrote:It seems to me that the reasons for condemning Sedgistan are private, selfish, arrogant and none of the wider world's business. I am appalled that the the majority so far has voted in favour of the notion. I like to think that leader's took the time to READ and DELIBERATE on proposals rather than systematically clicking 'vote for', seems I was wrong.


The worst part is that they actualy READ IT! This is in fact a joke both sedge and crazygirl are playing, while several delegates just voted for because got contacted to do it... It's sad as some people support this kind of joke while still pretend to play seriously at WA! And by the way, from what we can read at the GUIDES on NS, this IS an illegal proposal, since it doesn't concern SC, the facts aren't of world concern, and crazy girl not only proposed, but she used herself as example! So if i want to conmend myself, I just say i'm a really nice person because Namanda recognizes this?!

User avatar
St Flamel
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 7
Founded: Mar 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby St Flamel » Mon Apr 11, 2011 4:32 am

So if you don't like 'em, you condem 'em? I've gotta say that pink is a pretty good colour, so I'm going to have to vote against.

User avatar
Sedgistan
Site Director
 
Posts: 35471
Founded: Oct 20, 2006
Anarchy

Postby Sedgistan » Mon Apr 11, 2011 5:34 am

Namanda wrote:And by the way, from what we can read at the GUIDES on NS, this IS an illegal proposal, since it doesn't concern SC, the facts aren't of world concern,

Right, putting my mod hat on here, and being serious - point me to the section of the SC rules that you think makes this proposal illegal.

and crazy girl not only proposed, but she used herself as example! So if i want to conmend myself, I just say i'm a really nice person because Namanda recognizes this?!

Well no, because calling yourself a 'nice person' would violate Rule 4 by referring to a nation as a person.

User avatar
Ethel mermania
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 129547
Founded: Aug 20, 2010
Father Knows Best State

Postby Ethel mermania » Mon Apr 11, 2011 5:42 am

Greetings from ethel mermania a small country with a love of broadway musicals.


we do not believe a nation should be condemned on the basis, of its love of lurid pinkness. We should accept a nation’s love of non primary colors and accept them as they are into the community of nations.

we vote against,


* and we are kind of fond of lurid pink ourselves, but that is not why we voted that way honest
https://www.hvst.com/posts/the-clash-of ... s-wl2TQBpY

The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion … but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.
--S. Huntington

The most fundamental problem of politics is not the control of wickedness but the limitation of righteousness. 

--H. Kissenger

User avatar
Namanda (Ancient)
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 5
Founded: Apr 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Namanda (Ancient) » Mon Apr 11, 2011 6:02 am

Sedgistan wrote:
Namanda wrote:And by the way, from what we can read at the GUIDES on NS, this IS an illegal proposal, since it doesn't concern SC, the facts aren't of world concern,

Right, putting my mod hat on here, and being serious - point me to the section of the SC rules that you think makes this proposal illegal.

and crazy girl not only proposed, but she used herself as example! So if i want to conmend myself, I just say i'm a really nice person because Namanda recognizes this?!

Well no, because calling yourself a 'nice person' would violate Rule 4 by referring to a nation as a person.



"Bloody Stupid

Every now and then a Proposal crops up that, for lack of a more tactful description, is stupid. This is clearly a judgment call, but if you're going to mandate that all cars be pink, you're gonna have a dead proposal on your hands. This includes things that are unworthy of WA consideration (such as mandating allowances for children who eat their vegetables)."

This was taken from viewtopic.php?f=9&t=18

So yeah, i really suck at quoting or other html code stuff, but this pretty much says everything! Even the pink color is used as example! I know it's funny, but everyone knows it's a "bloody stupid" condem proposal!
And change nice person to a nice nation and you can conmend me ;) (or condem me if i say your mod hat is weird shapped?!)

Anyway, i will stop talking... I desagree, I know everyone who read this knows what i'm saying, and even if this proposal can be considered legal, it still doesn't make sense to be here... Anyway, be happy with your condem and conmend badges at your nation page...

User avatar
Sedgistan
Site Director
 
Posts: 35471
Founded: Oct 20, 2006
Anarchy

Postby Sedgistan » Mon Apr 11, 2011 6:35 am

You're quoting the General Assembly rules there - the Security Council ones (pinned, in this forum) are the ones that apply to Security Council proposals.

If you check the Compendium, you'll see this bit on Joke proposals. Yes, joke proposals are illegal in the Security Council. However, that does not mean that humour is banned. Examples of humorous/satirical proposals that were legal and made it to vote are Condemn Gatesville, Commend Anti World Assembly, Condemn Omigodtheykilledkenny and Commend The Skeleton Army.

User avatar
Bears Armed
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21478
Founded: Jun 01, 2006
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Bears Armed » Mon Apr 11, 2011 6:41 am

Ethel mermania wrote:Greetings from ethel mermania a small country with a love of broadway musicals.


we do not believe a nation should be condemned on the basis, of its love of lurid pinkness. We should accept a nation’s love of non primary colors and accept them as they are into the community of nations.


"So for you 'lurid pink' -- or pink, anyhows -- is actually not a 'primary' colour? Hr'rmm, I hadn't known that about humans before now...
"Or are your nation's people actually
different from mainstream humans in this respect?"


Artorrios o SouthWoods,
ChairBear, Bears Armed Mission at the World Assembly


^_^
Last edited by Bears Armed on Mon Apr 11, 2011 1:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The Confrederated Clans (and other Confrederated Bodys) of the Free Bears of Bears Armed
(includes The Ursine NorthLands) Demonym = Bear[s]; adjective = ‘Urrsish’.
Population = just under 20 million. Economy = only Thriving. Average Life expectancy = c.60 years. If the nation is classified as 'Anarchy' there still is a [strictly limited] national government... and those aren't "biker gangs", they're traditional cross-Clan 'Warrior Societies', generally respected rather than feared.
Author of some GA Resolutions, via Bears Armed Mission; subject of an SC resolution.
Factbook. We have more than 70 MAPS. Visitors' Guide.
The IDU's WA Drafting Room is open to help you.
Author of issues #429, 712, 729, 934, 1120, 1152, 1474, 1521.

User avatar
Ethel mermania
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 129547
Founded: Aug 20, 2010
Father Knows Best State

Postby Ethel mermania » Mon Apr 11, 2011 7:37 am

Bears Armed wrote:
Ethel mermania wrote:Greetings from ethel mermania a small country with a love of broadway musicals.


we do not believe a nation should be condemned on the basis, of its love of lurid pinkness. We should accept a nation’s love of non primary colors and accept them as they are into the community of nations.


"So for you 'lurid pink' -- or pink, anyhows -- is actually a primary colour? Hr'rmm, I hadn't known that about humans before now...
"Or are your nation's people actually
different from mainstream humans in this respect?"


Artorrios o SouthWoods,
ChairBear, Bears Armed Mission at the World Assembly


^_^


“Ah, our esteemed ambassador from bear’s armed”,

The nameless drone says taking a step back and making sure there is a table and a few chairs between him and the approximate distance between his nose and the reach of the mighty’s bear’s foreclaws.

“… We said “. . . non primary colors . . . “ My good ambassador, please check the text of our speech, we are aware that most of the multiverse views pink as a non primary color. Discrimination if you ask me, (the other drones nod their heads in agreement) but sadly we are use to it. We also notice that .” .

The drone pauses and takes a further step back before continuing.

“ your spelling is punctuated with an unfortunate extra letter "u" in the word color. We have noticed that this fondness for the letter “U” is found in other of your speeches, we wonder if this symptom of dyslexia is what inhibited your understanding of what we were trying to state? We have many excellent reading specialists in ethel mermania, and we would love to be able to help you with your problem.” :D
https://www.hvst.com/posts/the-clash-of ... s-wl2TQBpY

The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion … but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.
--S. Huntington

The most fundamental problem of politics is not the control of wickedness but the limitation of righteousness. 

--H. Kissenger

User avatar
Namanda (Ancient)
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 5
Founded: Apr 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Namanda (Ancient) » Mon Apr 11, 2011 9:25 am

Sedgistan wrote:You're quoting the General Assembly rules there - the Security Council ones (pinned, in this forum) are the ones that apply to Security Council proposals.

If you check the Compendium, you'll see this bit on Joke proposals. Yes, joke proposals are illegal in the Security Council. However, that does not mean that humour is banned. Examples of humorous/satirical proposals that were legal and made it to vote are Condemn Gatesville, Commend Anti World Assembly, Condemn Omigodtheykilledkenny and Commend The Skeleton Army.


To me this is still a joke proposal...
Anyway, is there a way one "nation" click on the color option of a board? To me there is no way! So, I think a PERSON did this, making him target of Cragirl country laws, and violating the Rule 4 (a) plus (e) because hating pink color is her own taste (ideology, in this case, since it's a "country" who hates)...

Anyway, most of those jokes you posted I would be against too... (maybe with except the skeletal army, since she developed a way of doing a "evil" act without acusing any harm, proving you can roleplay evil and not taking away the fun, since when she leaved the region would be back to it's original state)

User avatar
Sedgistan
Site Director
 
Posts: 35471
Founded: Oct 20, 2006
Anarchy

Postby Sedgistan » Mon Apr 11, 2011 9:30 am

Namanda wrote:To me this is still a joke proposal...
Anyway, is there a way one "nation" click on the color option of a board? To me there is no way! So, I think a PERSON did this, making him target of Cragirl country laws, and violating the Rule 4 (a) plus (e) because hating pink color is her own taste (ideology, in this case, since it's a "country" who hates)...

The clause in question says:
Horrified by how Sedgistan has changed the interior of the Rejected Realms forum to the color pink, despite knowing how this would affect the other participants, and completely disregarding their opinions,

Nowhere does it mention that Crazy Girl dislikes this colour. 'Forums' has already been ruled as acceptable, so long as it can be read as "the forums of power" - ie a parliament type building. Conceivably, a country could order the colour of a forum to be changed, and this may upset the people who use it ('participants').

Anyway, most of those jokes you posted I would be against too... (maybe with except the skeletal army, since she developed a way of doing a "evil" act without acusing any harm, proving you can roleplay evil and not taking away the fun, since when she leaved the region would be back to it's original state)

You mean 'against' or 'view them as illegal'? Because those proposals were all legal.

User avatar
DAVEYPROD
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 184
Founded: Dec 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby DAVEYPROD » Mon Apr 11, 2011 12:03 pm

Sedgistan wrote:
Namanda wrote:To me this is still a joke proposal...
Anyway, is there a way one "nation" click on the color option of a board? To me there is no way! So, I think a PERSON did this, making him target of Cragirl country laws, and violating the Rule 4 (a) plus (e) because hating pink color is her own taste (ideology, in this case, since it's a "country" who hates)...

The clause in question says:
Horrified by how Sedgistan has changed the interior of the Rejected Realms forum to the color pink, despite knowing how this would affect the other participants, and completely disregarding their opinions,

Nowhere does it mention that Crazy Girl dislikes this colour. 'Forums' has already been ruled as acceptable, so long as it can be read as "the forums of power" - ie a parliament type building. Conceivably, a country could order the colour of a forum to be changed, and this may upset the people who use it ('participants').

Anyway, most of those jokes you posted I would be against too... (maybe with except the skeletal army, since she developed a way of doing a "evil" act without acusing any harm, proving you can roleplay evil and not taking away the fun, since when she leaved the region would be back to it's original state)

You mean 'against' or 'view them as illegal'? Because those proposals were all legal.

Huhhh. its HIM *Points to Sedgistan, hekkles* Booooooo Booooooo

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to WA Archives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads