Advertisement
by Corporate Councils » Sun Apr 10, 2011 2:35 am
by Jasarite » Sun Apr 10, 2011 6:43 am
by Andorianus » Sun Apr 10, 2011 6:48 am
Risottia wrote:If you think that avoid killing civilians is a failure, I don't like your idea of success.
by Southern River » Sun Apr 10, 2011 11:31 am
by Daftatt » Sun Apr 10, 2011 2:56 pm
by Crazy girl » Sun Apr 10, 2011 3:04 pm
by Namanda (Ancient) » Sun Apr 10, 2011 4:29 pm
Daftatt wrote:This has to be the dumbest vote ever to come to NS, sedgistan has
A. already been commended for it's contributions to the game, so condemning it would only serve to show the disfunctional nature of the security council, or WA in general. A huge majority of nations just vote YES on EVERYTHING and don't bother to read the proposal.
B. whoever posted this obviously has a pretty harsh relationship towards sedgistan, and is EXAGGERATING the offenses of sedgistan, so what if a nation wants to become more powerful! you shouldn't be punished for being better than other people
C. WHY THE CRAP IS THE WORD "CONDEMN" BEING USED SO LIGHTLY! condemning isn't for overly active nations, it's for nations that DO EVIL! Not the Japans, but the North Koreas.
D. BOOHOO! Get over the color pink. pink is pink is pink is PINK! If you care so much, learn HTML, open up the page source, and change it yourself. or start a new forum, don't come whining to the SC.
by Crazy girl » Sun Apr 10, 2011 4:33 pm
by Unibot II » Sun Apr 10, 2011 5:10 pm
Daftatt wrote:Not the Japans, but the North Koreas.
Vocenae wrote:Unibot, you have won NS.
General Halcones wrote:Look up to Unibot as an example.
by Namanda (Ancient) » Sun Apr 10, 2011 6:01 pm
Crazy girl wrote:You didn't see the other clauses, obviously...and yellow is an even worse color than pink.
by Nassuria » Sun Apr 10, 2011 7:35 pm
by Agersia » Sun Apr 10, 2011 9:35 pm
by Todd McCloud » Sun Apr 10, 2011 9:37 pm
by Namanda (Ancient) » Mon Apr 11, 2011 4:27 am
Nassuria wrote:It seems to me that the reasons for condemning Sedgistan are private, selfish, arrogant and none of the wider world's business. I am appalled that the the majority so far has voted in favour of the notion. I like to think that leader's took the time to READ and DELIBERATE on proposals rather than systematically clicking 'vote for', seems I was wrong.
by Sedgistan » Mon Apr 11, 2011 5:34 am
Namanda wrote:And by the way, from what we can read at the GUIDES on NS, this IS an illegal proposal, since it doesn't concern SC, the facts aren't of world concern,
and crazy girl not only proposed, but she used herself as example! So if i want to conmend myself, I just say i'm a really nice person because Namanda recognizes this?!
by Ethel mermania » Mon Apr 11, 2011 5:42 am
by Namanda (Ancient) » Mon Apr 11, 2011 6:02 am
Sedgistan wrote:Namanda wrote:And by the way, from what we can read at the GUIDES on NS, this IS an illegal proposal, since it doesn't concern SC, the facts aren't of world concern,
Right, putting my mod hat on here, and being serious - point me to the section of the SC rules that you think makes this proposal illegal.and crazy girl not only proposed, but she used herself as example! So if i want to conmend myself, I just say i'm a really nice person because Namanda recognizes this?!
Well no, because calling yourself a 'nice person' would violate Rule 4 by referring to a nation as a person.
by Sedgistan » Mon Apr 11, 2011 6:35 am
by Bears Armed » Mon Apr 11, 2011 6:41 am
Ethel mermania wrote:Greetings from ethel mermania a small country with a love of broadway musicals.
we do not believe a nation should be condemned on the basis, of its love of lurid pinkness. We should accept a nation’s love of non primary colors and accept them as they are into the community of nations.
by Ethel mermania » Mon Apr 11, 2011 7:37 am
Bears Armed wrote:Ethel mermania wrote:Greetings from ethel mermania a small country with a love of broadway musicals.
we do not believe a nation should be condemned on the basis, of its love of lurid pinkness. We should accept a nation’s love of non primary colors and accept them as they are into the community of nations.
"So for you 'lurid pink' -- or pink, anyhows -- is actually a primary colour? Hr'rmm, I hadn't known that about humans before now...
"Or are your nation's people actually different from mainstream humans in this respect?"
Artorrios o SouthWoods,
ChairBear, Bears Armed Mission at the World Assembly
^_^
by Namanda (Ancient) » Mon Apr 11, 2011 9:25 am
Sedgistan wrote:You're quoting the General Assembly rules there - the Security Council ones (pinned, in this forum) are the ones that apply to Security Council proposals.
If you check the Compendium, you'll see this bit on Joke proposals. Yes, joke proposals are illegal in the Security Council. However, that does not mean that humour is banned. Examples of humorous/satirical proposals that were legal and made it to vote are Condemn Gatesville, Commend Anti World Assembly, Condemn Omigodtheykilledkenny and Commend The Skeleton Army.
by Sedgistan » Mon Apr 11, 2011 9:30 am
Namanda wrote:To me this is still a joke proposal...
Anyway, is there a way one "nation" click on the color option of a board? To me there is no way! So, I think a PERSON did this, making him target of Cragirl country laws, and violating the Rule 4 (a) plus (e) because hating pink color is her own taste (ideology, in this case, since it's a "country" who hates)...
Horrified by how Sedgistan has changed the interior of the Rejected Realms forum to the color pink, despite knowing how this would affect the other participants, and completely disregarding their opinions,
Anyway, most of those jokes you posted I would be against too... (maybe with except the skeletal army, since she developed a way of doing a "evil" act without acusing any harm, proving you can roleplay evil and not taking away the fun, since when she leaved the region would be back to it's original state)
by DAVEYPROD » Mon Apr 11, 2011 12:03 pm
Sedgistan wrote:Namanda wrote:To me this is still a joke proposal...
Anyway, is there a way one "nation" click on the color option of a board? To me there is no way! So, I think a PERSON did this, making him target of Cragirl country laws, and violating the Rule 4 (a) plus (e) because hating pink color is her own taste (ideology, in this case, since it's a "country" who hates)...
The clause in question says:Horrified by how Sedgistan has changed the interior of the Rejected Realms forum to the color pink, despite knowing how this would affect the other participants, and completely disregarding their opinions,
Nowhere does it mention that Crazy Girl dislikes this colour. 'Forums' has already been ruled as acceptable, so long as it can be read as "the forums of power" - ie a parliament type building. Conceivably, a country could order the colour of a forum to be changed, and this may upset the people who use it ('participants').Anyway, most of those jokes you posted I would be against too... (maybe with except the skeletal army, since she developed a way of doing a "evil" act without acusing any harm, proving you can roleplay evil and not taking away the fun, since when she leaved the region would be back to it's original state)
You mean 'against' or 'view them as illegal'? Because those proposals were all legal.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement