Laka Strolistandiler wrote:Figu wrote:
"It is the intent of the Republic to put forth a resolution to return the WA to being about mutual cooperation rather than ideological imperialism. Should that fail, we will have no choice but to withdraw. Know that we will not accept the result if the very likely outcome of it passing becomes reality. If you should attempt to force our nation to submit to this, we will fight back with all due force. If it is economic sanctions, we will trade with non-WA nations. If it is military force, we will retaliate with our nuclear weapons. We do not wish to start a war, but we will fight one to the end."
- Chief Delegate Rodgers
Obraztsova: Ambassador, I don’t want to sound too pessimistic, but I believe that your proposal will be either in violation of far too many resolutions or will not be able to acquire enough support even before the voting. The WA is extremely self-assured, holding little to no regard for the individual status and/or cultural traditions of member states, essentially being a unitari-ish state, the only thing that keeps it from being a truly dictatorial state being the fact that it’s free to leave. That’s one of the main reasons why in a mere two days my delegation will leave this body for good, a decision that in my opinion should’ve been done the moment “Repeal: On Abortion” had passed.
"I am firmly aware of this fact, but we must try. It is our duty to make one last stand here, to make our case known, and ensure that the World Assembly knows that there are nations willing to stand against tyranny. It is unfortunate, but we would be remiss to give up without a fight."
- Chief Delegate Rodgers